Logo

Diversity Macht Frei

"There was times when people would burn books because they didn't like what people were doing." - Michael Berryman

Share This Resource
News Feeds
Rss
Profile Links
Gab
Home

Please Help to Expand AgendaOfEvil.com

These links and any other content or links on this website are provided for information only. No warranty is provided regarding their accuracy, and no liability is accepted for reliance on them. AgendaOfEvil.com is not responsible for the content of external sites. AgendaOfEvil.com does not necessarily endorse any or all of the views expressed on these external sites.
Generic placeholder image
Accumulative and convincing research has demonstrated that Judaic materials extensively fill the narrative and legal contents of Islam. Since the seminal work of Geiger and the comments of Hurgronje, through the writings of among other scholars Goldziher, Torrey, and Lazarus-Yafeh, no less the trenchant interpretations of Crone and Cook, both the Qur'an and hadith literature have been examined with an eye to their substantive and central biblical and rabbinic elements. Such comparative religious investigation requires knowledge of both Judaic and Islamic works and traditions in order to offer a credible presentation of the similarity of the materials within each religious context. Illustrative of this point is the textual example of the Qur'anic injunction prohibiting eating swine and carrion (Qur. 5:3) which bears an exact analogy to the Biblical prohibition (Lev. 11:7 and 39-40). Many Qur'anic dicta likewise parallel basic rabbinic legislation of Talmudic authority. For example, Jewish law forbids a divorced woman to remarry before an interval of three months, in order to determine who fathered her next child (Tal. Yevamot 41a), as does the Qur'an (Sura 2:228). Likewise, a man may take up to four women in marriage according to the Qur'an (Siura 4:3), this limitation already appearing earlier in the Talmud (Yevamot 44a). The notion of a mother suckling her baby for twenty-four months is rabbinically discussed (Tal. Ketubot 60a) while Qur'anically sanctioned thereafter (Sura 2:233). Another example of an exact Islamic replication of Judaism concerns a person preparing for prayer who must first wash his hands, but if water is unavailable, then to rub his hands with some earth (Tal. Berakhot 15a and Siura 4:43 and 5:6). It is interesting that Islamic sources in their own narrative, known as isr'ilyyat, do not necessarily conceal the explicit Jewish source of normative Muslim behavior, as in the initial adoption by Muhammad of the ashura tenth-day fast in mimicry of the Jewish tenth-day fast of atonement in the Hebrew month of Tishrei. Another telling example and one of no little significance was Judaism's ostensible direct influence on Islam concerning the direction of prayer (qibla) toward Jerusalem. This is a Talmudic notion and a principle of the halakha (Berakhot 30a) well before Muhammad, when promoting the new Islamic faith in Medina, had authorized the practice of facing toward sacred Jerusalem in prayer. After eighteen months, however, the qibla was changed to the Ka'ba in Mecca. This is not the only case where a Jewish feature was initially adopted, though later to be abandoned, by Islam. But there are other cases where a difference, sometimes slight and often stark, distinguishes Islam from Judaism. The Talmud states that a person knows that the time for the morning Shm'a prayer has arrived, when enough light enables him to differentiate between 'a blue and white thread' on the tzitzit fringes of his talit prayer shawl (Bera/diot 9b). The Qur'an uses the same image, but with a change of color, in pointing out that a person knows the day has dawned when he is able to differentiate 'a white thread from a black one' (Siura 2:187).The famous story of Mohammed's magic night flight also appears to have a rabbinic origin.Certainly one of the most enigmatic yet famous Qur'anic verses relates to Muhammad's 'night journey' (isra') from the holy mosque, presumably the masod al-haram in Mecca, to 'the furthest mosque' called the masgid al-aksa. This obscure notion of Muhammad's miraculous night flight from Mecca to Jerusalem, no less his ascension from the Holy Mount to heaven to converse with Moses in particular, evoked a variety of traditional Muslim responses that included, no less, dis- belief and astonishment....A possible Jewish source for this unusual 'night journey' to Jerusalem appears in the Rabbinic translation exegesis in Aramaic of the Bible attributed, though this is questioned, to R. Yonatan Ben Uziel from the Tannaitic period. It is considered that this translation/commentary from the post-Temple period diverges with a powerful midrashic-homilectical inclination from the Hebrew Biblical text.' This characteristic is evident in the case before us. The relevant narrative in question from the Book of Exodus (Ch. 19:4) recalls what God 'did to Egypt' in the course of the Jewish flight to freedom, and how He raised the Children of Israel 'on wings of eagles' (al kanfei nesharim) in bringing them close to Him. The Aramaic translation describes how God placed the Israelites on clouds, as if on the wings of birds, and carried them from Pilusin, to be identified with Ramses in Egypt, and brought them to the site of the Beit Mukdasha (Temple) situated in Jerusalem. Thus, as the Yonatan Ben Uziel exegesis continues to explain, the Israelites were brought to the Temple in order to slaughter the Passover sacrifice animal there, that same night returning to Pilusin in Egypt. So the Israelites who were in the desert were brought to Mount Moriah, where the Temple would later stand, and there offered the sacrificial Passover lamb on the altar; thence, they quickly returned that same night to Egypt.Source: Note on a Possible Jewish Source for Muhammad's 'Night Journey' by (((Mordechai Nisan))), Arabica, T. 47, Fasc. 2 (2000), pp. 274-277

