American Intelligence Media

American Intelligence Media

alt

The American Intelligence Media is more than an alternative news site or a cutting-edge news aggregator. Citizens are rewriting history–real time, based on truth, not on the lies of the main stream media and government controlled propaganda. The mission of AIM4Truth is to archive the progress we are making as we find out who we really are and where we really came from and are headed.

Truth News Headlines May 23, 2018
Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:33 AM

.

Dirty Tricks – Trumpgate and Skripal – All Roads Lead to London and MI6

.

House of Representatives, 19 Members, Outline Resolution of FBI and DOJ Misconduct – Request Second Special Counsel

.

Mike Flynn Jr. tweeted

You’re all going down. You know who you are. Mark my word….

MFLYNNJR (@mflynnJRMay 21, 2018

The gloves are off.Source

.

John Brennan’s Plot To Infiltrate The Trump Campaign Exposed

.

Roger Stone: 

“John Brennan should pop the glass capsule and take the cyanide now,” Stone told host Amanda House, Breitbart News’s deputy political editor. “He’s the perp who started the entire Russian dossier matter. He’s lied about it under oath. He’s going to die in a federal penitentiary.” Source

Jack Posobiec at OANN: Second Deep State Government “Informant” Claimed to be with NSA

.

AIM4Truth Lew writes:

Hi guys.

You got selected by whoever controls the traffic to be ‘suspected/accused/determined to be bad for us’ and claimed to be phishing and for us to be on guard!

Keep it up!

Our reply: Yes, this is true. We SUSPECT them, we ACCUSE them, and we have DETERMINED to tell others how bad they have been. Find truth, or dare.

.

.

MSM Desperately Starts Spinning And Distracting From Huge News Revealing FBI Spy Infiltrated Trump Campaign To Frame Him Before Russia Probe Began

.

.

“Flood Is Coming”: New Comey-McCabe Emails Suggest CNN And FBI Coordination Over Steele Dossier

.

.

LEVIN DROPS A MOAB: New Revelation Mueller’s Lawyers Obtained ‘Special Status’ Show Probe is Unconstitutional Under Article II (VIDEO)

.

.

T-Drops in the House

Who needs Q when you have T?

If the person placed very early into my campaign wasn’t a SPY put there by the previous Administration for political purposes, how come such a seemingly massive amount of money was paid for services rendered – many times higher than normal…

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrumpMay 23, 2018

…Follow the money! The spy was there early in the campaign and yet never reported Collusion with Russia, because there was no Collusion. He was only there to spy for political reasons and to help Crooked Hillary win – just like they did to Bernie Sanders, who got duped!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrumpMay 23, 2018

We will be uploading a T-Clearance analysis of last night’s tweets from POTUS on YouTube later today. We checked the trip codes and it is still the real Donald Trump reporting out of twitter.  Stay tuned as author, former NSA cryptologist, rogue Jesuit, and PhD Douglas Gabriel decodes these packed thought forms into multi-layered messages intended for patriots seeking to restore the Republic. Q had Dr. Corsi decoding drops; T has Dr. Gabriel. Do you Q or T?  

.

.

FBI Agents Want Congress To Issue Them Subpoenas So They Can Reveal The Bureau’s Dirt

 .

Life Without Amazon: The “Dizzying And Disorienting” Experience Of Being Banned By Bezos

.

WATCH: Nigel Farage Gets Zuckerberg To Admit Facebook Censorship

..

Word Magic – How Words can be Used as Magic Spells

.


Presidential Tweets Today

.


Weapon of Mass Intelligence

American Intelligence Media free app available on Apple and Android.  You can also load on to your PC here. Our app is a discreet way to check the day’s headlines and truth news.

Truth News Headline posts do not stay on our website permanently. These are current events that are symptoms of the greater history that is evident in our deeply researched foundation articles. The daily headlines “float” on the mountain of evidence that we are amassing for the day of truth and reconciliation or judgement.
If you wish to read and research Truth News Headlines beyond our posting dates, please follow us by email. You will receive Truth News Headlines in an email format which can be saved for as long as you need them.
Our YouTube playlists are organized at: AIM4Truth on YouTube
Betsy and Thomas audios are also arranged in this free ‘glass bead’ by an AIM reader- iTunes podcast link,
Check out the Gabriel bookshelf and join us in a journey towards enlightenment.
Here is a handy Symptom List we created for friends and family that are following the ASCEND protocol.  Learn about our special formula of enzymes here. Vibes Enzymes
Have you tried our recipe for colloidal silver water? The Best Homemade Recipe for Multi-Use Colloidal Silverwater
We are sorry that we cannot answer all of your emails. Please feel free to leave your questions/comments below in the comment box. We have an amazing AIM4Truth community that can help you if we can’t get a response to you.

Notices: Unless marked otherwise, American Intelligence Media (AIM), Aim4Truth.org, copyright claims are waived. Reproduction is permitted with or without attribution. This content and its links may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Truth News Headlines Evening May 22, 2018
Tuesday, May 22, 2018 8:14 PM

 

GOP Takes Six-Point Lead in Midterm Generic Tracking Poll

.

This is an essential step every state needs to take at a time when the federal government seems unlikely to ever end unconstitutional spying on its own.

Signed by the Governor: Michigan Bans “Material Support or Resources” for Warrantless Federal Surveillance

“If the feds wanted to engage in mass surveillance on specific groups or political organizations in Michigan, it will now have to proceed without state or local assistance. This will likely prove problematic.

.

In the meantime, the people of South Carolina fall back into the globalist narrative of protecting Zionism and the Greater Israel Project as it hides behind the Jewish people and religion. Sorry, we don’t buy that old threat any more.

Looks like we are going to need an awareness month just for Zionism. And while we are at it, let’s throw out the dual citizen Senators and Congressional representatives. They have proven their loyalty to Israel is greater than the protection and well-being of the United States. How does Zionism b.s. shut down discussion and debate in your country?

SOUTH CAROLINA TO EQUATE CRITICISM OF ISRAEL WITH ANTI-SEMITISM

While politicians have tried to pass the measure as a standalone law for two years, they finally succeeded temporarily by passing it as a “proviso” that was slipped into the 2018-2019 budget.

.

.

Facebook & Atlantic Council unite: Now social media giant serves NATO’s agenda

.

What is the Atlantic Council, you ask?

EXPOSED: Ukrainian Atlantic Council Connection and the Russian Hacking Hoax

.

Troll Blake writes us:

You two don’t need to be such asses.

Our reply: Oh, yes we do, Blake. You don’t win information wars by being a wimpy warrior. By the way – do you work for Senior Executive Service, Serco, the Greater Israel project, X22 Report, Karen Hudes, Lionel Nation, Solari Report, Your News Wire,  ‘Q’, and/or the Crown?

.

.

T-Drop Starts Storm on Deep State

.

.

.

Trump says summit with North Korea ‘may not work out’ for June 12

.

This glass bead from AIM4Truth Doug. Real Americans Speak Up.

.

Human Rights Activist Files RICO Suit Against Fusion GPS Founders

 .

We know this is very old news about Nellie for our long-time readers, but we have to catch up folks who have only recently joined us.

.

Huma email horror returns to haunt FBI brass, in IG report on Clinton case

.

Thanks to AIM4Truth Vermithrax for this glass bead:

“The following chart, produced by Judicial watch, shows how many more people are registered to vote THAN TOTAL ADULTS IN THE STATE. The chart is actually wrong on the 3.5 million number of fake voters, the actual number is 54.5 million (explained below,) the numbers on this chart by Judicial watch only show there are more people registered than are even alive. There is no conceivable way the election will not be stolen.
IMPORTANT: In reality, 35 percent of all proven living adults in America ARE NOT registered to vote. If that is the case, having the records show more people registered to vote than are even alive positively guarantees an election steal. Even if almost all registered voters voted one way, having more than 35 percent fake votes to add to the Democrat side of the equation will guarantee a win, even if almost all registered voters that are actually alive vote Republican. That’s how bad the system is rigged, WE LOSE. READ IT AND WEEP.  Source

.

Easy Solution: One paper ballot for ID-verified voter and a purple inked finger after voting.

.


.

.

More coming, but here’s some bottom line stuff: The Agenda: Control of global communications for propaganda and brainwashing to control elections and “manage” populations

.

Rt. Hon. Sir Geoffrey Pattie, founding director of Strategic Communication Laboratories Limited, later renamed SCL Group Limited, owner of subsidiary Cambridge Analytica

.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCL_Group (Note how Wikipedia drops any reference to the Rt. Hon. Sir Pattie! Whoops!)

.

But here’s the proof from Companies House:

Founding director of SCL (now wiped from Wikipedia)

Geoffrey E. Pattie. (Nov. 10, 2005). Appointment of director, Form 288a, Strategic Communication Laboratories Limited aka SCL Group Limited, Co. No. 5514098, parent of Cambridge Analytica. Companies House.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_Company (GEC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marconi_Electronic_Systems (MES)

Marconi is now BAE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAE_Systems

BAE Systems is involved in several major defence [sic – the British spelling] projects, including the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II

.


.

Having waited a few days for the Brits to enjoy the big day, we now feature: Secrets of the Royal Wedding Revealed!

.


Presidential Tweets Today

.


Weapon of Mass Intelligence

American Intelligence Media free app available on Apple and Android.  You can also load on to your PC here. Our app is a discreet way to check the day’s headlines and truth news.

Truth News Headline posts do not stay on our website permanently. These are current events that are symptoms of the greater history that is evident in our deeply researched foundation articles. The daily headlines “float” on the mountain of evidence that we are amassing for the day of truth and reconciliation or judgement.
If you wish to read and research Truth News Headlines beyond our posting dates, please follow us by email. You will receive Truth News Headlines in an email format which can be saved for as long as you need them.
Our YouTube playlists are organized at: AIM4Truth on YouTube
Betsy and Thomas audios are also arranged in this free ‘glass bead’ by an AIM reader- iTunes podcast link,
Check out the Gabriel bookshelf and join us in a journey towards enlightenment.
Here is a handy Symptom List we created for friends and family that are following the ASCEND protocol.  Learn about our special formula of enzymes here. Vibes Enzymes
Have you tried our recipe for colloidal silver water? The Best Homemade Recipe for Multi-Use Colloidal Silverwater
We are sorry that we cannot answer all of your emails. Please feel free to leave your questions/comments below in the comment box. We have an amazing AIM4Truth community that can help you if we can’t get a response to you.

Notices: Unless marked otherwise, American Intelligence Media (AIM), Aim4Truth.org, copyright claims are waived. Reproduction is permitted with or without attribution. This content and its links may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Truth News Headlines May 22, 2018
Tuesday, May 22, 2018 11:19 AM

 

SUMMONED TO THE WHITE HOUSE “To receive an ORDER directly from the President”

.

.

Trump Meeting With Rosenstein, Wray On Spying Concludes: Congress To See All “Highly Classified” Information

.

Trump charges John Kelly with getting Russia probe documents to Congress

.

Three Major Ways John Brennan Fueled the Trump-Russia Conspiracy Theory

.

.

.

Betsy and Thomas say, “Who needs Q when you have T?”

Decoding Trump Tweets May 21, 2018

.

.

.

Devastating 2016 Strzok Text Found: Obama’s WH is Running Trump Investigation

.

.

NEW Podesta Emails Reveal Lobbying w/ Pro-Russian Entities in Ukraine

.

Video: CONFIRMATION that Obama Admin. Spied on Trump Campaign

.

President Trump Meets With DAG Rosenstein, FBI Director Wray and DNI Dan Coats to Establish White House/DOJ Expectations

.

GOP Lawmakers Vow to Drop Hammer in Next 24 Hours on FBI-DOJ Corruption in Public Smackdown

.

IG Has NO POWER TO SUBPOENA Former Obama Employees — That’s Why Rosenstein Asked Him to Investigate Spying on Trump

.

Matt Gaetz’s ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ Interview on Sessions and Spy Scandal

.

 

.

Karen Hudes proclaims that “Donald Trump is Traitor and Liar“, stating that only she is “real and standing in” to free us.

.

Is that Karen at the end of the table at this Camp David meeting? https://8ch.net/thestorm/res/20966.html

.

SCL – A Very British Coup And Have Close Ties To Her Majesty’s Government. Digital Spy.

.

SCL and the Phantom Contract. Bella Caledonia.org.

SCL Group is the parent company of Cambridge Analytica. They share directors and practise and are for all intents and purposes part of the same organisation. Between them they claim to have influenced over 200 elections in the world.

.

All Roads Lead to the Queen

.

FBI Informant Stefan Halper Paid Over $1 Million By Obama Admin; Spied On Trump Aide After Election

.

Obama DoD Paid ‘FBI Informant’ Stefan Halper over $250,000 Right Before 2016 Election

.

FBI ‘Informant’ Stefan Halper Pitched Himself For Senior Position in Trump White House

.

Sir Richard Dearlove & UK Intelligence Ties

.

Eric Holder: ‘No Basis’ for Trump to Investigate FBI Election Meddling

.

Witness Said Awan Wiretapped Her, Then Bank Account She Controlled Was Drained

.

Get the message out the best way you can. Everyone has different talents, skills, resources, and audiences. We aren’t limited to Facebook and Twitter. Go big and think out of the box. If the project is too big for you alone, gather some friends and get ‘er done.

Be A Patriot Entrepreneur!

.

Dems’ alleged ‘blue wave’ can’t compete with GOP’s ‘GREEN wave’ of campaign CASH

.

2 Lava Rivers Hit the Pacific/Large Clouds of Hydrochloric Acid

.

.

Be on alert for False Flags. We have pointed out that SERCO has the contracts for FEMA in this zone.

The powder keg is full: You have the globalists on the run, the UN needs your guns, and the loonies are running the world. So be on the look-out and PAY ATTENTION.

Arizona prepares for statewide drill to practice how it would respond to a migration of 400,000 people in case of a catastrophic California earthquake

.

.

.

 

Jeff Carlson. (May 20, 2018). Sir Richard Dearlove & UK Intelligence Ties. The Market Works.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-05-20-Sir-Richard-Dearlove-and-UK-Intelligence-Ties-by-Jeff-Carlson-The-Market-Works-May-20-2018.pdf


Presidential Tweets Today

.


Weapon of Mass Intelligence

American Intelligence Media free app available on Apple and Android.  You can also load on to your PC here. Our app is a discreet way to check the day’s headlines and truth news.

Truth News Headline posts do not stay on our website permanently. These are current events that are symptoms of the greater history that is evident in our deeply researched foundation articles. The daily headlines “float” on the mountain of evidence that we are amassing for the day of truth and reconciliation or judgement.
If you wish to read and research Truth News Headlines beyond our posting dates, please follow us by email. You will receive Truth News Headlines in an email format which can be saved for as long as you need them.
Our YouTube playlists are organized at: AIM4Truth on YouTube
Betsy and Thomas audios are also arranged in this free ‘glass bead’ by an AIM reader- iTunes podcast link,
Check out the Gabriel bookshelf and join us in a journey towards enlightenment.
Here is a handy Symptom List we created for friends and family that are following the ASCEND protocol.  Learn about our special formula of enzymes here. Vibes Enzymes
Have you tried our recipe for colloidal silver water? The Best Homemade Recipe for Multi-Use Colloidal Silverwater
We are sorry that we cannot answer all of your emails. Please feel free to leave your questions/comments below in the comment box. We have an amazing AIM4Truth community that can help you if we can’t get a response to you.

Notices: Unless marked otherwise, American Intelligence Media (AIM), Aim4Truth.org, copyright claims are waived. Reproduction is permitted with or without attribution. This content and its links may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Truth News Headlines May 21, 2018
Monday, May 21, 2018 10:58 AM

Americans Stand with Trump to Defeat the Enemies Within

.

Forget Q. That’s history. Meet T.

.

Halper: Senior Executive Service Spy

.

DoJ Confirms Inspector General Will Probe “Impropriety, Political Motivation” Of Obama FBI Spying On Trump

.

New Evidence of Foreign Government Meddling in 2016 Election Finally Uncovered — But it was from the UK – not Russia!

Based on information to date, the UK had more to do with interfering with the US 2016 Presidential election than Russia.  The Obama team and the Clinton campaign spied on the Trump Administration and used the entire government apparatus, including the CIA, FBI, the DOJ and others, to do so.  It appears, they also had help from the UK.

These crooks were willing to risk World War III with Russia rather than face a Trump Presidency.  This all leads to the question – What is so damn damning that these many individuals would go to such brazen lengths to remove President Trump from office?

.

John Brennan’a Latest Cryptic Tweet Has People Asking ‘Is This a Threat to Trump?’

.

If FBI had Spy on Trump “It’s Over” – No Honest American Will Stand for This

.

Donald Trump Orders Justice Department to Investigate Obama Surveillance

.

Devin Nunes doesn’t rule out possibility of multiple FBI informants in Trump campaign

.

.

.

AIM4Truther Nicholas writes:

I noticed you mentioned Roger Stone in your latest YT.  His claim that Trump will not run for re-election is odd, to say the least.  What could explain this bizarre behavior?
Could it be related to the fact that Roger Stone used to work for NXIVM?

All About NXIVM, the Cultlike Organization With Ties to Albany

October 4, 2007

“A couple of days ago, the Post broke the news that Roger Stone — a former state GOP functionary who resigned after allegedly threatening Eliot Spitzer’s family — was procuring money for Joe Bruno and pals from his other employer, a cultlike organization called NXIVM. Needless to say, we’ve been obsessed with the Albany-based NXIVM (pronounced, believe it or not, like “Nexium”) ever since. It’s basically like Scientology masquerading as a self-help seminar, run by a guy named Keith Raniere.”

.

.

President Trump Tweets Official Investigative Request To DOJ Forthcoming

.

An Email Referring To ‘Collusion’ Sheds Light On Cambridge Prof’s Interactions With Trump Aide

.
.

.

.

Mr. President, We the People Have Your Back

.

.

Rivers of fast-moving lava flow from Hawaii’s volcano

.


Presidential Tweets Today

.


Weapon of Mass Intelligence

American Intelligence Media free app available on Apple and Android.  You can also load on to your PC here. Our app is a discreet way to check the day’s headlines and truth news.

Truth News Headline posts do not stay on our website permanently. These are current events that are symptoms of the greater history that is evident in our deeply researched foundation articles. The daily headlines “float” on the mountain of evidence that we are amassing for the day of truth and reconciliation or judgement.
If you wish to read and research Truth News Headlines beyond our posting dates, please follow us by email. You will receive Truth News Headlines in an email format which can be saved for as long as you need them.
Our YouTube playlists are organized at: AIM4Truth on YouTube
Betsy and Thomas audios are also arranged in this free ‘glass bead’ by an AIM reader- iTunes podcast link,
Check out the Gabriel bookshelf and join us in a journey towards enlightenment.
Here is a handy Symptom List we created for friends and family that are following the ASCEND protocol.  Learn about our special formula of enzymes here. Vibes Enzymes
Have you tried our recipe for colloidal silver water? The Best Homemade Recipe for Multi-Use Colloidal Silverwater
We are sorry that we cannot answer all of your emails. Please feel free to leave your questions/comments below in the comment box. We have an amazing AIM4Truth community that can help you if we can’t get a response to you.

Notices: Unless marked otherwise, American Intelligence Media (AIM), Aim4Truth.org, copyright claims are waived. Reproduction is permitted with or without attribution. This content and its links may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
We are with President Trump for FBI/DOJ Total Disclosure
Sunday, May 20, 2018 6:24 PM

.

….as we were saying earlier today

.

White Wind Tribe’s answer to “CROSSFIRE HURRICANE”

.

.

.

.

.

“O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive” the story of Google, Perkins Coie, CrowdStrike, Fusion GPS, Clinton, Soros and many other players.

.

AIM4Truth Joe nailed this image for Serco Awareness Month! This is exactly who is behind the human spraying project – SERCO – which we track back to the Queen’s Golden Share!

…and now we have the paper trail that takes us to the ultimate owner and controller of  the global control matrix.

.

EXPOSED: All the Queen’s Agents and Corporations that Control the World

.

Forget Q. That’s history. Meet T.

 

.


Presidential Tweets Today

.


Weapon of Mass Intelligence

American Intelligence Media free app available on Apple and Android.  You can also load on to your PC here. Our app is a discreet way to check the day’s headlines and truth news.

Truth News Headline posts do not stay on our website permanently. These are current events that are symptoms of the greater history that is evident in our deeply researched foundation articles. The daily headlines “float” on the mountain of evidence that we are amassing for the day of truth and reconciliation or judgement.
If you wish to read and research Truth News Headlines beyond our posting dates, please follow us by email. You will receive Truth News Headlines in an email format which can be saved for as long as you need them.
Our YouTube playlists are organized at: AIM4Truth on YouTube
Betsy and Thomas audios are also arranged in this free ‘glass bead’ by an AIM reader- iTunes podcast link,
Check out the Gabriel bookshelf and join us in a journey towards enlightenment.
Here is a handy Symptom List we created for friends and family that are following the ASCEND protocol.  Learn about our special formula of enzymes here. Vibes Enzymes
Have you tried our recipe for colloidal silver water? The Best Homemade Recipe for Multi-Use Colloidal Silverwater
We are sorry that we cannot answer all of your emails. Please feel free to leave your questions/comments below in the comment box. We have an amazing AIM4Truth community that can help you if we can’t get a response to you.

Notices: Unless marked otherwise, American Intelligence Media (AIM), Aim4Truth.org, copyright claims are waived. Reproduction is permitted with or without attribution. This content and its links may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
The British Crown Runs the U.S. Legal System
Friday, May 4, 2018 6:59 PM

In our continuing efforts to shed more light upon the connections between America and Britain, we would like to show that the U. S. legal system is not only built upon the British Bar, but is, in fact, still subject to it. This idea that the British monarchy “controls everything” in the world is usually considered a conspiracy. But once you have read excerpts from The Crown Temple by Rule of the Mystery Babylon below, you may find yourself re-examining true history of U. S. law.

History is often more shocking than fiction, and in this case it is extremely so.

The American Intelligence Media recently posted an article showing that the British system of secret committees and privileges for the elite are still operative today, as they have been for centuries. No one may formally ask about the British Crown’s “business”; therefore, few Americans or Brits know much at all about the economic insider trading and manipulations in which the Queen of England is embroiled.

In this presentation we point out that every law, attorney, and judicial system of America has arisen from a most dubious and un-democratic system that favors the rich and keeps the commoners in the dark. We hope to shed light on this ancient system that actually arose from Vatican Canon Law and has now reached into every country in the Western world. Our Western system of law tends towards lawlessness and its origins go back to the middle ages where the rule of the monarchy was a divine right of kings and commoners had few, if any, rights.

Let’s get started by establishing the historical parameters of U. S. law that common history would recognize as free from conspiracy theories, but presents facts that are little known by Americans, even American lawyers. We can take our start from Wikipedia:

The Honorable Society of the Inner Temple, commonly known as the Inner Temple, is one of the four Inns of Court (professional associations for barristers and judges) in London. To be called to the Bar and practice as a barrister in England and Wales, an individual must belong to one of these Inns. It is located in the wider Temple area of the capital, near the Royal Courts of Justice, and within the City of London.

The Inn is a professional body that provides legal training, selection, and regulation for members. It is ruled by a governing council called “Parliament”, made up of the Masters of the Bench (or “Benchers”), and led by the Treasurer. The Temple takes its name from the Knights Templar, who originally leased the land to the Temple’s inhabitants (Templars) until their abolition in 1312. The Inner Temple was a distinct society from at least 1388.

The Inner Temple is one of the four Inns of Court, along with Gray’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, and the Middle Temple. The Inns are responsible for training, regulating, and selecting barristers within England and Wales, and are the only bodies allowed to call a barrister to the Bar and allow him or her to practice.

The Temple is an independent, unincorporated organization, and works as a trust. It has approximately 8,000 members and around 450 apply to join per year. Although the Inn was previously a disciplinary and teaching body, these functions are now shared between the four Inns, with the Bar Standards Board (a division of the General Council of the Bar) acting as a disciplinary.

During the 12th and 13th centuries, the law was taught in the City of London, primarily by the clergy. During the 13th century, two events happened that ended this form of legal education; first, a papal bull of 1207 that prohibited the clergy from teaching the common law, rather than canon law, and second, a decree by King Henry III on 2 December 1234 that no institutes of legal education could exist in the City of London. As a result, the Church ceased to have a role in legal education in London.

It may come as a shock that when you ask about U. S. law, you get a description of ancient Roman, Vatican, and British references about which Americans know little. Most people would disagree that U. S. law has anything to do with such archaic forms of secret societies and groups that take vows to the Crown, both the Templar Crown and the British Royal Crown.

One of the best articles we have came across that explains the historical roots of U. S. law is from Michael Edward. We do not recommend the entire article and therefore have chosen selections from the article that illuminate the foundations of British law that effect U. S. law. We hope that you will find the article helpful in our efforts to clearly elucidate the current web of control that the City of London UK still has over U. S. citizens.

.

Extracts from: The Crown Temple by Rule of the Mystery Babylon

by Michael Edward (Ecclesiastic Commonwealth Community)

.

The Crown Temple

The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, are owned by the “Crown,” which is a private foreign power. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the “Crown.” From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous.

The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple “Church” is outside any canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed patent, without induction or institution.

All licensed Bar Attorneys – Attorners – in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not.

This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple. Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.

The Inns of Court to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London – a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800s, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law. They are known collectively as the “Crown.” Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers.

The present Queen of England is not the “Crown,” as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple.

The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.

The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies.

The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery – the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane – a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent “legal” – but totally unlawful – contracts on the American people.

The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim’s judiciary.

The first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts.

By what authority has the “Crown” usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being “constitutional” when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U. S. Government?

The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations.

The Four Inns of Court

There are Four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private clubs and secret societies of power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200’s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray’s Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown.

Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated so that you can’t make claims against them. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. They exist as secret societies without a public “front door” unless you’re a private member “called to their Bar.”

While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to fleece Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license to fleece America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honorable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown Temple.

From, The History of the Inn, Later Centuries, written by the Honorable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America:

“Call to the Bar, or keeping terms in one of the four Inns was a pre-requisite to Call at King’s Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands to do so. The Inn’s records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812.”

All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or “called to Bar” at any of the King’s Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.

It’s a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American Declaration of Independence.

This simply means that both parties to the Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. It’s merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same.

In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members.

By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King’s College in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King’s Inns, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution. In 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had completed a three-year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association was/ is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year’s service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esquire.

In February of 1784, Hamilton wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State’s first bank. He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five-hour speech on June 18th, he stated “an Executive for life will be an elective Monarch.” When all his anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies).

One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown – a Crown Colony. This is an example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple – Middle Templars – have taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements.

Later, as President Washington’s U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain.

Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were, nor are they today. They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.

Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but “legal”, Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our so-called “judiciary” in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.

What happened in 1776?

1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called “States” as direct possessive estates of the Crown.

The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word “State” to signify a “legal estate of possession.” Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word “states.”

By the use of “State,” the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.

All “Constitutional Rights” in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States Government. When a “State Citizen” attempts to invoke his “constitutional”, natural, or common law “rights” in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don’t apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown “law.” Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God’s Law.

The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognized only within natural and common law as is already established by God’s Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn’t legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction).

Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no “law” within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of God, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal “Person” of fictional “status” (another legal term) in order for their legal – but completely unlawful – State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of “justice” are decided by 3 “judges.” This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts.

The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent and Charters for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governors such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted “independence.” Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution.

To have this “Declaration” recognized by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, “between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States.” The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate “United States”, the new Crown Temple States (Colonies).

Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation “Esqr.” following their names as this legally signifies “Officers of the King’s Courts”, which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton.

The Crown was represented in signature by “David Hartley, Esqr.”, a Middle Templar of the King’s Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was “John Adams, Esqr”, “Benjamin Franklin, Esqr.” and “John Jay, Esqr.” The signatories for the “United States” were also Middle Templars of the King’s Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement.

It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part, “to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects.”

The Crown Colonies were granted to “persons” and corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown.

.

.

Now, here’s a real catch-all in Article 4:

“It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.”

Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the legal Crown States. So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883? In the Contract between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,

“It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit…”

That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton’s U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.

An additional $6 million dollars was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans.

The Fiscal Agents

Since its beginnings, the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It’s very important to know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman Church.

This all becomes very clear through the Concession of England to the Pope on May 15, 1213, a charter that swore fealty by England’s King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same, “I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars.”

Most who have commented on this charter often emphasize the payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British Empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope.

The Bar Association

In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys but most held no title of nobility or honor. There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen counsel of choice was not restricted to a lawyer; there were no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London, and closely associated with international banking systems.

Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank of Esquire – a title of nobility – Esquire was the principle title of nobility which the 13th Amendment sought to prohibit from the United States. The loyalty of Esquire lawyers was suspect. Bankers and lawyers with an Esquire behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members of an organization whose principle purposes were political, not economic.

Article 1, Sect. 9 of the Constitution sought to prohibit the International Bar Association (or any other agency that granted titles of nobility) from operating in America. But the Constitution neglected to specify a penalty, so the prohibition was ignored, and agents of the crown continued to infiltrate and influence the government.

Therefore, a title of nobility amendment that specified a penalty (loss of citizenship) was proposed in 1789, and again in 1810. The meaning of the amendment is seen in its intent to prohibit persons having titles of nobility and loyal-ties to foreign governments and bankers from voting, holding public office, or using their skills to subvert the government.

Paradise Lost, Ratification Found

In 1789, the House of Representatives compiled a list of possible Constitutional Amendments, some of which would ultimately become our Bill of Rights. The House proposed seventeen; the Senate reduced the list to twelve. During this process Senator Tristrain Dalton (Mass.) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for any American accepting a title of Nobility. Although it wasn’t passed, this was the first time a title of nobility amendment was proposed.

Twenty years later, in January, 1810, Senator Reed proposed another Title of Nobility Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

The Constitution requires three-quarters of the states to ratify a proposed amendment before it may be added to the Constitution. When Congress proposed the Title of Nobility Amendment in 1810, there were seventeen states, thirteen of which would have to ratify for the Amendment to be adopted. According to the National Archives, the following is a list of the twelve states that ratified, and their dates of ratification:

Maryland, Dec. 25, 1810

Kentucky, Jan. 31, 1811

Ohio, Jan. 31, 1811

Delaware, Feb. 2, 1811

Pennsylvania, Feb. 6, 1811

New Jersey, Feb. 13, 1811

Vermont, Oct. 24, 1811

Tennessee, Nov. 21, 1811

Georgia, Dec. 13, 1811

North Carolina, Dec. 23, 1811

Massachusetts, Feb. 27, 1812

New Hampshire, Dec. 10, 1812

Before a thirteenth state could ratify, the War of 1812 broke out with England. By the time the war ended in 1814, the British had burned the Capitol, the Library of Congress, and most of the records of the first 38 years of government. Whether there was a connection between the proposed title of nobility amendment and the War of 1812 is not known. However, the momentum to ratify the proposed Amendment was lost in the tumult of war.

Then, four years later, on December 31, 1817, the House of Representatives resolved that President Monroe inquire into the status of this Amendment. In a letter dated February 6, 1818, President Monroe reported to the House that the Secretary of State Adams had written to the governors of Virginia, South Carolina and Connecticut to tell them that the proposed Amendment had been ratified by twelve States and rejected by two (New York and Rhode Island), and asked the governors to notify him of their legislature’s position. [House Document No. 76].

This, and other letters written by the President and the Secretary of State during the month of February, 1818, note only that the proposed Amendment had not yet been ratified. However, these letters would later become crucial because, in the absence of additional information, they would be interpreted to mean the amendment was never ratified.

On February 28, 1818, Secretary of State Adams reported the rejection of the Amendment by South Carolina. [House Doc. No. 129]. There are no further entries regarding the ratification of the 13th Amendment in the Journals of Congress; whether Virginia ratified is neither confirmed nor denied. Likewise, a search through the executive papers of Governor Preston of Virginia does not reveal any correspondence from Secretary of State Adams.

Significance of Removal

To create the present oligarchy (rule by lawyers) which the U.S. now endures, the lawyers first had to remove the 13th Titles of Nobility Amendment that might otherwise have kept them in check. In fact, it was not until after the Civil War and after the disappearance of this 13th Amendment, that American bar associations began to appear and exercise political power.

Since the unlawful deletion of the 13th Amendment, the newly developing bar associations began working diligently to create a system wherein lawyers took on a title of privilege and nobility as ‘Esquires’ and received the honor of offices and positions (like district attorney or judge) that only they could hold.

By virtue of these titles, honors, and special privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority of U.S. citizens.

Through these privileges, they have nearly established a two-tiered citizenship in this nation where a majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run the system.

This two-tiered citizenship is clearly contrary to American’s political interests, the nation’s economic welfare, and the Constitution’s egalitarian spirit. The significance of this missing 13th Amendment and its deletion from the Constitution is this: Since the amendment was never lawfully nullified, it is still in full force and effect and is the Law of the land.

If public support could be awakened, this missing Amendment might provide a legal basis to challenge many existing laws and court decisions previously made by lawyers who were unconstitutionally elected or appointed to their positions of power; it might even mean the removal of lawyers from the current U. S. government system.

At the very least, this missing 13th Amendment demonstrates that two centuries ago, lawyers were recognized as enemies of the people and nation.