Generic placeholder image
He made two unexceptional remarks: 1) The born-African "took away a job from an Italian doctor". 2) "Africans are Africans and belong to an ethnic group very different from ours" For this, he has to pay the negress €50,000! Italy's first black minister has said she feels "vindicated" after winning a four-year court battle against a far-right MEP who made repeated racist slurs against her. Mario Borghezio has been order to pay Cécile Kyenge 50,000 euros ($55,690; £42,895) by a court in Milan. Among other comments, Borghezio said she "took away a job from an Italian doctor" in a 2013 radio interview. The Northern League MEP must also pay Ms Kyenge's legal fees. Borghezio - who was briefly suspended by his party in 2011 for saying he agreed with parts of Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik's manifesto - reportedly said he would lose his house following the ruling. However, Ms Kyenge, who was born in the Democratic Republic of Congo, told the BBC's Newsday radio programme: "At the end of the day this is a strong message against impunity. those who believe there is no justice should think twice. "Through this verdict the younger generations have also learned that a civilised society is based on mutual respect, and zero tolerance for discrimination." Ms Kyenge, pictured, decided to pursue him through the courts - and won Ms Kyenge, who trained as an ophthalmologist in Italy, found herself subject to abuse after she was named as integration minister in 2013 - including having bananas thrown at her during a political rally and being compared to an orang-utan. She was provided with police protection, but decided to pursue Borghezio through the courts after the 2013 interview, in which he also said "Africans are Africans and belong to an ethnic group very different from ours".Source The European Parliament voted to lift Borghezio's immunity from prosecution to make this possible.

Generic placeholder image
Manchester Muslim community leaders "concerned" about some Islamophobic hate crimes in wake of terror attack https://t.co/yNRbU7O8xj pic.twitter.com/pIKTSc1Fmj— BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) 24 May 2017 Uh-huh.There has been a sickening parade of Islamophile, pro-diversity propaganda on the British news channels today. This is yet further proof that jihad works. It gets results. It yields a pay-off for your cause. I'm not sure which part of the jihad experience is worst. Phase 1 in which Muslims come to kill you with their bombs. Or Phase 2 in which politicians and celebs arrive to flay your soul with platitudes and sentimentality.But it does raise an interesting question: if the most hardcore members of the "Alt Right" started carrying out terrorist attacks, would non-violent anti-immigrationists then be given free airtime on the BBC and Sky to make their case?Somehow I think, in those circumstances, the same rules wouldn't apply.

Generic placeholder image
Not a single person in public life, not one journalist and not one politician in the "far lite" parties like UKIP, Front National, AfD, etc. dares to call for a ban on Muslim immigration. Instead they propose petty gestures like banning burkas or sharia courts. So intimidated by political correctness are they that not even the EDL or Tommy Robinson call for a ban on Muslim immigration despite polls showing that 47% of the British people would support one. But here we have a brownskin, Tanweer Ahmed, saying what no white man dares to. He is a Muslim and works for Rebel Media, run by Ezra Levant, so he is part of the Counterjewhad scene. A short term response of restricting Islamic immigration is reasonable and one supported by majority opinion throughout Europe according to a February Chatham House poll. The surge in ridiculously titled Far Right parties throughout Europe is further testament to such support. How can groups that are democratic, nonviolent and attract the support of over one third of the population be called Far Right? We know from local Essential polling that virtually half of Australians support the same policy locally.SourceThis is what it has come to. We are dependent on brown people taking pity on us for essential truths to be uttered. Of course, a brownskin almost certainly won't be prosecuted for hate speech for saying this; while someone of European ethnicity would be. So the roots of this fear lie in a justice system built on racial tyranny that systematically discriminates against the majority population.

Generic placeholder image
Negro Hugh Muir has been calling for her to be prosecuted.

Generic placeholder image
The BBC still haven't told us the identity of the Muslim perpetrator. CBS news has identified him as 23-year-old Salmad Abedi. But one the BBC's reporters has been keen to point out on Twitter that they understand the attacker was "British or from UK". This, of course, is to stop the attack being cited as an argument against immigration, a favourite ploy of the British ruling class. No one dares to point out to them that these perps are almost exclusively of recent immigrant origin, even if not first generation.