Those Who Cannot Recall History…

In his farewell address, George Washington warned of “…change by usurpation; for through this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”

In 1788, Thomas Jefferson proposed that we have a Declaration of Rights similar to Virginia’s. Three of his suggestions were “freedom of commerce against monopolies, trial by jury in all cases, and no suspensions of the habeas corpus.”

No doubt Washington’s warning and Jefferson’s ideas were dismissed as redundant by those who knew the law. Who would have dreamed the U.S. legal system would become a monopoly against freedom when that was one of the primary causes for the rebellion against King George III?

Yet, the denial of trial by jury is now commonplace in the U.S. courts, and habeas corpus, for crimes against the state, is suspended. By crimes against the state, I refer to political crimes where there is no injured party and the corpus delicti [evidence] is equally imaginary.

The authority to create monopolies was judge-made law by Supreme Court Justice John Marshall, et al during the early 1800’s. Judges (and lawyers) granted to themselves the power to declare the acts of the People un-Constitutional, waited until their decision was grandfathered, and then granted themselves a monopoly by creating the bar associations. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution mandates that “executive orders and treaties are binding upon the states… and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

However, the Supreme Court has held that the Bill of Rights is not binding upon the states, and thereby resurrected many of the complaints enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, exactly as Thomas Jefferson foresaw in Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 17, p.161, 1784:

“Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless…the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is [now] while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, by in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion.”

After hearing these words, two key questions remain:

  • Will we fight to revive our rights? Or,
  • Will we meekly submit as our last remaining rights expire, surrendered to the courts

Dismantling the Federal Courts

The following court rulings clearly demonstrate that U. S. district and appeal courts are not Districts Courts of the United States and therefore are unlawfully operating under a false pretense. It is due to these examples of case law that we have the precedent to shut down all falsely established U. S. District and Appeal Courts that are not within the boundary of Washington D. C., which is the only place they may legally operate.

From Case Law

“The term “District Courts of the United States”, as used in the rules, without an addition expressing a wider connotation, has its historic significance but is misinterpreted in its application. It describes the constitutional courts created under Article III of the Constitution. Courts of the Territories are legislative courts, properly speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States. We have often held that vesting a territorial court with jurisdiction similar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a “District Court of the United States.”

(Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 154; The City of Panama, 101 U.S. 453,460; In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 268; McAllister v. United States, 141 U.S. 174, 182, 183; Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U.S. 445, 476, 477; Summers v. United States, 231 U.S. 92, 101, 102; United States v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159,163. Cited in MOOKINI v. UNITED STATES, 303 U.S. 201, 205, 1938)

“By section 1910 of the Revised Statutes, the district courts of the Territory have the same jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the circuit and district courts of the United States; but this does not make them circuit and district courts of the United States.”

(Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 154, 1878)

“Courts of the kind, whether created by an act of Congress or a territorial statute, are not, in strictness, courts of the United States; or, in other words, the jurisdiction with which they are invested is not a part of the judicial power defined by the third article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of the general power which the legislative department possesses to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the public territory and other public property.”

(THE CITY OF PANAMA., 101 U.S. 453, 460, 1879.)

“District and Circuit Courts … do not apply to the court established in the Indian Territory …although the latter is a court of the United States, it is not a District or Circuit Court of the United States.”

(Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 154; Ex parte Farley, Ex parte Wilson, 40 F. 66.” In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 268, 1890)

“It must be admitted that the words ‘United States District Court’ were not accurately used, …was not a District or Circuit Court of the United States, In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 268, and no such court had, at the date of the act, jurisdiction therein.”

(Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U.S. 445, 476, 477, 1899)

“…designation of a tribunal as a court of the United States, does not constitute it a district court.”

(In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 267-8; Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U.S. 445. Cited in United States v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159,163)

“By section 1910 of the Revised Statutes the District Courts of the Territory have the same jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the Circuit and District Courts of the United States; but this does not make them Circuit and District Courts of the United States.”

(McAllister v. United States, 141 U.S. 174, 182, 183-184, 1891)

“It is established that the courts of the Territories may have such jurisdiction of cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the circuit and district courts, but this does not make them circuit and district courts of the United States.”

(SUMMERS v. United States Code)

.

Government Rules Concerning Federal Courts

The people of the United States had ordained with the constitution how the district courts of the United States were to be applied in Article III. Congress tricked Americans into believing that the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT is one and the same as the district courts of the United States. The U. S. Congress tried to overrule the U. S. Constitution by creating many extra “federal” courts that claim a higher authority over state courts. This is federalism expanding into the court system, where it should have no authority at all, let alone a “higher” authority.

Not only did the promulgating order use the term District Courts of the United States in its historic and proper sense, but the omission of provision for the application of the rules to the territorial courts and other courts mentioned in the authorizing act clearly shows the limitation that was intended. District Courts of the United States, as used in the rules describes the constitutional courts created under article 3 of the Constitution. Courts of the Territories are legislative courts, properly speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States thereby vesting a territorial court with jurisdiction similar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a ‘District Court of the United States.’

  1. The district courts of the United States are Article III courts pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789 unless expressly defined to the contrary.
  1. The United States District Courts are legislative courts where Congress has legislative powers to exercise the its/their territory i.e. Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and District of Columbia.

Let’s look at some governmental rules, regulations, and laws that address the issue again and again that US District Courts do not exist in states.

District Courts Defined by Law

TITLE 18 — APPENDIX FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE  IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The phrase “district courts of the United States” was held not to include district courts in the territories and insular possessions, Mookini v. United States, 303 U.S. 201. By subsequent legislation the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were extended to the District Court of the United States for Hawaii and to appeals therefrom (Act of June 19, 1939; 53 Stat. 841; 48 U.S.C. § 646) and to the District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico and to appeals therefrom (Act of February 12, 1940; 54 Stat. 22; 48 U.S.C. § 873a).

NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES — 1948 AMENDMENT

Subdivision (a)(1). – To conform to the nomenclature of revised Title 28 with respect to district courts and courts of appeals (28 U.S.C. § 132(a), 43(a)); to eliminate special reference to the district courts for the District of Columbia, Hawaii and Puerto Rico which are now United States district courts for all purposes (28 U.S.C. § 88, 91, 119, 132, 133, 451), and to eliminate special reference to the court of appeals for the District of Columbia which is now a United States court of appeals for all purposes (28 U.S.C. § 41, 43).

Title 4 §72. CHAPTER 3 – SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT

Sec. 72. Public offices; at seat of Government

“All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law. Courts of the Territories are legislative courts, properly speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States. We have often held that vesting a territorial court with jurisdiction similar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a ‘District Court of the United States.”

(Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 , 154; The City of Panama, 101 U.S. 453 , 460; In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 268 , 10 S.Ct. 762; McAllister v. United States, 141 U.S. 174, 182 , 183 S., 11 S.Ct. 949; Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U.S. 445, 476 , 477 S., 19 S.Ct. 722; Summers v. United States, 231 U.S. 92, 101 , 102 S., 34 S.Ct. 38; United States v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159, 163 , 53 S.Ct. 574.)

A Possible Solution to the Justice Department Corruption

The Sixth and Seventh Amendments to the U. S. Constitution provide specific mandates, which,which taken together with the ninth, tenth, first, and other amendments; provide a larger frame-work for the “De-Centralization of Judicial Power.”

The Sixth Amendment specifically references the “Districts”, wherein the obviously necessary “Judicial Power” is to be Invoked, in order to prosecute the cases and execute the Judgements arrived at thereunder.

Those “Districts” are referred to in case law, as representing “Precincts”; and linkages therein to authority to exercise this general jurisdiction. Further references to “Judicial Power” are found in the following web-linked Oregon Statutes:

In the first link above, please note that the word “Precincts” is definitely and clearly used in reference to this “Judicial Power.”

Powers of other Judicial Officers; Where Powers may be Exercised.

The other links demonstrate the vast power that has been statutorily-recognized as legitimately residing there-in.

Powers of Judicial Officers.

Powers of Courts – in administration of court business & proceedings.

Presently there are approximately 180,000 official “Precincts” in American; with about another 120,000 roughly equivalent “Polling Places” also involved which is shown on pages 2 and 11 of the following official document:

Election Day Survey on precincts and polling places.

This idea for the “De-Centralization of the Judicial Power”, is obviously part of the “Original Intent” of our U. S. Constitution as the supreme governing document.

The vast majority of these courts and offices are presently “vacant”; and that means that they can be claimed and exercised by anyone, at least until “cause shown” is presented as to why those presumptive “Justice-of-the-Peace” precinct-level judicial offices are somehow not being legitimately exercised, or else that, in some way, their verdicts, judgements, and/or orders, are otherwise defective.

The “Montana Freemen” were exercising this “Judicial-Power”, from their common law jurisdiction “Justus Township”; and the commercial instruments they were distributing to taxpayers to send to the IRS, received “Tax Refunds” back from the IRS.

A Federal Judge apparently recognized LeRoy Schweitzer therein as a legitimate “Justice-of-the-Peace” and “Judicial-Officer.”

Index of /Archive/SchweitzerFiles

http://constitutionalgov.us/Archive/SchweitzerFiles/LeRoy.WMV

The following links perhaps presenting the best version thereof:

The “Basis-In-Law” for Common People Organizing Local Smaller Constitutional “Township” Communities.

Fundamental Principles of American Constitutional Law and Government.

Memorandum/Article in Support of the Common American People Directly Prosecuting Quo-Warranto/State-Ex-Rel Criminal Complaints

Remaking of the Federal Court System

In terms of federal court corruption: I have never understood the idea that the ‘state’ can be harmed. If the state can be harmed, then it takes precedence over the individual. The ‘state’ is a fiction, but the individual is ‘real.’ The state’s ownership of anything is also a legal fiction, but the individual’s property is ‘real.’ In the current court system, the state has legal precedent over the individual, if not by ‘legal definition’ as set forth under the Constitution, then by ‘case law practice.’

This preference by the court is ‘observable’ as an output phenomenon of the court’s rulings. This is why so many people are being wrongfully prosecuted when the ‘natural law’ against the ‘individual’ or ‘moral’ underpinnings in the case have no bearing. We see this as a result of ‘contrived case law’ interpretations that, if uncontested, are used as foundations for ‘further’ contrivances that finally ‘inch’ society as a whole away from the original foundational laws that supported individuals over the ‘state’, the ‘federal courts’ and ‘corporations.’

When a ‘legal fiction’ has precedence over anything ‘real’, a case can be contrived by evil minds for self-benefit over anything. In short, the court system has been undermined using dialectic arguments to move the American Republic away from the sanctity of the individual to support the totalitarian principles of obedience by an elite. It is very simple to understand and observe.

The only way to reverse this trend, is to ‘hold’ accountable our elected officials to the principles of the U. S. Constitution and not ‘case law’ in capricious courts. All of the fictions can be reversed very quickly by ‘winning’ court cases that ‘challenge’ the fictions. One would have to define the priority list of un-constitutional principles, find existing instances where they are propped up by ‘case law fictions’ without actual jury trials, and then challenge them through individuals representing the U. S. Constitution and the U. S. Bill of Rights.

A tsunami of these would begin to drive public awareness and fear into the current circuit courts and perhaps cause the court of public opinion to motivate Congress to revisit all interpretations of Federal courts and their authority.

Federalism vs. State’s Rights

The federal government is a subcontractor hired by our states to provide the nineteen enumerated services described in the Constitution. The 1824 Webster’s Dictionary clearly states that the word “federal” is a synonym for “contract.”

The “federal government” is a “contract government.” It is here to provide “essential government services” as stated by Article IV of the U. S. Constitution. The “federal government” is foreign with respect to “we the people” and our states of the Union.

In 1860, the British-backed Territorial Government began an illegal commercial mercenary action against another branch of the federal government – some of the member states of the American states union formed in 1781 under the Articles of Confederation. This is similar to what they have perpetuated innumerable times since in other places around the world, for the purpose of commandeering our National Government and putting their own puppet Territorial Government in charge. They were successful in doing this because they used clever semantic deceits and substitutions to fool the public into believing that nothing had changed.

Specifically, they removed the original State of States operating as “State of Florida”, for example, and substituted their own territorial “State of Florida” organization instead, so that it appeared superficially that no change had occurred.

In fact, they had completely undermined our National Government and trespassed against us to take over international land jurisdiction functions that were never delegated to them.

The original State of Florida was converted to the Florida State, a place-holder land trust, also under the de facto control of the British-backed Territorial Government. And they settled in to meddle with our affairs and feed off of us and rack up phony debts against us and our assets for the next 150 years. They have enslaved their own people since the reign of Queen Victoria via clever corporate enfranchisement schemes using semantic deceit to mischaracterize their own people as “citizens” and chattel properties standing good for the debts of the government.

The same fraud has been perpetuated throughout the former British Empire, and of course, surreptitiously imposed upon Americans. Britain has been operating “America” as a puppet master since 1868. It was and is the greatest threat to our national security and the peace of the world.

The British government and the affiliated British Crown Corporations, the Crown Temple Bar Association, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Scotland, deserve to be excoriated for their roles in causing commercial feudalism through British imperialism and legal control of all American institutions and systems of government.

The British government and its affiliates have merely pretended to be our friends and allies while pillaging and enslaving us to archaic legal and economic systems of control.  They owe us an incalculable debt and whether or not they ever pay it, that fact needs to be known, seen, and accepted for what it is.

And even far more than the money, manpower, and natural resources that have been poured down the British drain, another debt needs to be recognized — the debt owed to our loyalty, friendship, and sacrifice in the face of their Breach of Trust.

American Intelligence Media Gives Nunes Final Report A Reality Check
Sunday, April 29, 2018 10:31 AM

American Intelligence Media 

Listen: Betsy and Thomas Discuss This Post

This post is a response to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s – Report on Russian Active Measures, issued on March 22, 2018 (released to the public on April 27)  – the so called Nunes Final Report. The report may be confusing to some, so the Anonymous Patriots decided to elucidate and clarify the findings of the report. It is hard to tell what you are reading without accurate backstory.

First, we salute the congressional aides who worked tirelessly to read through the thousands of pages made available to the House Permanent Selection Committee on Intelligence. They have did a great job writing the Nunes Memo and this new report, Nunes Final Report, which is the completed product of their efforts. Other investigations of the committee continue to develop, but this final report is important to get out to the public before election season gets in to full gear.

Devin Nunes has been under fire from the Democrats and the main stream media over his committee’s investigative activities to follow through on his personal discovery that the Obama White House unmasked people in the Trump campaign during and after the election. This discovery and its release to the press caused the committee to question his ethics and even remove him as the chairman for a while.

Eventually, after significant revelations in the first Nunes Memo, Nunes resumed the leadership of the committee. When the impact of the Nunes Memo had settled on the American people, Adam Schiff attempted, but failed miserably, to write a counter response to the Nunes Memo. It was completely rejected due to having to be completely redacted. The Nunes Final Report is another exoneration of Trump in the “Trump/Russian Collusion” witch hunt.

Often, congressional investigations are election-year virtue-signaling that is staged to discredit the “other” side with some wrongdoings or to simply grandstand for political favor before the press. For example, Goodlatte’s committee called for an investigation of Christopher Steele, the foreign agent who worked with Russians to create the fake Russian Dossier. What was Jeff Session’s response? Crickets.

Or, what about the congressional demand for Department of Justice investigations into “leaks”? There are currently 27 investigations into leaks that have been handed over to Inspector General Michael Horowitz and only Andrew McCabe has been recommend for possible indictment. What was Jeff Session’s response? Crickets.

Or, what about the unmasking that Susan Rice was caught doing in the White House SCIF? What about the huge number of unmaskings that Samantha Power did when she worked at the United Nations under Obama? What was Jeff Session’s response? Crickets.

Congress demands the 55,000 Peter Strzok/Lisa Page text messages. First, they all “come up missing” and then they are found again but only 232 of them are released, and then only after they are scrubbed of all “personal references, SES members, attachments, and any texts that may not address governmental business.”  What was Jeff Sessions response? Appoint more people to help release documents for congressional oversight. Essentially: Crickets

Good ole “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” Mr. Magoo (Sessions) truly has NO plan, and obviously NO clue – or, he is as corrupt as Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey and the gang.

Devin Nunes’ Final Report exonerates Trump from any Russian collusion. Even Rod Rosenstein recently announced publicly that the Mueller investigation has found NO Trump/Russian collusion. Then why does Mueller continue his investigation seeing that the fake “criminal intent” or “crime” has not been found and no evidence or witness indicates any collusion, conspiracy, or corruption?

This is the same question you will arrive at after reading this Nunes Final Report. Why was there ever an investigation into Trump and Russia? Especially, after a very expensive report was already concluded in January of 2017 that exonerated Trump and his team from any wrong doing concerning Russia, the election, the DNC server, or any of the other “Comey Created Crimes” that were used to attempt to frame Trump with any kind of crime that could be manufactured.