Generic placeholder image
The history of human evolution has been rewritten after scientists discovered that Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa. Currently, most experts believe that our human lineage split from apes around seven million years ago in central Africa, where hominids remained for the next five million years before venturing further afield. But two fossils of an ape-like creature which had human-like teeth have been found in Bulgaria and Greece, dating to 7.2 million years ago. The discovery of the creature, named Graecopithecus freybergi, and nicknameded ‘El Graeco' by scientists, proves our ancestors were already starting to evolve in Europe 200,000 years before the earliest African hominid. An international team of researchers say the findings entirely change the beginning of human history and place the last common ancestor of both chimpanzees and humans - the so-called Missing Link - in the Mediterranean region. At that time climate change had turned Eastern Europe into an open savannah which forced apes to find new food sources, sparking a shift towards bipedalism, the researchers believe. “This study changes the ideas related to the knowledge about the time and the place of the first steps of the humankind,” said Professor Nikolai Spassov from the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. “Graecopithecus is not an ape. He is a member of the tribe of hominins and the direct ancestor of homo."..."We were surprised by our results, as pre-humans were previously known only from sub-Saharan Africa," said doctoral student Jochen Fuss, a Tübingen PhD student who conducted this part of the study. Professor David Begun, a University of Toronto paleoanthropologist and co-author of this study, added: "This dating allows us to move the human-chimpanzee split into the Mediterranean area." During the period the Mediterranean Sea went through frequent periods of drying up completely, forming a land bridge between Europe and Africa and allowing apes and early hominids to pass between the continents. The team believe that evolution of hominids may have been driven by dramatic environmental changes which sparked the formation of the North African Sahara more than seven million years ago and pushed species further North. They found large amounts of Saharan sand in layers dating from the period, suggesting that it lay much further North than today. Professor Böhme added: "Our findings may eventually change our ideas about the origin of humanity. I personally don't think that the descendants of Graecopithecus die out, they may have spread to Africa later. The split of chimps and humans was a single event. Our data support the view that this split was happening in the eastern Mediterranean - not in Africa. "If accepted, this theory will indeed alter the very beginning of human history."SourceHopefully this will put an end to the "We're all from Africa" line.

Generic placeholder image
Jewish Defence League member, Gregory Chelli, terrorised "anti-semites" and their families, critics of Israel and even journalists who wrote unflattering things about him. One of his specialties was contacting the elderly parents of his targets and telling them their children were dead. Another was making fake confessions of crimes that would bring legions of police descending on his target's home. One victim of his harassment died. Israel refuses to extradite him to France. Jew have made a celebratory documentary about him.He was born and raised in a comfortable middle-class Parisian suburb. His mother worked in retail and his father was in advertising. Both now live in Israel, not far from him. He says his family never identified much with religion and that none of them, including him, ever felt any special Zionist inclinations. He also says that he never suffered any anti-Semitic harassment, though his younger brother did. Nonetheless, sometime in his early twenties, about a decade ago, Chelli became active in the Jewish Defense League. At the time, the views of people like Alain Soral (a journalist and writer who became a far-right ideologue spouting anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist comments), Kémi Séba (founder of the French movement dedicated to defending the black race and known for virulently anti-Semitic rhetoric) and Thomas Werlet (a neo-Nazi-aligned politician), among others, were gaining an increasingly warm welcome in France. Above all, there was the surging popularity of French comedian Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, inventor of the quenelle – the inverted Nazi salute. “It used to be, years ago, that anti-Semitism was confined to the old-style extreme-rightists whom no one thought of as a sane group. But for some years now, anti-Semitism has become fashionable, with different, newer explanations given for it,” Chelli explains. “In 2008, I saw Dieudonne and the change in him. He was very sophisticated. Everyone whose ideology included a Jew-hating side identified with Dieudonne and expressed support, even if they came from opposite sides of the barricade. He brought together leftist Kémi Séba and neo-Nazis Alain Soral and Thomas Werlet. During that period a coalition of shady characters began to gather around Dieudonne, who were linked only by Jew hatred.” Chelli’s interest in computers and programming began when he was 7 years old, and by the time he was an adolescent, he was trying to learn how to hack into websites. At the same time he began to draw up a list of anti-Semitic activists and became a registered member of the Jewish Defense League, but it took him a few more years to put the first at the service of the second. Meanwhile, he says, he committed more traditional criminal offenses. He received an 18-month suspended sentence, for example, after setting Werlet’s motorcycle on fire, and he serenely describes acts of vandalism against the pro-Palestinian Jewish organization Europalestine. (“They’re crazy. They call IDF soldiers SS.”) “Jews who pressure a supermarket chain to remove Israeli merchandise from the shelves, that’s crazy. I felt that I had to do something, and I did a lot together with the Jewish Defense League. Werlet is a terrible person with horrible opinions, a neo-Nazi whose statements filtered down and caused other people to identify. That’s dangerous. Dieudonne and Alain, on their own, brought about a change in public opinion in France, they separated ‘Zionist’ from ‘Jewish.’ They claim that they have no problem with Jews, but that Zionism is a disease. Slowly but surely the boundaries between this distinction began to erode.” One morning, seething with fury, he entered Dieudonne’s official website and, in a “very simple” operation, revealed the names of the anti-Semitic comedian’s supporters. All those who made donations to him, those who were photographed performing the quenelle – amounting to some 10,000 names, which he then sent to France’s principal media outlets, which published his list. “It was more elegant and more effective, and I realized that it was a far better method of operation and that I should concentrate my efforts in that direction,” he says. And the film, at least at the beginning, entertains viewers with the hacker’s sweet revenge. For example, he calls the police and confesses to terrible crimes supposedly committed by the same anti-Semite, while summoning large numbers of policemen to his home, over and over. He brings down websites, exposes criminal or unacceptable behavior (he caught Soral sending nude pictures of himself to a “17-year-old fan”) and posts them publicly. Even those photographed performing the quenelle are not exempt. Their relatives receive phone calls, ostensibly from the police or the emergency services, who inform them of the death of their loved ones from consumption of rotten pineapple. That last stunt marks the the point where Jewish pride encounters a sense of unease for the first time. It turns into real disgust when Chelli’s practical jokes turn into abuse. How is an anti-Semite’s elderly, blind mother-in-law to blame for her son-in-law’s behavior, for example? And why does Chelli laugh with such sadistic pleasure? He threatens the leader of a BDS-supporting Jewish leftist movement, and at the height of the film he also threatens journalist Benoit Le Corre, who had published an unflattering article about him. After contacting Le Corre’s parents and informing them that their son had died in an accident, he summons the police to their home in the Paris suburbs in the middle of the night. Five days later, Le Corre’s father suffers a heart attack. He dies a short time later. Thierry Le Corre's death in 2014 led to a sharp change in the attitude of the authorities toward Chelli’s activities. After years of turning a blind eye, they began to investigate him. He was accused of deliberate violence that caused death, and an international warrant was issued for his arrest.SourceThe Jew's rule in the State now appears secured to such an extent that he may not only again call himself Jew, but ruthlessly admits his final thoughts as regards nationality and politics. A part of his race even admits quite openly that it is a foreign people, however, not without again lying in this respect. For while Zionism tries to make the other part of the world believe that the national self- consciousness of the Jew finds satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian State, the Jews again most slyly dupe the stupid goyim. They have no thought of building up a Jewish State in Palestine, so that they might perhaps inhabit it, but they only want a central organization of their international world cheating, endowed with prerogatives, withdrawn from the seizure of others: a refuge for convicted rascals and a high school for future rogues. But it is the sign, not only of their rising confidence, but also their feeling of safety, that now, at a time when one part of them still mendaciously plays the German, the Frenchman, or the Englishman, the other part impudently and openly documents itself as the Jewish race.Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Generic placeholder image
Women from this district in the east of Paris complain about no longer being able to move without enduring remarks and insults from men. They are several hundred square metres of abandoned asphalt abandoned solely to men, and where women no longer have the right to be. Cafes, bars and restaurants are prohibited to them. Also the pavements, the metro stations and the squares. Since more than a year, the Chapelle-Pajol district (Xe- XVIIIe), has completely changed its appearance: groups of dozens of men on their own, unauthorised pedlars, dealers, migrants and traffickers, occupy the streets, harassing women. In revulsion, the inhabitants of the district have decided to launch a petition to denounce the situation. And a daily life that is ever more oppressive. Such as that of the young women who can no longer go out alone, wear a skirt or trousers that are too tight-fitting without being bombarded with insults: one of them recalls how a cigarette was thrown in her hair. "We all get unbearable treatment," emphasises Nathalie, 50, who says she has lived for thirty years in the district and that there is a "new" climate in recent months: "There are insults, constant remarks. The atmosphere makes you anxious, to the point where we have to change our routes, our clothing. Some have even stopped leaving their homes." Such as the old woman of eighty years, sexually assaulted when she was returning to her building, and is now entrenched in her apartment. Aurélie, a young woman of 38, admits she no longer recognises the district where she has lived for 15 years, rue Perdonnet (Xe) : "Just walking around has become problematic. The cafe beneath my house, which used to be a nice bistro, has become a place exclusively for men and constantly crowded: I get my share of remarks when I pass by, especially as they drink a lot: on some days, just going to my window has unleashed a flood of insults, and I have had to shut myself in my apartment." ...The Chapelle metro, Laure carefully avoids it. Like the square of the same name: "In recent weeks, I found myself in the middle of a fight between illegal pedlars. In a panic, I started to shout, and two of them took out knives to threaten me. I thought I was about to die. And for months my 12-year-old daughter hasn't gone to school alone, or anywhere else in the district."SourceOf course there is no real discussion of who these "men" are. Political correctness prevents any mention of the fact that all of these men are brown-skinned aliens who belong in Africa or the Middle East.