The Intelligence Community Assessment: Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections, January 6, 2017 is the basis for much of the intelligence provided to the House Intelligence Committee and, therefore, had to be part of the final report, even though those highly partisan and political findings were controversial and clearly not substantiated with evidence of any kind. You will find those lies woven throughout this report because the report is quoting the prior “fake” investigation which had no evidence to make incorrect judgments about the “election meddling.”

This is obvious because the evidence that has come out since this report abnegates most of the findings of the January 2017 Intelligence Community’s report. This is very confusing and is one of the reason we would like to go over each of the Nunes Final Report findings to clarify and elucidate what the reality truly is.

Reality Checks of the Findings

Finding #1: The Kremlin exploits free or independent media spaces and open democracies to conduct active measures in Europe.

Reality: The U. S. Department of Defense does the same thing throughout the entire world through the direction of the Board of Broadcasting Governors.

Finding #2: Russia supports fringe political parties and non-governmental organizations in Europe to further the Kremlin’s agenda while also disparaging or discrediting politicians and groups seen as hostile to Moscow.

Reality: The CIA conducted active measures against Putin in the recent presidential elections in Russia as reported by many news agencies and many Russian Orthodox clergy. US sanctions imposed by Obama against Russia were intended to harm Putin during the election.

Finding #3: Russia conducts increasingly aggressive cyber operations against European governments; a tactic that will continue to present a profound threat.

Reality: These were based upon the false reports in France and throughout Europe.

Finding #4: Russia targets disaffected European populations and exploits social, political, and racial divisions in an effort to sow discord, encourage unrest, and incite protests.

Reality: Europe is being invaded by radical Islamic terrorists and Russia has nothing to do with the unrest.

Finding #5: Russia leverages business and economic ties in Europe to achieve the Kremlin’s goals, message displeasure, or inflict punishment.

Reality: These false allegations were used during recent elections in numerous European countries to bolster support for far-left candidates.

Finding #6: European governments and media outlets are conducting a variety of activities to combat Russian influence campaigns.

Reality: Freedom of speech is being killed in Europe even faster than in America.

Finding #7: Russia conducted cyber-attacks on U.S. political institutions in 2015-2016.

Reality: There are constant cyber-attacks from Russia, China, Pakistan, Iran, and many other countries. It is next to impossible to know who the attack was from due to the ability to leave the “footprints” of anyone you want. The Vault 7 Wikileaks demonstrated that fact.

Finding #8: Russian-state actors and third-party intermediaries were responsible for the dissemination of documents and communications stolen from U.S. political organizations.

Reality: This is nonsense, Dmitri Alperovitch left Russian footprints of the DNC server and there was no “hacking” of the DNC by Russia, it was a breach from the inside of the DNC as evidenced by Podesta’s emails stating this fact. Comey tried to blame it on Alexey Gubarev, Guccifer 2.0, Kim.com, and numerous others without any evidence whatsoever.

Finding #9: The Russian government used RT to advance its malign influence campaign during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Reality: The January 2017 U. S. Intelligence Community report harped on old intelligence reports on election influence that was dressed up in new clothes that attributed the news agency Russia Today (RT) with having a great influence on the U. S. presidential election. This is nonsense. Few people watch RT and it had little effect upon the American electorate even though the expensive intelligence report had lots of color charts and diagrams alleging RT got Trump elected and Hillary hated.

Finding #10: Russian intelligence leveraged social media in an attempt to sow social discord and to undermine the U.S. electoral process.

Reality: The pathetic attempt of Mueller to take a New York Times article that was three years old and concoct a story about the Putin sponsored Internet Research Agency that trolled and rigged the U. S. presidential election was completely incorrect. Also, there was no evidence presented in Mueller’s indictment of these 13 Russians who he cannot prosecute. They allegedly spent $100,000 on Facebook ads to win the election for Trump. The allegedly “powerful ads” that spread this discord during the election are laughable and were ran primarily after the election was over and could have had zero effect on the election.

Finding #11: The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s notification to numerous Russian hacking victims was largely inadequate.

Reality: This must be a lie because the extensive prior investigation of January 2017 found no such “hacking victims.” Mueller imaginative Russian trolls supposedly had contact with Americans but no one was informed. That’s because Mueller’s lies don’t hold water.

Finding #12: Communication between the Department of Homeland Security and state election officials was impeded by state officials’ mistrust of federal government overreach coupled with a unprecedented level of Russian cyber intrusions.

Reality: There was little or no Russian cyber intrusion; this has been proven and publicly stated repeatedly by multiple U. S. federal agencies. The lies about Russians hacking voting poles is nonsense according to Homeland Security who was ultimately responsible for the election. Even Obama, Mueller, Comey, Clapper and others all say that Russian’s did not “change a single vote.”

Finding #13: The joint Office of the Director of National Intelligence and Department of Homeland Security public statement attributing election interference to Russia was ineffective.

Reality: That is because there were multiple reports that did not agree with one another.

Finding #14: The Executive Branch’s post-election response was insufficient.

Reality: Obama said the Russian’s meddled, then he said they did not meddle – which story do you want to believe? Obama meddled in the election a great deal through Google, Facebook, and the U. S. Digital Service.

Finding #15: The majority of the Intelligence Community Assessment judgments on Russia’s election activities employed proper analytic tradecraft.

Reality: If you look at the ICA report, the evidence and analysis is weak at best and simply covered up the Hillary/Podesta crimes during the election while pointing at RT – a news agency no one knows exists. The Democratic primary rigging, campaign finance fraud, and paying for the Russian Dossier are all swept under the rug by the corrupt Department of Justice (Magoo-land), FBI, CIA, and the rest of the “17 Intelligence Agencies” that were part of the deceit.

Finding #16: The Intelligence Community Assessment judgments on Putin’s strategic intentions did not employ proper analytic tradecraft.

Reality: The report failed miserably, I we said above.

Finding #17: The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an enterprise counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign after receiving information related to Trump.

Reality: This is when John Brennan lied about the George Papadopoulos counter-intelligence investigation and pushed the “framing” up to the FBI counter-intelligence department under Bill Preistap, Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe and the Comey gang.

Finding #18: As part of the enterprise counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an individual counterintelligence investigation into Carter Page.

Reality: This is the fake FISA 702 (Title 1) warrant gained with the fake Russian Dossier signed off by the following people who lied and committed multiple felonies: Comey, Rosenstein, Boente, McCabe, Yates, and perhaps others.

Finding #19: The dossier compiled by Christopher Steele formed an essential part of an application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain electronic surveillance on Carter Page.

Reality: This Dossier was added to by Russians, Brits, FBI, DNC, CIA, NSA, and was completely fake and was used to frame Trump the candidate and impeach Trump the president. Most of the people named in the Dossier are currently suing Christopher Steele. Using foreign agents to meddle in an election is a felony.

Finding #20: Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted Paul Manafort on several charges, none of which relate to allegations of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Reality: Manafort was under four investigations by the FBI, CIA, Treasury Department and the ODNI before he ever joined the Trump Team and it was the obligation of those agencies to inform Trump which they did not do for a considerable amount of time. When Trump was informed about Manafort being investigated, he fired him. Same with General Michael Flynn.

Finding #22: General Flynn pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding his December 2016 conversations with Ambassador Kislyak, even though the Federal Bureau of Investigation agents did not detect any deception during Flynn’s interview.

Reality: This is the standard trick of a Grand Jury. Record someone who is not aware of the recording and then use it to trick them into a false statement. Standard operating procedure for criminal lawyers.

Finding #23: Executive Branch officials did not notify the Trump campaign that members of the campaign were assessed to be potential counterintelligence concerns.

Reality: This is true about Carter Page, George P., Michael Cohen, Manafort and others. No agency informed him that he was being illegally surveilled or falsely investigated by the FBI Counterintelligence Department, NSA, CIA, and the other 17 intelligence agencies.

Finding #24: The February 2018 indictment of the Internet Research Agency and Russian nationals exposes Russian actors and their intent to spread distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general.

Reality: Mueller’s indictments were completely fake and shows the desperation of Mueller to find anything Russian – especially since he will never have to convict them.

Finding #25: When asked directly, none of the interviewed witnesses provided evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Reality: Trump is again exonerated of any Russian collusion. Duh…

Finding #26: The Committee found no evidence that President Trump’s pre-campaign business dealings formed the basis for collusion during the campaign.

Reality: The FBI had already done a thorough background check on any Trump connections to Russian and found none.

Finding #27: The Republican national security establishment’s opposition to candidate Trump created opportunities for two less-experienced individuals with pro-Russia views to serve as campaign advisors: George Papadopoulos and Carter Page.

Reality: George and Carter actually never served the Trump Team at all. Carter Page had a restraining order put on him to keep him away from the Trump Team. George was completely incidental and never spoke with Trump.

Finding #28: The change in the Republican Party platform regarding Ukraine resulted in a stronger position against Russia, not a weaker one, and there is no evidence that Paul Manafort was involved.

Reality: The Paul Manafort accusations concerning Ukraine are all false and have been demonstrated to be opposition propaganda created by Alexandra Chalupa, a member of the Democratic National Committee. Trump has been much harder on Putin than Obama or Hillary ever were.

Finding #29: There is no evidence that Trump associates were involved in the theft or publication of Clinton campaign-related emails, although Trump associates had numerous ill-advised contacts with Wikileaks.

Reality: Trump had nothing to do with the DNC server and the lies created around it that were meant to be the cover story for Hillary’s Uranium One pay-off deals that were found to be her weakest point in the election. Thus, the Trump/Russian story was born in the DNC as a distraction from Hillary’s crimes that might lose her the election. Hillary accused Trump of her crimes.

Finding #30: Carter Page did not travel to Moscow in July 2016 on behalf of the Trump campaign, but the Committee is concerned about his seemingly incomplete accounts of his activity in Moscow.

Reality: Carter Page was a FBI asset of Mueller and Comey (well-known from court proceedings) and was sent to Russia to strengthen Comey’s Russian Dossier story. Page was supposed to be the go-between for billions in Russian funds coming to Trump.

Finding #31: George Papadopoulos’ attempts to leverage his Russian contacts to facilitate meetings between the Trump campaign and Russians was unsuccessful.

Reality: George had no Russian connections, just the lies of Hillary’s good friend Alexander Downer. George’s investigation started in July of 2016, but George was not picked up for questioning until July of 2017. He was surveilled the entire time and so was the Trump Team under false pretenses.

Finding #32: Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort attended a June 9, 2016, meeting at Trump Tower where they expected to receive-but did not ultimately obtain-derogatory information on candidate Clinton from Russian sources.

Reality: This meeting with a known spy was arranged by the State Department that granted a special visa for this Russian agent to enter the country. Manafort was already being surveilled and Felix Sater was the Russian who arranged the entire meeting. Sater is another Comey FBI asset who helped arrange many of Comey’s attempts at framing Trump.

Finding #33: Donald Trump Jr. briefly met with a Russian government official at the 2016 National Rifle Association annual meeting, but the Committee found no evidence that the two discussed the U.S. presidential election.

Reality: Nothing burger. Sad attempts at smearing.

Finding #34: The Committee found no evidence that meetings between Trump associates-including Jeff Sessions-and official representatives of the Russian government including Ambassador Kislyak-reflected collusion, coordination, or conspiracy with the Russian government.

Reality: Session never needed to recuse himself from the Russian nonsense and he knew it. Sessions is “in on” the Uranium One deal though, and this is his “Russian Collusion.”

Finding #35: Possible Russian efforts to set up a back channel with Trump associates after the election suggest the absence of collusion during the campaign, since the communication associated with collusion would have rendered such a “back channel” unnecessary.

Reality: This was one of the saddest attempts at “creating a Trump crime.”

Finding #36: Prior to conducting opposition research targeting candidate Trump’s business dealings, Fusion GPS conducted research benefitting Russian interests.

Reality: When we see Fusion GPS’s records, we will see the list of criminals behind many of the biggest crimes in Washington D. C. and the world. Fusion propagandizes for criminals; that’s their job.

Finding #37; The law firm Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to research candidate Trump’s Russia ties.

Reality: Finally, a Federal Elections Commission investigation into these gross crimes has begun. This is typical for a Clinton – hide behind a lawyer and attorney/client privilege – which doesn’t seem to exist for Trump and Cohen. This is clearly election meddling with a foreign country’s intervention.

Finding #38: Christopher Steele claims to have obtained his dossier information second and third-hand from purported high-placed Russian sources, such as government officials with links to the Kremlin and intelligence services.

Reality: If this is true, Russians, through Christopher Steele and the Democratic National Committee (Hillary and Podesta) interfered in the U. S. presidential election. This is a crime.

Finding #39; Christopher Steele’s information from Russian sources was provided directly to Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie and indirectly to the Clinton campaign.

Reality: The opposition research was also provided to the main stream media and spread throughout the world as if it were truth – instead of politically created lies.

Finding #40: Leaks of classified information regarding Russian intentions to sow discord in the U.S. presidential election began prior to the election day-November 8, 2016.

Reality: Where is Michael Horowitz who is investigating these leaks? Exactly who are these leakers? We know who they are but they haven’t been indicted yet.

Finding #41: Leaks of classified information alleging Russian intentions to help elect candidate Trump increased dramatically after the election day- November 8, 2016.

Reality: The election meddling and attempted framing of Trump with a “November Surprise” (Dossier, Trump Tower server, etc.) by the FBI and DoJ then turned into an attempt to impeach a sitting president.

Finding #42: The leaks prior to the classified Intelligence Community Assessment’s publication, particularly leaks occurring after the U.S. presidential election, correlate to specific language found in the Intelligence Community Assessment.

Reality: Yes, it was intelligence community members who continued to leak after the election in an attempt to discredit and impeach Trump. Clapper the “Lying Machine”, Corrupt Comey and his friend Daniel Richman (NYT institutionalized leaker-Special Government Employee-with a clearance), John Brennan, Sally Yates, Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, etc.

Finding #43: Continued leaks of classified information have damaged national security and potentially endangered lives.

Reality: Has anyone seen Jeff Sessions, Michael Horowitz and his new SES buddy John Huber, or anyone in the DoJ or FBI? Perhaps they are just busy stopping those leakers.

Finding #44: Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN national security analyst, provided inconsistent testimony to the Committee about his contacts with the media, including CNN.

Reality: Clapper is a notorious liar who will go down in the annals of time as the biggest liar in the U. S. Intelligence Community’s history. Every word that Clapper says in public about his interactions with President Trump is a separate crime. Is anyone counting?

Conclusion

We hope that our scathing review and translation of the Nunes Final Report document is helpful in decoding the doublespeak of politicians. In general, the report is great news because it again backs up the fact that the witch hunt was concocted as a continuation of “Comey and the Gang’s” intent on stopping Donald Trump from becoming president, and later attempting to impeach or depose him through a coup d’etat — a good old-fashioned CIA/Soros color revolution that hopes to keep globalists, like Hillary, in key political positions that can continue the overthrow of the U. S. Constitution by transnational corporations who are intent on the complete raping and fleecing the American Republic.

ROBERT MUELLER: The Unstoppable Deep State Bully
Thursday, April 26, 2018 4:33 PM

.

by Congressman Louie Gohmert 

Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that isa stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone.
I do not make these statements lightly. 
.
Each time I prepared to question Mueller during Congressional hearings, the more concerned I became about his work ethic. Then as I went back to begin compiling all that information in order to recount personal interactions with Mueller, the more clearly the big picture began to come into focus. At one point I had to make the decision to stop adding to this or it would turn into a far too lengthy project. 
 .
My goal was to share some first-hand information as other Republican Members of Congress had requested, adding, “You seem to know so much about him.”
This article is prepared from my viewpoint to help better inform the reader about the Special Prosecutor leading the effort to railroad President Donald J. Trump through whatever manufactured charge he can allege. Judging by Mueller’s history, it doesn’t matter who he has to threaten, harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get someone to be willing to allege something – anything – about our current President, it certainly appears Mueller will do what it takes to bring down his target, ethically, or unethically, based on my findings.
 .
What does former Attorney General Eric Holder say? Sounds like much the same thing I just said. Holder: “I’ve known Bob Mueller for 20, 30 years; my guess is he’s just tryingto make the case as good as he possibly can.” Holder does know him. He has seen Mueller at work when Holder was obstructing justice and acting in contempt of Congress. He knows Mueller’s FBI framed innocent people and had no remorse in doing so. Let’s look at what we know.
.
What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Mueller’s disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully-elected President. 
.
Any Republican who says anything resembling, “Bob Mueller will do a good job as Special Counsel,” “Bob Mueller has a great reputation for being fair,” or anything similar; (A) wants President Trump indicted for something and removed from office regardless of his innocence; (B) is intentionally ignorant of the myriad of outrageous problems permeating Mueller’s professional history; or (C) is cultivating future Democrat votes when he or she comes before the Senate someday for a confirmation hearing.
.
There is simply too much clear and convincing information available to the contrary. Where other writers have set out information succinctly, I have quoted them, with proper attribution. My goal is to help you see what I have found.
.
.
In his early years as FBI Director, most Republican members of Congress gave Mueller pass in oversight hearings, allowing him to avoid tough questions. After all, we were continually told, “Bush appointed him.” I gave him easy questions the first time I questioned him in 2005 out of deference to his Vietnam service. Yet, the longer I was in Congress, the more conspicuous the problems became.
.
As I have said before of another Vietnam veteran, just because someone deserves our respect for service or our sympathy for things that happened to them in the military, that does not give them the right to harm our country later. As glaring problems came to light, I toughened up my questions in the oversight hearings. But first, let’s cover a little of Mueller’s history.
.