Generic placeholder image
The Second Vatican Council was the take-down of the Catholic Church by the Jews. More than a millennium worth of teaching, and knowledge distilled from hard experience, was jettisoned without justification. Jews were declared innocent of the crime of killing Christ, thus repudiating the Gospel of Matthew ("His blood be upon us and our children!"). Antisemitism was decried. Active efforts to convert Jews were abandoned. And the doors were thrown open to the dilute, interfaith utopianism we see prevailing to this day ("Religions are all the same! They just call God by different names!").As I discussed in Part 1 of this series (link), this victory was achieved partly through infiltration of the Catholic Church by Jews "converting" to Catholicism (not a few of whom "converted" back to Judaism afterwards) then working to undermine it from within, and partly through successfully applied sophistry, a Jewish specialty.But while the Council was in session, an extraordinary last-minute effort was made to avert this final capitulation of the Catholic Church before Jewry.Even while the Council was sitting there appeared a book of more than 600 pages, not obtainable through normal channels but distributed among the council fathers, with the title Complotto contro la Chiesa (Rome 1962), written by a certain 'Maurice Pinay' In an extreme and the book reflects what at the time of the Council was printed in some Italian newspapers; that the Council was a clever manoeuvre to push through the reluctant apertura a sinistra (the Italian idea of a break through). One passage is enough to illustrate this: . . . a veritable fifth column of agents controlled by Freemasons, communism and the secret powers that command them; some of these agents were even to be found among those cardinals, archbishops and bishops who form a kind of progressive wing within the Council and who are trying to get the various reforms adopted . . . and all this ostensibly in order to modernise the Church and to align her with the times, but with the hidden intention of opening doors to communism, to hasten the collapse of the free world and to prepare for the imminent destruction of Christendom'.Vatican II: Impressions of a Struggle of Minds E. SCHILLEBEECKX Life of the Spirit (1946-1964) Vol. 17, No. 202 (JUNE 1963), pp. 499-505The "Plot against the church" is one of the most fascinating works of antisemitism ever. As well as covering contemporary topics such as Communism, it goes into the deep history of the conflict between Christendom and Jewry, elaborated over the centuries as a struggle between the Christian church and vicious Jewish adversaries who foment heresies in order to weaken and confound it.It was reported that "America First" nationalist Gerald L. K. Smith was involved in trying to gain an audience for the book. ...Msgr. George Higgins, a columnist for the National Catholic Welfare Conference's press service reported angrily (St. Louis Review, July 30) that Gerald L. K. Smith had written to all American bishops offering to supply them, free of charge, with a copy of an English translation of a "sickening diatribe against the Jews." This long "pathologically antisemitic book/' by a pseudonymous Maurice Pinay, entitled II Complotto contra la la Chiesa ("The Plot Against the Church"), had been distributed to all of the bishops during the second session of the Council (AJYB, 1965 [Vol. 66], p. 112). Smith's four-page letter, Msgr. Higgins reported, suggested that the American bishops had been taken in by "a fraternity of deceivers too close to the centers of authority in the affairs of the church."Source: THE CHURCH AND THE JEWS: THE STRUGGLE AT VATICAN COUNCIL IIby Judith Hershcopf, The American Jewish Year Book, Vol. 67 (1966), pp. 45-77Published by: American Jewish CommitteeBut who was the author? Maurice Pinay had never been heard from before and was never heard from again. How was he able to produce a work that was clearly the product of profound study, translate it into multiple languages, print thousands of copies of it (all the bishops attending the council got one) and somehow distribute it inside the Vatican during a secret conclave? The book was distributed in Italian but there are reports and indications that it was originally written in Spanish. Various sources claim it was written by a group rather than an individual. Some reports in Italian mention Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga as one of the authors.Joaquín Sáenz y ArriagaOne traditional Catholic French website mentions "a Jesuit priest who was the amanuensis and spokesman of Cardinal Ottaviani (1890-1979) and a group of cardinals". Ottaviani was the head of the Holy Office, successor to the inquisition. News reports at the time of the council (almost invariably hostile) depict him as a hard reactionary holding out against the tide of liberal change.The New York Times said this:If anyone was defeated at Vatican Council II, it was Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani. head of the Holy Office, official guardian of Roman Catholic orthodoxy, president of the all-important Theological Commission, fiery spokesman for the council's intrepid conservatives and, in his own words, the Roman Catholic Church's "old policeman". He was outspokenly opposed to almost every change brought about by the council and fought the losing battle against most of them with all the considerable resources at his disposal.Source: New York Times, "Vatican's Policeman", March 3, 1966Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga was indeed a Jesuit and a profound and learned man. In 1971, he wrote a book called "La nueva iglesia montiniana (The new Montinian Church) (1971). Montini was the real name of Pope Paul VI, the Pope who had presided over the council. The book earned Sáenz y Arriaga almost instant excommunication. Here is an extract:Montini aka Anti-Pope Paul VILet us examine pictures which have appeared in communications media of Paul VI with the Pectoral of Judaism and the Ephod of the great Levite priest of Judaism ... therein, may be a decisive key. Notice the unorthodox ritual sign above the chest of the Pope and keep in mind the current subversion of the Church, the confessed infiltration of the Jews, Masons, and Communists into the clergy. Though we do not know the total extent of Pope Montini's secret and public relations with the worst enemies of the Church, we can study the steps he has taken to reform the Church, destroy its structure and, little by little, eliminate the Marks of Catholicism, blending the Church into other religions. I exhort you to remember Montini's visits and discussions at the United Nations and the Geneva World Council of Churches; his ecumenical surrender, his humanistic dialog lacking