MUELLER’S MINIONS HELP MOBSTER WHITEY BULGER ELIMINATE MOB COMPETITORS

.
The Boston Globe noted Robert Mueller’s connection with the Whitey Bulger case in an article entitled, “One Lingering Question for FBI Director Robert Mueller.”
The Globe said this:
“[Mike] Albano [former Parole Board Member who was threatened by two F.B.I. agents for considering parole for the men imprisoned for a crime they did not commit] was appalled that, later that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as an assistant US attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies. Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset…” Source
Mueller was the head of the Criminal Division as Assistant U.S. Attorney, then as Acting U.S. Attorney. I could not find any explanation online by Mueller as to why he insisted on keeping the defendants in prison that FBI agents — in the pocket of Whitey Bulger had framed for a murder they did not commit. Make no mistake: these were not honorable people he had incarcerated.
.
But it was part of a pattern that eventually became quite clear that Mueller was more concerned with convicting and putting people in jail he disliked, even if they were innocent of the charges, than he was with ferreting out the truth.
I found no explanation as to why he did not bear any responsibility for the $100 million paid to the defendants who were framed by FBI agents under his control. The Boston Globe said, “Thanks to the FBI’s corruption, taxpayers got stuck with the $100 million bill for compensating the framed men, two of whom, Greco and Tameleo, died in prison.” Source
.

The New York Times explained the relationship  this way: “In the 1980’s, while [FBI Agent] Mr. Connolly was working with Whitey Bulger, Mr. Mueller was assistant United States attorney in Boston in charge of the criminal division and for a period was the acting United States attorney here, presiding over Mr. Connolly and Mr. Bulger as a ’topechelon informant.’ Officials of the Massachusetts state police and the Boston Police Department had long wondered why their investigations of Mr. Bulger were always compromised before they could gather evidence against him, and they suspected that the FBI was protecting him.” Source

.
If Mr. Mueller had no knowledge that the FBI agents he used were engaged in criminal activity, then he certainly was so incredibly blind that he should never be allowed back into any type of criminal case supervision. He certainly helped continue to contribute to the damages of the framed individuals by working so hard to prevent them from being paroled out of prison even as their charges were on their way to being completely thrown out.
.
Notice also evidence of a pattern throughout this article: the leaking of information to disparage Mueller’s targets. In the Whitey Bulger case, the leaks were to organized crime, the Mob.
.
One of the basic tenets of our Democratic Republic is that we never imprison people for being bad” people. Anyone imprisoned has to have committed a specific crime for which they are found guilty. Not in Mueller’s world. He has the reverse list of Santa Claus; and, if you are on his list, you get punished even if you are framed. He never apologizes when the truth is learned, no matter how wrong or potentially criminal or malicious the prosecution was. In his book, you deserve what you get even if you did not commit the crime for which he helped put you away.
.
This is one example, but as Al Pacino once famously said, “I’m just getting warmed up!”
.

CONGRESSMAN CURT WELDON DEFEATED BY MUELLER’S FBI

During my first term in Congress, 2005-2006, Congressman Curt Weldon delivered some powerful and relentless allegations about the FBI having prior knowledge that 9-11 was coming. He alleged loudly and vociferously that there was documentary evidence to show that 9-11 could have been prevented and thousands of lives saved if the FBI had done their job. My recollection is that he may have even accused them of intentionally turning their heads. He held up documents at times while making these claims in speeches on the floor of the House of Representatives.
.
I was surprised that FBI Director Mueller seemed to take those allegations without the major response that appeared to be appropriate, at least to me. It seemed he should either admit the FBI made significant mistakes or refute the allegations. Little did I know Mueller’s FBI was preparing a response, but it certainly was not the kind of response that I would have expected if an honorable man had been running that once hallowed institution.
.
Congressman Curt Weldon
You can read two of Congressman Weldon’s speeches on the House floor that are linked below. After reading the excerpts I have provided, you may get a window into the mind of the FBI Director or someone under Mueller’s control at the FBI. The FBI literally destroyed Congressman Weldon’s public service life which foreclosed his ability to use a national platform to expose what he believed were major problems in the FBI fostered under the Clinton administration.
.
Here is but one such excerpt of a speech wherein he spoke of the failure of the FBI leadership, then under the direction of the Clinton administration as it ultimately came within Mueller’s control right before 9-11. They failed to even accept from the military any information on the very terrorists who would later go on to commit the atrocities of  9-11, much less act upon it. They gleaned this information through development of a surveillance technology in a project called Able Danger.
 .
Rep. Curt Weldon
House Floor Speech, October 19, 2005 [EXCERPT]
Mr. Speaker, back in 1999 when I was Chair of the Defense Research Subcommittee, the Army was doing cutting-edge work on a new type of technology to allow us to understand and predict emerging transnational terrorist threats. That technology was being done at several locations but was being led by our Special Forces Command. The work that they were doing was unprecedented. And because of what I saw there, I supported the development of a national capability of a collaborative center that the CIA would just not accept.
In fact, in November 4 of 1999, two years before 9-11, in a meeting in my office with the Deputy Secretary of Defense, Deputy Director of the CIA, Deputy Director of the FBI, we presented a nine-page proposal to create a national collaborative center. When we finished the brief, the CIA said we did not need that capability, and so before 9-11 we did not have it.
 .
When President Bush came in after a year of research, he announced the formation of the Terrorism Threat Integration Center, exactly what I had proposed in 1999. Today it is known as the NCTC, the National Counterterrorism Center. But, Mr. Speaker, what troubles me is not the fact that we did not take those steps.
 .
What troubles me is that I now have learned in the last four months that one of the tasks that was being done in 1999 and 2000 was a top-secret program organized at the request of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, carried out by the general in charge of our Special Forces Command, a very elite unit focusing on information regarding al Qaeda.
 .
It was a military language effort to allow us to identify the key cells of al Qaeda around the world and to give the military the capability to plan actions against those cells, so they could not attack us as they didin 1993 at the Trade Center, at the Khobar Towers, the U.S.S. Cole attack, and the African embassy bombings.
.
What I did not know, Mr. Speaker, up until June of this year, was that that secret program called Able Danger actually identified the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda in January and February of 2000, over one year before 9-11 ever happened. In addition, I learned that not only did we identify the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda, but we identified Mohamed Atta as one of the members of that Brooklyn cell along with three other terrorists who were the leadership of the 9-11 attack.
.
I have also learned, Mr. Speaker, that in September of 2000, again, over one year before 9-11, that Able Danger team attempted on three separate occasions to provide information to the FBI about the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda, and on three separate occasions they were denied by lawyers in the previous administration to transfer that information. 
.
Mr. Speaker, this past Sunday on “Meet the Press,” Louis Freeh, FBI Director at the time, was interviewed by Tim Russert. The first question to Louis Freeh was in regard to the FBI’s ability to ferret out the terrorists. Louis Freeh’s response, which can be obtained by anyone in this country as a part of the official record, was, ‘Well, Tim, we are now finding out that a top-secret program of the military called Able Danger actually identified the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda and Mohammed Atta over a year before 9-11.’
.
And what Louis Freeh said, Mr. Speaker, is that that kind of actionable data could have allowed us to prevent the hijackings that occurred on September 11.
.
So now we know, Mr. Speaker, that military intelligence officers working in a program authorized by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the general in charge of Special Forces Command, identified Mohammed Atta and three terrorists a year before 9-11, tried to transfer that information to the FBI were denied; and the FBI Director has now said publicly if he would have had that information, the FBI could have used it to perhaps prevent the hijackings that struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the plane that landed in Pennsylvania and perhaps saved 3,000 lives and changed the course of world history. (Emphasis added) Source
.
.
Curt Weldon gave speech after speech, recounting what he saw and what he knew, recounting the FBI and the Clinton administration failures in information sharing that led to 9-11. Source
.
Congressman Weldon tried to hold those accountable in the FBI and CIA that he felt mishandled actionable intelligence which he said could have thwarted the 9-11 terrorists if only top officials at the FBI and others had allowed our rank-and-file law enforcement and military to engage in such a battle. He recounted many examples of how they failed to do so.
.
Understand, I am not a 9-11 denier, nor a big conspiracy advocate. I am simply relaying things for which Congressman Weldon lambasted people at the top of the FBI and other places. Source
 .
In 2006, the Robert Mueller-led FBI took horrendously unjust actions to derail Curt Weldon’s re-election bid just weeks before the vote —nactions that were later described as a “hit job” in this WND article:
 .
“Each of Weldon’s 10 previous re-elections had been by sizable margins. Polls showed he was up by 5-7 points [in the fall of 2006]. Three weeks prior to the election, however, a national story ran about Weldon based upon anonymous sources that an investigation was underway against him and his daughter, alleging illegal activities involving his congressional work.
.
Weldon had received no prior notification of any such investigation and was dumbfounded that such a story would run especially since he regularly briefed the FBI and intelligence agencies on his work.
.
A week after the news story broke, alleging a need to act quickly because of the leak, FBI agents from Washington raided the home of Weldon’s daughter at 7 a.m. on a Monday morning… Local TV and print media had all been alerted to the raid in advance and were already in position to cover the story. Within hours, Democratic protesters were waving “Caught RedHanded” signs outside Weldon’s district office in Upper Darby.
 .
In the ensuing two weeks, local and national media ran multiple stories implying that Weldon too must have been under investigation. Given the coverage, Weldon lost the election…
 .
To this day, incredibly, no one in authority has talked to Weldon or his daughter about the raid or the investigation. There was no follow up, no questions, no grand jury interrogation, nothing.
.
One year after the raid the local FBI office called Weldon’s daughter to have her come get the property that had been removed from her home. That was it…The raid ruined the career of Weldon and his daughter.” (Emphasis added) Source
Though the WND article blamed the Clintons and Sandy Berger for orchestrating the FBI “hit job,” we can’t lose sight of the fact that the head of the FBI at the time was Robert Mueller. Please understand what former FBI officials have told me: the FBI would NEVER go after a member of Congress, House or Senate, without the full disclosure to and blessing of the FBI Director. Even if the idea on how to silence Curt Weldon did not come from Director Mueller himself, it surely had his blessing and encouragement, though and, at best, his silence and inaction.
.
The early morning raid by Mueller’s FBI with all the media outside, obviously alerted by the FBI, had achieved its goal of colluding to abuse the federal justice system to silence Curt Weldon by ending his political career. Mueller’s FBI worked it like a charm.

If the Clintons and Berger manipulated Weldon’s reelection to assure his defeat, they did it with the artful aid of Mueller, all while George W. Bush was President. Is any of this sounding familiar?

People say those kinds of things just don’t happen in America. They certainly seemed to when Mueller was in charge of the FBI and they certainly seem to while he is Special Counsel, as well.
 .
It appears clear that President Obama and his myrmidons knew of Mueller’s reputation, that he could be used to take out their political opponents should such extra-legal actions become politically necessary. To the great dismay of the many good, decent and straight arrow FBI agents, Obama begged Mueller to stay on for two more years than the 10 years the law allowed. Obama then asked Congress to approve Mueller’s waiver allowing him to stay on two extra years.
Perhaps the leaders in Congress did not realize what they were doing in approving it. I did. It was a major mistake, and I said so at the time. This is also why I objected strenuously the moment I heard Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed his old friend Bob Mueller to be Special Counsel to go after President Trump.
.
Rod Rosenstein
I was one of the few who were NOT surprised when Mueller started selecting his assistants in the Special Counsel’s office who had reputations for being bullies, for indicting people who were not guilty of the charges, for forcing people toward bankruptcy by running up their attorney’s fees (while the bullies in the Special Counsel’s office enjoy an apparently endless government budget), or by threatening innocent family members with prosecution so the Special Counsel’s victim would agree to pleading guilty to anything to prevent the Kafka-esque prosecutors from doing more harm to their families. The pattern is there. Are you seeing it?

MUELLER’S ILLEGAL RAID ON CONGRESSIONAL OFFICES

There is a doctrine in our experiment in self-government mandating that all parts of the government must have oversight to prevent power from corrupting and absolute power from corrupting absolutely. The Congress and Senate are accountable to the voters as is the President. All the massive bloated bureaucracy is supposed to be accountable to the Congress.
.

A good example would be complaints against the Department of Justice or, specifically, the FBI. If constituents or whistleblowers within those entities have complaints, a Congressman’s office is a good place to contact. Our conversations or information from constituents or whistleblowers are normally privileged from review by anyone within the Executive Branch. It must be so. If the FBI could raid our offices anytime an FBI agent were to complain to us, no FBI agent could ever afford to come forward, no matter how egregious the conduct they are wanting to disclose. Whistle blowing FBI Agents have to know they are protected. They always have known that in the past.

As I learned from talking with attorneys who had helped the House previously with this issue, if the FBI or another law enforcement entity needed to search something on the House side of the Capitol or House office buildings, they contacted the House Counsel, whether with a warrant or request. The House Counsel with approval of the Speaker, would go through the Congress Members documents, computers, flash drives, or anything that might have any bearing on what was being sought as part of the investigation. They would honestly determine what was relevant and what was not, and what was both irrelevant and privileged from Executive Branch review.
.
Normally, if there were a dispute or question, it could be presented to a federal judge for a private in-chamber review to determine if it were privileged or relevant. If the DOJ or FBI were to get a warrant and gather all computers or documents in a Congressman’s office without the recovered items being screened to insure they are not privileged from DOJ seizure, the DOJ would be risking that an entire case might be thrown out because of things improperly recovered and “fruit of the poisonous tree,” preventing the use of even things that were not privileged.
.
However, FBI Director Mueller seemed determined to throw over 200 years of Constitutional restraints to the wind so he could let Congress know he was the unstoppable government bully who could potentially waltz into our offices whenever he wished. In the case of Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat of Louisiana, Mueller was willing to risk a reversal of a slam dunk criminal case just to send a message to the rest of Congress: you don’t mess with the Zohan, if the Zohan is Bob Mueller.
 .
That Congressman Jefferson was guilty of something did not surprise most observers when, amidst swirling allegations, $90,000 in cold hard cash was found in his freezer. As we understood it, the FBI had a witness who was wired and basically got Jefferson on tape taking money. They had mountains of indisputable evidence to prove their case. They had gotten an entirely appropriate warrant to search his home and had even more mountains of evidence to nail the lid on his coffin, figuratively speaking.
.
The FBI certainly did not need to conduct an unsupervised search of a Congressman’s office to put their unbeatable case at risk. Apparently, the risk was worth it to Mueller so he could show the Members of Congress who could harass or destroy them whenever he wished. Apparently, the FBI knew just the right federal judge who would disregard the Constitution and allow Mueller’s minions to do their dirty work. Source
.

I read the Application for Warrant and the accompanying Affidavit for Warrant to raid Jefferson’s office, as I did so many times as a felony judge. I could not believe they would risk such a high-profile case just to try to intimidate Members of Congress. In the opinion of this former prosecutor, felony judge and Appellate Court Chief Justice, they could have gotten a conviction based on what they had already spelled out in the very lengthy affidavit.

.
The official attorneys representing the House, knowing my background, allowed me to sit in on the extremely heated discussions between attorneys for the House, DOJ attorneys, and, to my recollection, an attorney from the Bush White House, after Jefferson’s office was raided. The FBI had gathered up virtually every kind of record, computerized or otherwise, and carted them off.
.
I was not aware of the times that the DOJ and House attorneys, with the Speaker’s permission, had cooperated over the years. No Congressman is above the law nor is any above having search warrants issued against them which is why Jefferson’s home was searched without protest. However, when the material is in a Congressional office, there is a critical and centuries’ old balance of power that must be preserved.
 .
The Mueller FBI spokespeople along with the DOJ choir assured everyone that everything was fine. They were going to have some of the DOJ’s attorneys review all the material and give back anything that was privileged and unlawful for the DOJ to see. Then they would make sure none of the DOJ attorneys who participated in the review  of materials (that were privileged from the DOJ’s viewing) would be allowed to be prosecutors in Jefferson’s case.
.
If you find that kind of thinking terribly flawed and constitutionally appalling, you would be in agreement with the former Speakers of the House, the Vice President at the time, and ultimately, the final decisions of our federal appellate court system. They found the search to be illegal and inappropriate. Fortunately for the DOJ, they did not throw the entire case out.
In retrospect, we did not know at the time what a farce a DOJ “firewall” would have been. Now we do!