spiritual quality. I believe we have the right ... even the obligation ... to ask this question: Is John B. Montini a true Catholic ... or, is he an infiltrator, a Jewish director for the Mafia? I have been suspicious for some time. Now, I have near-certain evidence that Paul VI is not a legitimate Pope, but an anti-Pope ... a trained Jew, employed by the Mafia to use diabolical but undiscerned methods, employing time, money and the unquestionable ability of those who have always dreamed of dominating the World. Source: The New Montini ChurchSáenz y Arriaga actually mentions "Maurice Pinay" in this book in a section called The Plot Against the Church.According to the pontifical teaching of such eminent prelates as Msgr. Delassus and Msgr. Jouin as well as the brave writers Leo Poincins, Peter Virion and Maurice Pinay, a dreadful truth was foretold of A SATANICAL PLOT FOR WORLD DOMINATION by the Counter-church; a plan wherein the agents of Satan already considering themselves victorious - do not hesitate to publish these declarations. Not only do we recall Stanistas Guaita, the economist Roca of St. Yves d'Alveydre, etc. and Sinarquia, but this plot is amply confirmed by the "Judicial Records of Learned Scholars from Sion," discovered at the end of the last century, due to an error (the OCCULT POWER would never have permitted these documents to be published voluntarily, since their very nature was one of ultra-secrecy). It is a shame that these warnings, condemnations and revealing records were not heeded by our ecclesiastics or faithful Catholics.Msgr. Jouin, Pierre Virion and Léon de Poncins were all French Catholics who worked on a publication called Revue internationale des sociétés secrètes, which trafficked in conspiracy theories about Freemasons, Communists and Jews. These generally have the same tenour as the Maurice Pinay book. It's far from implausible that they were involved in writing it. Set against that is the fact that it was originally written in Spanish and that Léon de Poncins is known to have written (in French) another book/pamphlet while the council was in session and had it distributed to those attending. This was "Le Problème Juif Face au Concile " [The Jewish Problem before the Council - English translation], which documented the infiltration and lobbying of Jews, particularly Jules Isaac, aimed at undermining traditional Christian teaching.If Sáenz y Arriaga was Maurice Pinay, why would he not have revealed himself in this section? Why persist in pretending it was a third party? Recall that, at this time, Sáenz y Arriaga was still a member of the Catholic church. It was only the publication of this very book that earned him excommunication.In 1973 (after being excommunicated), Sáenz y Arriaga expanded on these thoughts in another book called Sede Vacante: Paulo VI no es legítimo Papa (Vacant Seat: Paul VI is not a legitimate Pope) , which argued that the reforms of Vatican II meant that the Catholic Church had effectively ceased to be the Catholic Church; Paul VI was an invalid Pope and his successors would also be invalid. This helped start an entire movement, known as sedevacantism, a kind of Alt Catholic Church, which continues to this day, of diehard Catholics waiting for the Vatican to unJew itself and return to its true nature. Post-Vatican II Establishment Catholicism, Sáenz y Arriaga branded "The Montinian Heresy".Anyone who has read the Plot Against the Church and The New Montinian Church cannot help but be struck by their similarity in style. To me, these appear very much like works of the same author.Supporting the idea of Mexican authorship of the text, this blog (in Spanish) argues that the "Plot Against the Church" or "Complot contra la iglesia" was written by the "Mexican far-right", although it does not mention Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga specifically. The only proof it cites of this claim is the following text which appeared on a 1968 Spanish edition of the work."México, D. F. el primero de septiembre del año del Señor de 1968. -LA COMISION DE SACERDOTES CATÓLICOS QUE ORDENÓ ESTA EDICIÓN"Mexico, Federal District the first of September of the Year of Our Lord 1968 - The Commission of Catholic Priests which ordered this edition.This hardly seems definitive proof of authorship. The blog goes on to claim that the authors were the "neo-nazi secret society 'Tecos' which controls everything that happens at the Autonomous University of Guadalajara" and the Organización Nacional del Yunque, also known as just El Yunque.The Autonomous University of Guadalajara was a private university founded in protest against the efforts of the Mexican government to control education and supposedly infuse it with Marxist indoctrination. El Yunque is alleged to be a secret far-right paramilitary organisation in Mexico, which is said to have carried out political assassinations operating through various front groups. It has also been active in Spain. Its mission, it is claimed, is to "bring order to the state to establish the City of God in conformity with the Gospel".The book "Feathers of the Condor: Transnational state terrorism, exiles and civilian anticommunism in Latin America" also claims, without any substantiation, that the Maurice Pinay book was written and published by the "Tecos", a group that emerged in the 1930s from another right-wing counterevolutionary formation called Los Cristeros whose purpose was to defend the Catholic church against anti-clerical, Marxist-inspired legislation.Carlos Cuesta Gallardo was one of the most influential Teco members. He spent some time in Berlin studying the Nazi regime and developed close ties with important members of Hitler's entourage in Germany and Europe, including Nazi collaborators such as the Ustashi and Iron Cross. Upon his return to Mexico, Gallardo introduced the Nazi ideal to other Teco members and made "Jews, Jesuits and Communists" their sworn enemies. Until the 1950s, Los Tecos were very close to the Catholic Church. ...As the Cold War progressed, tensions began to emerge between the most radical elements in the group and the Catholic Church. This situation reached one of its highest points during establishment of the Vatican II Council in 1962. The Tecos rejected this Council and argued that the Catholic Church had been infiltrated by communists and, particularly, the Jews. That year, in order to undermine the Council's attempt to include pressing social issues as part of its religious doctrine, the Tecos published a highly controversial book [The Plot Against the Church] heavily loaded with anti-Semitic material. In it, the organisation blamed Jews and communists for almost everything in history. ...The publishing of this book represented a major shift from the organisation's origins, and led to a number of internal power struggles among its members. Subsequently, the Tecos became more violent. ...Anderson and Anderson maintain that thanks to Gallardo and Julio Meinveille, a Jesuit priest who lived in Buenos Aires and was a fervent admirer of Adolf Hitler, the Tecos "became the spiritual mentors for many of the continent's neo-Nazi movements and, eventually, the coordinators of right-wing death squads throughout Central America" in the 1980s. Source: "Feathers of the Condor: Transnational state terrorism, exiles and civilian anticommunism in Latin America" by Fernando López (link)The book "Homage to Chiapa: The New Indigenous Struggles in Mexico" by Bill Weinberg also claims that the Tecos were responsible for the Maurice Pinay book.After the war, Los Tecos established the Mexican Anti-Communist League (FEMACO), the Mexican chapter of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL), and became a clearinghouse for ant-Semitic literature, such as their Conspiracy Against the Church. They also established control over the Automonous University of Guadalajara, loaning their name to the school fútbol team.This website, which says it is a Wiki on the topic of the Yunque, claims that Carlos Cuesta Gallardo not only founded Los Tecos but wrote the "Plot Against the Church" under the pseudonym Maurice Pinay as well as another book called "La Gran Conspiración Judía" [The Great Jewish Conspiracy - I don't think an English translation of it has been done] under the pseudonym Traian Romanescu. The latter focuses mainly on analysing the connections between Jews and Communism. It does strongly resemble the Plot Against the Church in parts, without demonstrating quite the same depth of historical or theological understanding. However, both books could certainly be by the same author.Carlos Cuesta Gallardo aka Traian Romanescu (aka Maurice Pinay?)But if Los Tecos wrote and published the Plot Against the Church, how did they get the kind of clout to have it distributed inside the Vatican during the Second Council?Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga said his first Mass in Guadalajara but I haven't been able to find any information about whether he had enduring ties to it or to the university. Guadalajara did indeed become the one of the principal powerbases for sedevacantism so this is not implausible. The city is also said to be a bastion of Mexican conservatism, including the "far-right". I have to admit, I hadn't previously realised there was a Mexican "far-right". But you live and learn. Since the "Plot Against the Church" clearly bears the imprint of profound study, including study of theology, it's difficult for me to believe that it could simply be put together by a bunch of right-wing, counter-revolutionary gunmen. That said, Los Tecos were obviously not your average pistoleros. They were clearly highly intellectual and impregnated with a sense of spirituality. The López book claims that the group even split up in 1965 over disagreement the reforms of the Second Vatican Council. A new group, called Yunque, which accepted the reforms, emerged; while diehard Tecos denounced Pope Paul VI as a Communist and Jew and became more intensively violent.I still incline towards the conclusion that the principal author of "The Plot to Destroy the Church" was Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga but several published sources say it came from Los Tecos and Carlos Cuesta Gallardo. This raises an intriguing question. Will American "White nationalists" find it emotionally challenging to acknowledge that one of the greatest works of antisemitism was written by a Mexican?Joaquín Sáenz y ArriagaI will update this article if I acquire more information about the author or authors of "The Plot Against the Church"UPDATE: Aha! I found a new published source that confirms my suspicion of a connection between Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga, Carlos Cuesta Gallardo and Los Tecos. I'll just cite a long extract from it here.BEGIN CITATIONCarlos Cuesta Gallardo, the creator of the modem-day Tecos, spent World War II in Berlin. His exact role or function there is unknown. Some say he was a secretary to Hitler; others say he was a confidant of Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi ideologue who formulated the German anti-Jewish policy and who was executed at Nuremberg. Whatever his role, Cuesta Gallardo was almost certainly used by the Germans in the hope of establishing a private Mexican army that would be sympathetic to Nazi goals on the United States's southern border. When Germany's plan for global conquest didn't work out, Cuesta Gallardo returned to Mexico but remained an ardent fascist and antiSemite.Cuesta Gallardo settled in Guadalajara, the financial center of Mexico and its second-largest city; it is as well the historical home of the Cristeros. According to a report by an American League member in 1973, "Today he leads a most secluded life in Guadalajara, never appearing in public. His house is a disguised fortress, well-guarded all the time."Cuesta Gallardo was not idle in his Guadalajara lair. He envisioned a renaissance of the Tecos, this time committed not only to fighting the anti-clerics in Mexico but also to battling all enemies wherever they existed throughout the world. Those enemies included the United States, Jews, Freemasons, and most of the hierarchy of the Vatican Church, for they were all, according to Cuesta Gallardo, conspirators in the Jewish-Freemason-Communist plot to take over the world.When Cuesta Gallardo embarked on this mission in the late 1940s, he could count among his allies the "Nazi priests" whom he had met while he was in Germany. These Catholic clerics had collaborated with Germany and its allies during the war; many were not priests but were regular war criminals who, with Church assistance, had donned robes to facilitate their escape. They were now scattered throughout Western Europe and Latin America. The Tecos' present ties to the "religious leaders" of the Croatian Ustasha and the Romanian Iron Guard most certainly date from their leader's tenure in Berlin.Cuesta recruited a young Mexican intellectual, Raimundo Guerrero, to his cause. Guerrero succeeded in drawing other right-wing students and academics into the Teco cabal and in time assumed its overt leadership. The real power, however, would always remain with the shadowy Cuesta.From the old Mexican Nazi's standpoint, Guerrero was a good choice as protege. In 1952, Guerrero was dispatched to Buenos Aires to represent Mexico at a conference of the World University Organization. There he made contact with other neo-Nazi student groups from around the world. In addition to forging a lasting relationship with the anti-Israel Arab League, it was in Buenos