Mueller’s Five Year Up-Or-Out Policy

In federal law enforcement, it takes a new federal agent or supervisor about five years or so after arriving at a newly assigned office to gain the trust and respect of local law officers. That trust and respect is absolutely critical to doing the best job possible. Yet new FBI Director Robert Mueller came up with a new personnel policy that would rid the FBI of thousands of years of its most invaluable experience.
.
In a nutshell, after an FBI employee was in any type of supervisory position for five years, he or she had to either come to Washington to sit at a desk or get out of the FBI. In the myriad of FBI offices around the country, most agents love what they do in actively enforcing the law. They have families involved in the community; their kids enjoy their schools; and they do not want to move to the high cost of living in Washington, DC, and especially not to an inside desk job.
What occurred around the country was that agents in charge of their local offices got out of the FBI and did something more lucrative. Though they really wanted to stay in, they were not allowed to do so if they were not moving to DC. Agents told me that it was not unusual for the Special Agent in Charge of a field office to have well over 20 years of experience before the policy change. Under Mueller’s policy that changed to new Special Agents in Charge having five to ten years of experience when they took over.
If the FBI Director wanted nothing but “yes” men and women around the country working for him, this was a great policy. Newer agents are more likely to unquestioningly salute the FBI Mecca in Washington, and the Director, and never boldly offer a suggestion to fix a bad idea and Mueller had plenty of them. Whether it was wasting millions of dollars on a software boondoggle or questionable personnel preferences, agents tell me Mueller did not want to hear from more experienced people voicing their concerns about his ideas or policies.
.
An NPR report December 13, 2007, entitled, FBI’S ‘Five-And-Out’ Transfer Policy Draws Criticism dealt with the Mueller controversial policy:
.
From the beginning of this year (2007) until the end of September (2007), 576 agents found themselves in the five-and-out pool. Less than half of them  just 286  opted to go to headquarters; 150 decided to take a pay cut and a lesser job to stay put; 135 retired; and five resigned outright.”
.
In the period of nine months accounted for in this report, the FBI ran off a massive amount of absolutely priceless law enforcement experience vested in 140 invaluable agents. For the vast part, those are the agents who have seen the mistakes, learned lessons, could advise newer agents on unseen pitfalls of investigations and pursuit of justice. So many of these had at least 20-30 years of experience or more. The lessons learned by such seasoned agents were lost as the agents carried it with them when they left.
In the 2007 NPR report, the FBI Agents Association indicated that the Five-Year-Up-or-Out program hobbles field offices and takes relationships forged there for granted. In other words, it was a terrible idea.
The incalculable experience loss damages the FBI by eliminating those in the field in a position to write to or meet with the FBI Director to advise him against some of the mounting judgment errors on his part which were listed in the NPR article. But this was not the only damage done. If an FBI Director has inappropriate personal vengeance in mind or holds an inappropriate prejudice such as those that infamously motivated Director J. Edgar Hoover, then the older, wiser, experienced agents were not around with the confidence to question or guide the Director away from potential misjudgment.
.
I also cannot help but wonder if Mueller had not run off the more experienced agents, would they have been able to advise against and stop the kind of abuses and corruption being unearthed right now that occurred during the Obama administration.
Rather than admit that his Five Year Up or Out Policy was a mistake, Mueller eventually changed the policy to a Seven Year Up or Out Program.
I once pointed out to him at a hearing that if he had applied the Five Year Up-or-Out Policy to literally everyone in a supervisory position, he himself would have had to leave the FBI by September of 2006. He did not seem to be amused.

One other problem remained that will be discussed in more detail later in this article. Before Mueller became Director, FBI agents were trained to identify certain Muslims who had radicalized and become dangerous. Mueller purged and even eliminated training that would have helped identify radical Islamic killers. By running off the more experienced agents who had better training on radical Islam before Mueller, “blinded us of the ability to identify our enemy,” as I was told by some of them, Mueller put victims in harm’s way in cities like Boston, San Diego and elsewhere.

.

NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER ABUSES

National Security Letters (NSL) are a tool that allows the DOJ to bypass the formality of subpoenas, applications for warrants with affidavits in support, and instead simply send a letter to an individual, business or any entity they so choose to demand that records or documents of any kind must be produced and provided to the sender. The letter also informs the recipient that if the recipient reveals to anyone that the letter was received or what it requires to be produced, then the recipient has committed a federal felony and will be prosecuted. It is a rather dramatic event to receive such a letter and realize that this simple letter could have such profound power and consequences.

The Committee in the House of Representatives that has oversight jurisdiction over the DOJ is the Judiciary Committee of which I am a member. We have grilled DOJ personnel in the past over the potential for NSL abuse, but both the House and Senate Committees were reassured that there were no known abuses of this extra-constitutional power.
Unfortunately, the day came when we learned that there had been an extraordinary number of abuses. Apparently, some of Mueller’s FBI agents had just been sending out demands for records or documents without any probable cause as the Fourth Amendment requires. Some agents were on outright fishing expeditions just to find out what different people were doing. We were told that there may have even been thousands of NSL’s sent out to get documents without following either the Constitutional requirements or the DOJ’s own policy requirements.
When the Inspector General’s report revealed such absolutely outrageous conduct by FBI agents, some of us in Congress were absolutely livid.
An NBC News report on March 9, 2007, had this headline and sub-headline: “Justice Department: FBI acted illegally on data; Audit finds agency misused Patriot Act to obtain information on citizens.” Source
.
The report went on to say, “FBI Director Robert Mueller said he was to blame for not  putting more safeguards into place. ‘I am to be held accountable,’ Mueller said. He told reporters he would correct the problems and did not plan to resign. ‘The inspector general went and did the audit that I should have put in place many years ago,’ Mueller said.”
Some of us Republicans wanted to completely eliminate such an extraordinary power that was so widely abused. Nonetheless, I could not help but wonder that if Mueller had not run off thousands of years of experience though his “Five Year Up -or-Out Policy,” perhaps young, inexperienced agents would not have been so tempted to vastly abuse the power of the NSL. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales lost his job over the widespread, pervasive abuses under Mueller’s supervision. In retrospect, Mueller probably should have been gone first. It was his people, his lack of oversight, his atmosphere that encouraged it, and his FBI that did virtually nothing to hold people accountable.
.
Senator Ted Stevens
With Mueller as his mentor and confidant, is it any surprise that we’re now finding James Comey’s FBI found additional ways to monitor Americans and plot with Democrat loyalists in an attempt to oust a duly-elected President?

THE WITCH HUNT AGAINST REPUBLICAN SENATOR TED STEVENS AND HIS TRAGIC DEATH

Ted Stevens had served in the U.S. Senate since 1968 and was indicted in 2008 by the U.S. Justice Department. One would think before the U.S. government would seek to destroy a sitting U.S. Senator, there would be no question whatsoever of his guilt. One would be completely wrong in thinking so when the FBI Director is Robert Mueller.
Roll Call provides us with General Colin Powell’s take on Ted Stevens:
“According to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who had worked closely with the senator since his days as President Ronald Reagan’s national security adviser, the senator was ‘a trusted individual … someone whose word you could rely on. I never heard in all of those years a single dissenting voice with respect to his integrity, with respect to his forthrightness, and with respect to the fact that when you shook hands with Ted Stevens, or made a deal with Ted Stevens, it was going to be a deal that benefited the nation in the long run, one that he would stick with.’” Source
Such a glowing reputation certainly did not inhibit Mueller’s FBI from putting Stevens in its cross-hairs, pushing to get an indictment that came 100 days before his election, and engaging in third world dictator-type tactics to help an innocent man lose his election, after which he lost his life.
As reported by NPR, after the conviction and all truth came rolling out of the framing and conviction of Senator Stevens, the new Attorney General Eric Holder, had no choice. He “abandoned the Stevens case in April 2009 after uncovering new and ‘disturbing’ details about the prosecution…” Source
Unfortunately for Ted Stevens, his conviction came only eight days before his election, which tipped the scales on a close election.
Does this sound familiar yet? The allegation was that Senator Stevens had not paid full price for improvements to his Alaska cabin. As Roll Callreported, he had actually overpaid for the improvements by over twenty percent.
Roll Call went on to state:
.
“But relying on false records and fueled by testimony from a richly rewarded ‘cooperating’ witness… government prosecutors convinced jurors to find him guilty just eight days before the general election which he lost by less than 2 percent of the vote.” Source

.

After a report substantiated massive improprieties by the FBI and DOJ in the investigation and prosecution of Senator Stevens, the result was ultimately a complete dismissal of the conviction.
At the time there was no direct evidence that Director Mueller was aware of the tactics of concealing exculpatory evidence that would have exonerated Stevens, and the creation of evidence that convicted him in 2008. Nearly four years later, in 2012, the Alaska Dispatch News concluded:
.
“Bottom line: Kepner (the lead FBI investigator accused of wrongdoing by Agent Joy) is still working for the FBI and is still investigating cases, including criminal probes. Joy, the whistleblower (who was the FBI agent who disclosed the FBI’s vast wrongdoing, especially of Kepner), has left the agency.” Source

.

Director Mueller either did control or could have controlled what happened to the lead FBI agent that destroyed a well-respected U.S. Senator. That U.S. Senator was not only completely innocent of the manufactured case against him, he was an honest and honorable man. Under Director Mueller’s overriding supervision, the wrongdoer who helped manufacture the case stayed on and the whistleblower was punished. Obviously, the FBI Director wanted his FBI agents to understand that honesty would be punished if it revealed wrongdoing within Mueller’s organization.
Further, not only was evidentiary proof of Senator Stevens’ innocence concealed from the Senator’s defense attorneys by the FBI, there was also a witness that provided  compelling testimony that Stevens’ had done everything appropriately. That witness,  however, was who agents sent back to Alaska by FBI Agents, unbeknownst to the Senator’s defense attorneys.
This key exonerating testimony was placed out of reach for Senator Stevens’ defense. Someone should have gone to jail for this illegality within the nation’s top law enforcement agency. Instead, Senator Stevens lost his seat, and surprise, surprise,  Mueller’s FBI helped another elected Republican bite the dust. Unfortunately, I am not speaking figuratively.
.
In August of 2010, former Senator Stevens boarded his doomed plane. But for the heinous, twisted and corrupt investigation by the FBI, and inappropriate prosecution by the DOJ, he would have still been a sitting U.S. Senator. Don’t forget, one vote in the Senate was critical to ObamaCare becoming law also. If Senator Stevens was still there, it would not have become law.
In the following month after Senator Stevens’ untimely death, in September of 2010, a young DOJ lawyer, Nicholas Marsh who had been involved in the Stevens case, committed suicide at his home as the investigation into the fraudulently created case continued. The report expressed, “no conclusion as to his (Marsh’s) conduct,” given his untimely death. Robert Luskin, an attorney for Marsh, said, “he tried to do the right thing.” Source
If you wonder what happened to the valuable FBI agent who was an upstanding whistleblower with a conscience, you should know that in Mueller’s FBI, Special Agent Joy was terribly mistreated. Orders came down from on high that he was not to  participate in any criminal investigation again, which is the FBI management’s way of  forcing an agent out of the FBI. On the other hand, the FBI agent who was said to have manufactured evidence against Senator Stevens while hiding evidence of his innocence was treated wonderfully and continued to work important criminal cases for Director Mueller.
.
If you wonder if mistreatment of an FBI agent who exposed impropriety was an anomaly in Mueller’s FBI, the Alaska Dispatch noted this about another case:
“Former FBI agent Jane Turner was treated much like Joy (the whistleblower agent in the Stevens case) after she blew the whistle on fellow agents who had taken valuable mementos from Ground Zero following the 9-11 terrorist attacks. She took the FBI to court over her treatment and ended up winning her case against the agency after a jury trial. When you blow the whistle on the FBI, ‘it’s death by a million paper cuts,’ she told Alaska Dispatch. Turner said that agents who violate the FBI’s omerta — those who internally challenge the agency — are undercut and isolated.  ‘They (Mueller’s FBI supervisors) do everything they can to get you to quit’ she said.” Source

DEATH OF DR. STEVEN HATFILL’S REPUTATION AND PRODUCTIVE LIFE

Here is how Mollie Hemingway of The Federalistdescribed this combination Mueller/Comey debacle:
“The FBI absolutely bungled its investigation into the Anthrax attacker who struck after the 9-11 terrorist attacks. Carl Cannon goes through this story well, and it’s worth reading for how it involves both Comey and his dear ‘friend’ and current special counsel Robert Mueller. The FBI tried  in the media  its case against Hatfill. Their actual case ended up being thrown out by the courts:
.
Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled. They botched the investigation of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that took five lives and infected 17 other people, shut down the U.S. Capitol and Washington’s mail system, solidified the Bush administration’s antipathy for Iraq, and eventually, when the facts finally came out, made the FBI look feckless, incompetent, and easily manipulated by outside political pressure.
More from the Carl Cannon cited above, recounting how disastrous the attempt to convict Dr. Steven Hatfill for a crime he didn’t commit was:
In truth, Hatfill was an implausible suspect from the outset. He was a virologist who never handled anthrax, which is a bacterium. (Ivins, by contrast, shared ownership of anthrax patents, was diagnosed as having paranoid personality disorder, and had a habit of stalking and threatening people with anonymous letters  – including the woman who provided the long-ignored tip to the FBI). So what evidence did the FBI have against Hatfill? There was none, so the agency did a Hail Mary, importing two bloodhounds from California whose handlers claimed could sniff the scent of the killer on the anthrax-tainted letters. These dogs were shown to Hatfill, who promptly petted them. When the dogs responded favorably, their handlers told the FBI that they’d “alerted” on Hatfill and that he must be the killer. Source
.
Unfortunately, both Mueller and Comey were absolutely and totally convinced of the innocent man’s guilt. They ruined his life, his relationship with friends, neighbors and potential employers. And from Carl Cannon, Real Clear Politics:
.
You’d think that any good FBI agent would have kicked these quacks in the fanny and found their dogs a good home. Or at least checked news accounts of criminal cases in California where these same dogs had been used against defendants who’d been convicted — and later exonerated. As Pulitzer Prize-winning Los Angeles Times investigative reporter David Willman detailed in his authoritative book on the case, a California judge who’d tossed out a murder conviction based on these sketchy canines called the prosecution’s dog handler “as biased as any witness that this court has ever seen.”
.
Instead, Mueller, who micromanaged the anthrax case and fell in love with the dubious dog evidence, and personally assured Ashcroft and presumably George W. Bush that in Steven Hatfill, the bureau had its man…
Mueller didn’t exactly distinguish himself with contrition, either. In 2008, after Ivins committed suicide as he was about to be apprehended for his crimes, and the Justice Department had formally exonerated Hatfill –and paid him $5.82 million in a legal settlement ($2.82+150,000/yr. for 20 yrs)  –Mueller could not be bothered to walk across the street to attend the press conference announcing the case’s resolution. When reporters did ask him about it, Mueller was graceless. “I do not apologize for any aspect of the investigation,” he said, adding that it would be erroneous “to say there were mistakes.” Source
Though FBI jurisdiction has its limitations, Mueller’s ego does not.
.
Mueller and Comey’s next target in the Anthrax case was Dr. Bruce Ivins. As the FBI was closing in and preparing to give him the ultimate Hatfill treatment, Dr. Ivins took his own life. Though Mueller and Comey were every bit as convinced that Dr. Ivins was the Anthrax culprit as they were that Dr. Hatfill was, there are lingering questions about whether or not there was a case beyond a reasonable doubt. Since Dr. Ivins is deceased and had some mental issues, we are expected to simply accept that he was definitely the Anthrax killer and drop the whole matter.
.
That’s a difficult ask after taxpayer money paid off Mueller’s previous victim. Mueller had relentlessly dogged Dr. Hatfill using life-destroying, Orwellian tactics. Either Mueller was wrong when he said it would be a mistake, “to say there were mistakes,” in the railroading of Hatfill or Mueller did intentionally and knowingly persecute an innocent man.

THE FRAMING OF SCOOTER LIBBY

In 2003, during yet another fabricated and politically-charged FBI investigation, this one “searching” for the leak of CIA agent Valery Plame’s identity to the media. Robert Mueller’s very dear close friend James Comey was at the time serving as the Deputy Attorney General. Comey convinced then Attorney General John Ashcroft that he should recuse himself from the Plame investigation. At the time, Ashcroft was in the hospital.

.
Scooter Libby
After Deputy A.G. Comey was successful in securing Ashcroft’s recusal, Comey then got to choose the Special Counsel. He then looked about for someone who was completely independent of any relationships that might affect his independence and settled upon his own child’s godfather and named Patrick Fitzgerald to investigate the source of the leak. So much for the independence of the Special Counsel.
.
The entire episode was further revealed as a fraud when it was later made public that Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald, FBI Director Mueller, and Deputy Attorney Comey had very early on learned that the source of Plame’s identity leak came from Richard Armitage. But neither Comey nor Mueller nor Fitzgerald wanted Armitage’s scalp. Oh no. These so-called apolitical, fair-minded pursuers of their own brand of justice were after a bigger name in the Bush administration like Vice President Dick Cheney or Karl Rove. Yet they knew from the beginning that these two men were not guilty of anything.
Nonetheless, Fitzgerald, Mueller and Comey pursued Cheney’s chief of staff, Scooter  Libby, as a path to ensnare the Vice President. According to multiple reports, Fitzgerald  had twice offered to drop all charges against Libby if he would ‘deliver’ Cheney to him. There was nothing to deliver.
Is any of this sounding familiar? Could it be that these same tactics have been used against an innocent Gen. Mike Flynn? Could it be that Flynn only agreed to plead guilty to prevent any family members from being unjustly prosecuted and to also prevent going completely broke from attorneys’ fees? That’s the apparent Mueller -Comey-Special Counsel distinctive modus-operandi. Libby would not lie about Cheney, so he was prosecuted for obstruction of justice, perjury, making a false statement. This Spectatorreport in 2015 sums up this particularly egregious element of the railroading:
“… By the time Scooter Libby was tried in 2007 it wasn’t for anything
to do with the Plame leak  everyone then knew Armitage had taken responsibility for that but for lying to federal officials about what he had said to three reporters, including Miller.
.
It is relating to this part of the story that an extraordinary new piece of information has come to light. After her spell in prison, and with her job on the line, Miller was eventually worn down to agree to hand over some redacted portions of notes of her few conversations with Libby. Several years on, she could no longer recall where she  had first heard of Plame’s CIA identity, but her notes included a reference to Wilson alongside which the journalist had added in brackets ‘wife works in Bureau?’ After Fitzgerald went throughthese notes it was put to Miller that this showed that the CIA identity of Plame had been raised by Libby during the noted meeting. At Libby’s trial Miller was the only reporter to state that Libby had discussed Plame. His conviction and his sentencing to 30 months in prison and a $250,000 fine, rested on this piece of evidence.
.
But Miller has just published her memoirs. One detail in particular stands out. Since the Libby trial, Miller has read Plame’s own memoir and there discovered that Plame had worked at a State Department bureau as cover for her real CIA role. The discovery, in Miller’s words, ‘left her cold’. The idea that the ‘Bureau’ in her notebook meant ‘CIA’ had been planted in her head by Fitzgerald.
.
It was a strange word to use for the CIA. Reading Plame’s memoir, Miller realized that ‘Bureau’ was in brackets because it related to her working at State Department. (Emphasis added) Source
.
What that means is that Scooter Libby had not lied as she originally thought and testified. He was innocent of everything including the contrived offense. For his honesty and innocence, Scooter Libby spent time behind bars, and still has a federal felony conviction he carries like an albatross.
.
The real culprit of the allegation for which the Special Counsel was appointed, and massive amounts of tax payer dollars expended was Richard Armitage. A similar technique was used against Martha Stewart. After all, Mueller’s FBI developed both cases. If the desired crime to be prosecuted was never committed, then talk to someone you want to convict until you find something that others are willing to say was not true. Then you can convict them of lying to the FBI. Martha Stewart found out about Mueller’s FBI the hard way. Unfortunately, Mueller has left a wake of innocent people whom he has crowned with criminal records. 
.
History does seem to repeat itself when it is recording the same people using the same tactics. Can anyone who has ever actually looked at Robert Mueller’s history honestly say that Mueller deserves a sterling reputation in law enforcement? One part of his reputation he does apparently deserve is the reputation for being James Comey’s mentor.

MUELLER’S ‘COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP’ WITH DOJ ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATORS OF TERRORISM

In 2011, in one of the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight hearings, FBI Director Mueller repeatedly testified during questioning by various Members about how the Muslim community was just like every other religious community in the United States. He also referenced an “Outreach Program” the FBI had with the Muslim community.
.
When it was my turn to question, I could not help but put the two points of his testimony together for a purge question. See video here or embedded above.
.
GOHMERT: Thank you, Director. I see you had mentioned earlier, and
it’s in your written statement, that the FBI’s developed extensive outreach to Muslim communities and in answer to an earlier question I understood you to say that you know Muslim communities were like all other communities, so I’m curious as the result of the extensive outreach program the FBI’s had to the Muslim community, how is your outreach program going with the Baptists and the Catholics?
MUELLER: I’m not certain of, necessarily the rest of that, the question I would say — there are outreach to all segments of a particular city or county or society is good.
GOHMERT: Well do you have a particular program of outreach to Hindus, Buddhists, Jewish community, agnostics or is it just an extensive outreach program to  –
MUELLER: We have outreach to every one of those communities.
GOHMERT: And how do you do that?
MUELLER: Every one of those communities can be affected can be affected by
facts or circumstance
GOHMERT: I’ve looked extensively, and I haven’t seen anywhere in any one from the FBI’s letters, information that there’s been an extensive outreach program to any other community trying to develop trust in this kind of relationship and it makes me wonder if there is an issue of trust or some problem like that that the FBI has seen in that particular community.
MUELLER: I would say if you look at one of our more effective tools or what we call citizens academies where we bring in individuals from a variety of segments of the territory in which the office operates . . . look at the citizens’ academy, the persons here, they are a crosssection of the community, they can be Muslim, could be Indian, they can be Baptists  –
GOHMERT: Okay but no specific programs to any of those. You have extensive outreach to Muslim community and then you have a program of outreach to communities in general is what it sounds like. 
.
Congressman Louie Gohmert
We went further in the questioning. The 2007 trial of the Holy Land Foundation, the largest terrorism financing trial in American history, linked the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) to the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas. CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case. Because of this affiliation, the FBI  issued policy and guidance to restrict its non-investigative interactions with CAIR in an effort to limit CAIR’s ability to exploit contacts with the FBI. As a result, FBI field offices were instructed to cut ties with all local branches of CAIR across the country.
.
GOHMERT: Are you aware of the evidence in the Holy Land Foundation case that linked the Council on American-Islamic relations, CAIR, the Islamic Society of North America and the North America Islamic Trust to the Holy Land Foundation?
MUELLER: I’m not going to speak to specific information in a particular case. I would tell you on the other hand that we do not  –
GOHMERT: Are you aware of the case, Director?
[CROSSTALK]
MUELLER:  – relationship with CAIR because of concerns  –
GOHMERT: Well I’ve got the letter from the Assistant Director Richard Powers that says in light of the evidence  – talking about during the trial evidence was introduced that demonstrated a relationship among CAIR, individual CAIR founders, including its current president emeritus and executive director and the Palestine committee, evidence was also introduced that demonstrated a relationship between the Palestine committee and Hamas, which was designated as a terrorist organization in 1995. In light of that evidence, he says, the FBI suspended all formal contacts between CAIR and FBI. Well now it’s my understanding, and I’ve got documentation, and I hope you’ve seen this kind of documentation before, it’s public record, and also the memo order from the judge in turning down a request that the unindicted co-conspirators be eliminated from the list, and he says the FBI’s information is clear there is a tie here, and I’m not going to grant the deletion of these particular parties as unindicted co-conspirators.
.
So, I’m a little surprised that you’re reluctant to discuss something that’s already been set out in an order, that’s already been in a letter saying we cut ties in light of the evidence at this trial. I’m  just surprised it took the evidence that the FBI had, being introduced at the trial in order to sever the relationships with CAIR that it (the FBI) had that showed going back to the 1993 meeting in Philadelphia, what was tied to a terrorist organization. So, I welcome your comments about that.
MUELLER: As I told you before, we have no formal relationship with CAIR because of concerns with regard to the national leadership on that. 
.
What Director Mueller was intentionally deceptive about was that the FBI had apparently maintained a relationship and even “community partnership” instigated on his watch with CAIR and other groups and individuals that his FBI had evidence showing they were co-conspirators to terrorism. That, of course, is consistent with his misrepresentation that Mueller’s FBI had outreach programs to other religiouscommunities just like they did with the Muslim community. They did not. He was not honest about it.
.
In a March 2009 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) questionedMueller over the FBI move to cut off contact with CAIR. Mueller responded to Kyl’s pressing over how the policy was to be handled by FBI field offices and headquarters with the following:
MUELLER: We try to adapt, when we have situations where we have an issue with one or more individuals, as opposed to institution, or an institution, large, to identify the specificity of those particular individuals or issues that need to be addressed.
.
We will generally have — individuals may have some maybe leaders in the community who we have no reason to believe whatsoever are involved in terrorism, but may be affiliated, in some way, shape or form, with an institution about which there is some concern, and which we have to work out a separate arrangement.
.
We have to be sensitive to both the individuals, as well as the organization, and try to resolve the issues that may prevent us from working with a particular organization.
KYL: They try to “adapt” with members of terror-related groups? Are they as “sensitive” with other organizations? Do they work out “separate arrangements” with members of, say, the Mafia or the Ku Klux Klan for “community outreach”? Why the special treatment for radical Islamic terrorism?  SOURCE
.
A March 2012 review of FBI field office compliance with this policy by the Office of  Inspector General found a discrepancy between the FBI’s enforcement policy restricting  contact and interaction with CAIR and its resulting actions. Rather than FBI headquarters enforcing the rules, they hedged. Mueller set up a separate cover through the Office of Public Affairs and allowed them to work together, despite the terrorist connections.
.
That was the cultivated atmosphere of Mueller’s FBI.
 .
The DOJ actually set out in writing in an indictment that CAIR and some of the people Mueller was coddling were supporters of terrorism. I had understood that the plan by the Bush Justice Department was that if they got convictions of the principals in the Holy Land Foundation trial, they would come right back after the co-conspirators who were named in the indictment as co-conspirators but who were not formally indicted.
In late 2008, the DOJ got convictions against all those formally indicted, so DOJ could then move forward with formally indicting and convicting the restEXCEPT that the November 2008 election meant it was now going to be the OBAMA DOJ with Eric Holder leading. The newly-named but not confirmed Attorney General apparently made clear they were not going to pursue any of the named co-conspirators.
 .
That itself was a major loss for the United States in its war against terrorism in the Obama administration. It was a self-inflicted refusal to go after and defeat our enemies. All of the named co-conspirators would not likely have been formally indicted, but certainly there was evidence to support the allegations against some of them, as the federal district court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had formally found.
 .
One of the problems with FBI Director Mueller is that he had already been cozying up to named co-conspirators with evidence in hand of their collusion with terrorists. That probably was an assurance to President Obama and Attorney General Holder that Mueller would fit right in to the Obama administration. He did. It also helps explain why President Obama and AG Holder wanted him to serve and extra two years as FBI Director. Mueller was their kind of guy. Unfortunately for America, he truly was!

PURGING THE FBI TRAINING MATERIALS

We repeatedly see cases where people were radicalized, came on the FBI radar, but the federal agents were looking for Islamophobes, not the terrorists standing in front of them. That is because Mueller’s demand of his FBI Agents, in the New Age to which he brought them, was to look for Islamophobes.
 .
If a Mueller-trained FBI agent got a complaint about a potential radical Islamist who may pose a threat, the agent must immediately recognize that the one complaining is most likely an Islamophobe. That means the agent should first investigate whether the complainant is guilty of a hate crime.
.
Too often it was AFTER an attack occurred that Mueller-trained FBI agents would decide that there really was a radical Islamic threat to the United States. The blinding of our FBI agents to the domestic threat of radical Islam is part of the beguiling damage Robert Mueller did as FBI Director. That is also the kind of damage that got Americans killed, even though Mueller may have avoided offending the radical Islamists who were killing Americans.
.
As terrorism expert Patrick Poole continually points out in his “Known Wolf” series, the overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil are committed by those the FBI has interviewed and dismissed as a threat. Here are three of the more high-profile cases:
.
ORLANDO: The mass killer who attacked the Pulse nightclub in June 2016, Omar Mateen, had been interviewed by the FBI on THREE separate occasions.
 .
The open preliminary investigation in 2013 lasted 10 months, after Mateen had told others about mutual acquaintances he shared with the Boston bombers and had made extremist statements.
 .
He was investigated again in 2014 for his contacts with a suicide bomber who attended the same mosque. At one point, Mateen was placed on TWO separate terrorism databases. He was later removed from them.
 .
NORTHWEST AIRLINES: Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarded Detroit-bound Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day 2009 with 289 other passengers wearing an underwear bomb intended to murder them all.
 .
He was well-known to U.S. intelligence officials before he boarded.
 .
Only one month before the attempted bombing, Abdulmutallab’s father had actually gone to the U.S. embassy in Nigeria and met with two CIA officers.
 .
He directly told the CIA that he was concerned about his son’s extremism
 .
Abdulmutallab’s name was added to the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) database. However, his name was not added the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Database. Or even the no-fly list. So, he boarded a plane.
.
When asked about the near-takedown of the flight and these missteps, then-Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano remarkably told CNN that “the system worked.”
.
The only “system” that worked in this incident: a culture that values bravery, already instilled in the passengers who acted.
.
BOSTON: Prior to the bombing of the Boston Marathon by Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in April 2013 that killed three people and injured 264 others, the FBI had been tipped off.
 .
Twice.
.
Russian intelligence warned that Tamerlan was “a follower of radical Islam.” Initially, the FBI denied ever meeting with Tamerlan. They late claimed that they followed up on the lead, couldn’t find anything in their databases linking him to terrorism, and quickly closed the case.
.
After the second Russian warning, Tamerlan’s file was flagged by federal authorities demanding “mandatory” detention if he attempted to leave or re-enter the United States.
.
But Tsarnaev’s name was misspelled when it was entered into the database. An internal FBI report of the handling of the Tsarnaev’s case unsurprisingly — saw the FBI exonerate itself.  SOURCE
.
When I asked at yet another House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, Mueller himself admitted in response to my questioning, that the FBI had indeed gone to the Boston mosque the bombers attended. Of course, The FBI did not go to investigate the Tsarnaevs.
.
The bombers’ mosque, the Islamic Society of Boston, was incorporated by known and convicted terrorists. The incorporation papers were signed by none other than Abduram Al-Amoudi who is currently serving 23 years in a federal prison for funding terrorism. One of the members of the Board of Trustees included a leader of the International Muslim Brotherhood, Yusef al-Qawadari, who is barred from entering the United States due to his terrorist ties. 
 .
Did Mueller’s FBI go to the Boston bombers’ mosque to investigate the Tsarnaevs? This is from the House Judiciary oversight hearing transcript:
.
GOHMERT: The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks. If the Russians tell you that someone has been radicalized and you go check and see the mosque that they went to, then you get the articles of incorporation, as I have, for the group that created the Boston mosque where these Tsarnaevs attended, and you find out the name Al-Amoudi, which you will remember, because while you were FBI Director this man who was so helpful to the Clinton administration with so many big things, he gets arrested at Dulles Airport by the FBI and he is now doing over 20 years for supporting terrorism.
.
This is the guy that started the mosque where the Tsarnaevs were attending, and you didn’t even bother to go check about the mosque? And then when you have the pictures, why did no one go to the mosque and say, who are these guys? They may attend here. Why was that not done since such a thorough job was done?
 .
MUELLER: Your facts are not altogether
 .
GOHMERT: Point out specifically.
 .
MUELLER: May I finish my —
 .
GOHMERT: Point out specifically. Sir, if you’re going to call me a liar, you need to point out specifically where any facts are wrong.
 .
MUELLER: We went to the mosque prior to Boston.
 .
GOHMERT: Prior to Boston?
.
MUELLER: Prior to Boston happening, we were in that mosque talking to the imam several months beforehand as part of our outreach efforts. SOURCE
 .
Outreach efforts” ? Yes. That is apparently Mueller’s efforts to play figurative pattycake with the leaders and tell them how wonderful they are and how crazy all those Islamaphobes out there are, but they surely got assurance that Mueller’s FBI is after those bigots. Maybe they sat around on the floor and had a really nice meal together. One thing for certain, they weren’t asking about the Tsarnaevs! 
 .
But the hearing got even worse:
.
GOHMERT: Were you aware that those mosques were started by Al-Amoudi
MUELLER. I’ve answered the question, sir.
 .
GOHMERT. You didn’t answer the question. Were you aware that they were started by Al-Amoudi?
 .
MUELLER. No. . .
 .
Then my time for questioning expired, leaving many questions unanswered. Why was the FBI unaware of the origins of the mosque attended by the Boston bombers? This was arguably the most traumatic Islamic terrorist attack in America since 9-11 because the explosions happened on live television at the Boston Marathon. When did the FBI become an outreach-to-terrorism organization to the detriment and disregard of its investigations? Under Director Robert Mueller’s tenure, that’s when!
 .
In Director Mueller’s efforts to appease and please the named co-conspirators of terrorism, he was keenly attuned to their complaints that the FBI training materials on radical Islam said some things about Islamic terrorists that offended some Muslims. Never mind that the main offense was done to the American people by radical Islamists who wanted to kill Americans and destroy our way of life. Mueller wanted to make these co-conspirators feel good toward Mueller and to let them know he was pleased to appease. 
.
Director Mueller had all of the training materials regarding radical Islam “purged” of anything that might offend radical Islamic terrorists. So, in addition to using his “Five Year Up-or-Out” policy to force out so many experienced FBI agents who had been properly trained to identify radical Islamic terrorists, now Mueller was going even further. He was ensuring that new FBI agents would not know what to look for when assessing potentially radicalized individuals. 
 .
When some of us in Congress learned of the Mueller-mandated “purge” of FBI training materials, we demanded to see what was being removed. Unfortunately, Mueller was well experienced in covering his tracks, so naturally the pages of training materials that were purged were ordered to be “classified,” so most people would never get to see them.
 .
After many terrorist attacks, we would hear that the FBI had the Islamic terrorists on their radar but failed to identify them. Now you are beginning to see why FBI agents could not spot them. They were looking more at the complainant than they were at the radical Islamist because that is what Mueller had them trained to do.
.
Michele Bachmann and I were extremely upset that Americans were being killed because of the terribly flawed training. We demanded to see the material that wasb“purged” from the training of FBI agents regarding radical Islam. That is when we weretold it could not be sent over for review because the purged material was “classified.”
 .
We were authorized to review classified material, so we demanded to see it anyway. We were willing to go over to the FBI office or the DOJ, but we wanted to review the material. We were told they would bring it over and let us review it in the Rayburn Building in a protected setting. They finally agreed to produce the material.
 .
Members of Congress Michele Bachmann, Lynn Westmoreland, and I went to the little room to review the vast amount of material. Lynn was not able to stay as long as Michele and I did, but we started pouring through the notebooks of materials.
 .
It was classified so naturally I am not allowed to disclose any specifics, but we were surprised at the amount of material that was purged from training our agents. Some of the items that were strictly for illustration or accentuation were removed. A few were silly. But some should clearly have been left in if an FBI agent was going to know how and what a radical Islamic terrorist thinks, and what milestone had been reached in the radicalization process.
.