Aires that Guerrero came into contact with the Jesuit priest Julio Meinveille.Meinveille was an ultra-right Argentine ideologue who launched vitriolic literary attacks on the world's "plagues": Jews, Freemasons, and liberal elements of the Catholic Church. By 1952, Meinveille was already the spiritual leader of the Tacuaras, an Argentine secret society of neo-Nazis, and he would become the same for the Tecos. His hate books, including such tracts as The Jew, The Cabal of Progressivism, and Among the Church and the Reich, became the Tecos' Bibles. The Mexicans frequently distributed Meinveille's books at World Anti-Communist League conferences and the aging priest was even invited to be the main speaker at the first CAL conference in Mexico City in 1972.Stefan Possony a professor emeritus at the conservative Hoover Institute at Stanford University and a longtime American League member, investigated the Tecos in the early 1970s. Pointing out Meinveille's importance to the Mexican neo-Nazis he nonetheless portrayed the Argentine in a favorable light:He is a theologian with knowledge in the social sciences, and he is far more scholarly and also more moderate than the rest. He is knowledgable on many aspects of Communism, about which he wrote with wisdom and insight. He produced the overarching interpretation of history on which the reasoning of the Tecos literature is based. But he has also been the victim of obsessive ideas, especially anti-Semitism, in the pursuit of which he resorted to questionable methods. Despite Possony's characterization of Meinveille as a scholarly moderate, the interpretation of history that he gave the Tecos was one of violence, hatred and paranoia. To them, practically all established leaders, whether in the religious, economic, or political fields were traitors and tools of international Zionism. Franklin Roosevelt, Harry S. ("Solomon", according to the Tecos) Truman and Nelson Rockefeller, they believe were all Jews. So too, were several leaders of the Spanish Carlists, a movement best known for its ardent Catholicism and unwavering support of Generalissimo Francisco Franco, and so were conservative and Catholic politicians throughout South and Central America. The Tecos saw and continue to see all their enemies as performing assigned roles toward the secret Jewish plan of global domination. And their "enemies" quickly became an even larger bloc upon the inclusion of the Vatican Church under Pope John XXIII.Although many conservative Catholics were disturbed by what they saw as the liberal bent of the Pope and by the decrees that emerged from Vatican Council II in 1962 none reacted as bitterly or as blasphemously as the Mexican Tecos did in authoring the Complot contra la Iglesia ("Conspiracy Against the Church"). The Complot remains one of the most scathingly anti-Semitic and unabashedly pro-Nazi tracts ever written. Translated into a half-dozen languages, it was supposedly the work of one "Maurice Pinay", a fictitious name. The Italian edition was distributed at Vatican Council II, causing a minor uproar.We must join forces against Jewish imperialism and liberate our own peoples, all who are being kept captive by Jews, so that after victory over the worst imperialism the world has ever seen ... all countries can form a world organization. That world organization was clearly not to be the United Nations, for the UN is "controlled by the secret power of Jewry and Freemasonry and used for the purpose of securing the triumph of the imperialist schemes hatched by the Synagogue. The Complot went a step further than other apologists had in lamenting Nazi Germany's failure: "If they had confined themselves to saving their nation and Europe from the deadly threat [Judaism] they could not be blamed, and perhaps their commendable enterprise might have succeeded."Many journalists and shocked Church leaders attempted to discover the true identity of the author of the Complot; they came to the conclusion that it was a collaborative effort of European neo-Nazis and Latin American fascists. Actual responsibility, however, belonged to the Tecos, specifically Cuesta Gallardo and Garibi Velasco, another Teco leader; they were its major authors. The Tecos' front man for the hate campaign at Vatican Council II was their theologian, Father Saenz y Arriaga, a Jesuit priest. At the close of the council, he issued a press release "signed by twenty-eight conservative Catholic leaders that attacked the council for having "yielded to the pressures or to the money of Judaism." Most of the signatures were forgeries, and Saenz y Arriaga was later excommunicated.Some of the more moderate Tecos disgusted at the group's actions, broke away to form the Group of Puebla in 1964. The parting was not amicable. To the Tecos, the Pueblas had now proven themselves to be part of the Jewish conspiracy. According to a South American rightist who has followed the Puebla-Teco split, "They've been killing each other ever since. Neither group is composed of saints."END CITATIONSource: Inside The League - THE SHOCKING EXPOSE OF HOW TERRORISTS, NAZIS, AND LATIN AMERICAN DEATH SQUADS HAVE INFILTRATED THE WORLD ANTI-COMMUNIST LEAGUE by Scott L Anderson and Jon Lee Anderson (link)

Generic placeholder image
On a dispiriting journey through invaded Britain, we see the invaders have few doubts about which party represents them. The real question is the one that no one asks, either in this video or in the election more generally: how have the British people benefited from the presence of these primitive people on their island?

Generic placeholder image
The left-wing newspaper Le Nouvel Observateur has published details of secret planning the French elite had done in case Marine Le Pen won the presidency.It first of all assumed that there would be massive civil disorder."Far-left movements, more or less well-established, will no doubt seek to organise demonstrations some of which may result in serious disorder."Two days before the first round of the election, all police chiefs were asked for information about their anti-riot equipment and its readiness for use.As the election went on, private warnings were given about leftists stockpiling fireworks, mortars and weapons that could have inflicted serious casualties.The most extraordinary element of the plan was the intention to force Marine Le Pen to keep the then current Socialist prime minister Bernard Cazeneuve until the next legislative elections. He would simply have refused to leave. The state would therefore be effectively paralysed with one sole priority: maintaining public order.Source


About   Privacy   Disclaimer   Fair Use   Contact
Twitter   Gab   Google+   YouTube   Pinterest   Facebook   V Votable   Minds
Copyright © 2017 - All rights reserved AgendaOfEvil.com