It was clear to Michele and me as we went through the purged materials that some of the material really did need to be taught to our FBI agents. For those densely-headed or radical activists who will wrongly proclaim that what I am writing is an Islamophobic complaint, please note that I have never said that all Muslims are terrorists. I have never said that, because all Muslims are NOT terrorists. But for the minority who are, we have to actually learn exactly what they study and learn how they think.

 .
As Patton made clear after defeating Rommel’s tanks in World War II, he studied his enemy, what he believed and how he thought. In the movie, “Patton,” he loudly proclaims, “Rommel, you magnificent ___, I read your book!” That is how an enemy is defeated. You study what they believe, how they think, what they know. Failure to do so is precisely why so many “Known Wolves” are able to attack us. Clearly, Mueller weakened our ability to recognize a true radical Islamic terrorist. As one of my friends in our U.S. Intelligence said, “We have blinded ourselves of the ability to see our enemy!
.
You cannot defeat an enemy you cannot define.” Robert Mueller deserves a significant amount of the credit for the inability of our federal agents to define our enemy.
.

PURGING THE ADVANCED COUNTER-TERRORISM AGENTS’ TRAINING MATERIALS

FBI Special Agent Kim Jensen had spent a great deal of his adult life studying radical Islam. He is personally responsible for some extraordinary undercover work that remains classified to this day. He was tasked with putting together a program to train our more experienced FBI agents to locate and identify radicalized Muslims on the threshold of violence. Jensen had done this well before Mueller began to cozy up with and pander to groups such as CAIR.
Complaints by similar groups caused Mueller to once again demand that our agents could not be properly instructed on radical Islam. Accordingly, Jensen’s approximately 700-pages of advanced training material on radical Islam were eliminated from FBI training and all copies were ordered destroyed. When Director Mueller decides he wants our federal agents to be blind and ignorant of radical Islam, they are indeed going to be blind and ignorant.
Fortunately, in changing times well after Mueller’s departure as FBI Director, a new request went out to Mr. Jensen to recreate that work because at least someone in the FBI needed to know what traits to look for in a terrorist. It still did not undo the years of damage from Mueller’s commanded ignorance of radical Islam.

MUELLER’S UNETHICAL ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

Robert Mueller had more than one direct conflict of interest that should have prohibited him from serving as the Special Counsel to investigate President Donald Trump. For one thing, President Trump fired his close friend and confidante, disgraced FBI Director James Comey. Mueller had long served as a mentor to Comey, who would most certainly be a critical witness in any investigation of Donald Trump.
.

Mueller and Comey had also been exceedingly close friends beyond the mentor relationship. But Comey’s insertion of himself into so much of the election cycle and even its aftermath in conversations he had with the President himself made him a critical witness in the investigation. There is no way Mueller could sit in judgment of his dear, close friend’s credibility, and certainly no way he should be allowed to do so.

Gregg Jarrett explained one aspect of this situation quite clearly and succinctly at FoxNews.comin an article titled, “Gregg Jarrett: Are Mueller and Comey ‘Colluding’
against Trump by acting as co-special counsel?” A portion of that article said the following:
The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits Mueller from serving if he has a “conflict of interest.” Even the appearance of a conflict is disallowed.
The same Code of Federal Regulations defines what constitutes a conflict.  That is, “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution” (28 CFR 45.2). Comey is that person. He was substantially involved in the conversation with President Trump who may be the subject of an obstruction investigation. In fact, the former Director is the only other person involved. There were no witnesses beyond himself.
.
A conflict of interest is a situation in which an individual has competing interests or loyalties. Here, it sets up a clash between the special counsel’s self -interest or bias and his professional or public interest in discharging his responsibilities in a fair, objective and impartial manner. His close association with the star witness raises the likelihood of prejudice or favoritism which is anathema to the fair administration of justice.
.
Mueller has no choice but to disqualify himself. The law affords him no discretion because the recusal is mandatory in its language. It does not say “may” or “can” or “might”. It says the special counsel “shall” recuse himself in such instances. An excellent post by Robert Barnes, a constitutional lawyer, identifies five statutes, regulations and codes of conduct that Mueller is violating because of his conflict of interest with Comey. Byron York, chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner recounts in detail the close personal relationship between Mueller and Comey which gives rise to the blatant conflict of interest. SOURCE
.
Another deeply troubling aspect of Mueller’s conflict of interest is and was his role in the investigation of Russia’s effort to illegally gain control of a substantial part of United States’ precious supply of uranium. That investigation was taking place within the Mueller FBI, which should have had a direct effect on prohibiting Secretary of State Clinton from participating in the approval of the uranium sale into the hands that were ultimately the Russian government.
.
Of course, then U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein had direct control over that Russia-uranium investigation in conjunction with FBI Director Mueller. It certainly appears that with what they had gleaned from that undercover investigation, they should never have been involved in any subsequent investigation that might touch on potential collusion and millions of dollars paid to the Clinton’s foundation by the very beneficiaries of the Russians’ uranium schemes. Rosenstein
and Mueller’s failure to warn against or stop the sale reeks of its own form of collusion, cooperation, or capitulation in what some consider a treasonous sale.
.
Quite the interesting little duo now in charge of all things investigatory surrounding their own actions. In fact, Rosenstein and Mueller are now in a position to dissuade others from pursuing THEM for their own conduct.

SPECIAL PROSECUTOR MUELLER HIRED EXTREMELY BIASED ATTORNEYS AND INVESTIGATORS WHO WORKED TO STOP TRUMP’S ELECTION

Through it all, Mueller’s modus operandi does not seem to have ever changed. He has hired nine Democrat-supporting lawyers and NO Republicans. Sure, all attorneys likely have political views and that is not a problem so long as they do not affect their job. But not a single Republican was worthy of Mueller’s selection? Were there no establishment Republicans who wanted to join him in railroading President Trump?
Mueller’s hand-picked team of Democrats reveal political views that distinctly conflict with Trump and the conservative agenda, raising questions about Mueller’s bias and his ability to conduct a fair investigation. At least nine members of Mueller’s team made significant contributions to Democrats or Democratic campaigns, while none contributed to Trump’s campaign and only James Quarles contributed to Republicans in a drastically smaller amount than what he gave to Democrats.
.
Analysis of Federal Election Commission records shows that Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, Andrew Goldstein, James Quarles, Elizabeth Prelogar, Greg Andres, Brandon Van Grack, Rush Atkinson, and Kyle Freeny all contributed over $50,000 in donations to Democrats including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s Presidential campaigns, various Democratic non-presidential candidates, and the Democratic National Convention.
.
Mueller also has surprisingly strong personal ties to a number of the lawyers he hired. Three former partners with Mueller at the Boston law firm of WilmerHale are on the payroll: Aaron Zebley, Jeannie Rhee, and James Quarles.
In addition to strong personal ties to Mueller, many of the attorneys have potential conflicts in working for persons directly connected to the people and issues being investigated. Jeannie Rhee represented Ben Rhodes, ex-Obama National Security Adviser, and the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering lawsuit, as well as Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit probing her private emails.
Aaron Zebley, former Chief of Staff to Mueller while Director of the FBI, represented Justin Cooper in the Clinton email scandal as he was responsible for setting up Clinton’s private email server. He admitted to physically damaging Clinton’s old mobile devices.

Andrew Goldstein joined the team after working under major Trump critic Preet Bharara in the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York. Bharara became a strong critic after Trump fired him as an Obama-holdover and spoke on ABC News that “there’s absolutely evidence to launch an obstruction of justice case against Trump’s team with regard to the Russia probe.” Does he sound a bit prejudiced?

Andrew Weissman, notoriously a “tough” prosecutor previously accused of “prosecutorial overreach,” has a less than stellar career after various courts reversed his prosecutions due to his questionable conduct and tactics. As director of the Enron Task Force, Weissman shattered the Arthur Andersen LLP accounting firm and destroyed over 85,000 jobs. In 2005, the conviction was reversed by the Supreme Court. In other words, the only true crime in the case was the murderous destruction of 85,000 jobs and the lives they ruined.
Weissman’s next conviction threw four Merrill Lynch executives into prison without bail for a year, only to be reversed by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. Weissman subsequently resigned from the Enron Task Force. A suspiciously timely move, as the public eye had just caught sight of his modus operandi.
Additionally, Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s electionnight celebration in New York City. He also sent an email to Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. President Trump was trying to enforce the law; Weisman was trying to enforce his bigotry against Trump and Republicans.
Peter Strzok was removed from Mueller’s team after more than 10,000 texts between him and former Mueller investigator Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti Trump tirades. They were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming President and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected.

GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN

Michael Flynn is a man who was caught up in manufactured controversy from the moment he stepped into his role in the Trump administration. The circumstances surrounding his take-down have become one of the more puzzling aspects of the Trump-Russia investigation.

His career took him from three decades in the U.S. Army to overseeing the Pentagon’s military intelligence operation and directing the Defense Intelligence Agency. Flynn was more than qualified to act as the first national security adviser in a new administration. However, his influence and zeal made him a clear target for the Trump-Russia investigation. 

As a strong supporter and friend of Donald Trump’s from the onset, he campaigned and publicly supported then-candidate Trump throughout 2016.
As best I can sort it out through the media hype and hysteria, having no first-hand knowledge like the rest of America: after the successful election, during the transition period, in December 2016, Flynn reportedly conversed with a Russian ambassador. He was “accidentally” swept up in an intelligence foreign surveillance recording. When this happens, the names of American citizens are supposed to be masked in the transcripts.
.
Somehow Flynn’s name was magically unmasked, which apparently allowed the Obama administration to peruse his meetings and conversations.
Parts of the classified transcript of that conversation were leaked to the media by rogue Deep State law breakers (criminals who Mueller seems completely disinterested in). This appears to be what fueled the media-driven narrative of Trump campaign “collusion” with Russia because Flynn had a discussion with a Russian ambassador, which conversation is absolutely legal and advisable. A media-generated doubt clouded Flynn’s reputation, as the discussion was longreported as having taken place during the campaign (which could possibly be illegal) but was later proven to have been after the election and during the transition which should not have been illegal.
After a complete pounding of media-driven hysteria, in mid-February of 2017, Flynn resigned having served only 23 days as National Security Advisor. Mueller targeted Flynn using illicitly-gathered and leaked foreign intelligence and surveillance as evidence.
.
Nine months later after Flynn and his family were subjected to Mueller’s usual threats and intimidation, a financially exhausted Flynn entered a guilty plea on one count of lying to the FBIthe result of a Mueller-technique perjury trap as was used on Scooter Libby and Martha Stewart.
.
What is Flynn guilty of? He apparently misremembered a conversation that took place 33 days previously? The FBI had a transcript of that conversation and already knew what information was there. They went into a conversation with Flynn not seeking answers to questions, but to try to trip him up on exact statements made in a conversation when they were already in possession of the transcript.
.
Flynn’s unmasking has become the center of a controversy wherein those transcripts were procured under exceedingly questionable circumstances before a judge who had a questionable and undisclosed relationship with part of Mueller’s team. That judge was appointed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), the secretive court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that allows federal law enforcement to seek secretive warrants to surveil foreign persons outside of the United States who are suspected of terrorism.
.

But the Obama administration and Mueller seemed to find it much more politically expedient to use the secret court to go after Americans who were part of the Trump team for actions that did not occur while they were part of the Trump campaign team. Strange goings-on..

One could argue that Judge Rudolph Contreras, the federal judge who accepted Flynn’s guilty plea, conveniently misremembered that he also served on the FISA court as a  judge and conveniently misremembered his friendship with the FBI agent whose interview was used as evidence against Flynn. As it turns out, the FBI interview notes of that very encounter with Flynn may exonerate Michael Flynn, crushing Mueller’s case against him, not to mention the highly questionable hearing before a judge who may well have been recused much too late to save the Flynn prosecution.

A FISA JUDGE TOO CLOSE TO THE GOVERNMENT AGENTS INVOLVED

The FISA-authorized FISC is built upon the principle that highly delicate cases dealing with government surveillance of foreign agents and officials would be handled in an unbiased and respectful environment where secrecy at all costs was critical. There is supposed to be an added precaution to prevent any potential for bias in a FISA Judge by having a rotation of judges.
.
That is why it is such a shock to find out now that Mueller’s case against Michael Flynn would happen to end up before the “randomly selected” very dear close personal friend of FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, who hated President Trump with a passion, as evidenced in his text messages with colleague and paramour, Lisa Page.
U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, or “Rudy” as Strzok likes to refer to him, should have recused himself from such a highly sensitive case involving the ultimate attempted removal of the duly-elected President of the United States who happened to be despised by the very people who by law were required to prosecute with fairness. He was later forced to ‘recuse’ himself and be removed from the Flynn proceedings, without public explanation.
.
This forced recusal was an unmistakable indication that he never should have been involved in the Michael Flynn plea agreement. Judge Contreras’ conflict of interest has yet to be explained by the court.
Contreras’ is one of only three local FISA court judges, and by default, is likely one of the judges who have on four occasions approved the Title I surveillance of another character in this melodrama, Carter Page. This is the case where the FBI is known to have intentionally misled the FISA court by using as evidence the illustrious “Steele Dossier,” a sordid opposition research document paid for by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Oh, what a tangled web of crime Special Prosecutor Mueller’s team appears to have helped weave, and of which Mueller appears to be completely disinterested, all while he searches high and low for an elusive crime to pin on the President.

MUELLER IGNORES APPARENTLY PROVABLE CRIMES INVOLVING THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN, THE FBI, THE FISA COURT, THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES

Strategically timed leaks of selective classified information are being used to target individuals for investigation in order to create the appearance of some sinister crime having been committed. Upon closer scrutiny, the cases fall apart. Yet, slam dunk federal criminal cases of leaking classified material are going on under Mueller’s nose, and by those within his purview and his team. When we think of all the leaks from Mueller’s investigation, it brings to mind Wilford Brimley’s quote from Absence of Malice: “You call what’s goin’ on around here a leak? Boy, the last time there was a leak like this, Noah built hisself a boat.”
Case in point: Eric Prince.
As Lee Smith put it in a recent article fromTabletMag.com, Robert Mueller’s Beltway
Cover-Up:
 .
News that special counselor Robert Mueller has turned his attention to Erik Prince’s January 11, 2017 meeting in the Seychelles with a Russian banker, a Lebanese-American political fixer, and officials from the United Arab Emirates, helps clarify the nature of Mueller’s work. It’s not an investigation that the former director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is leading—rather, it’s a cover-
up…
Mueller is said to believe that the Prince meeting was to set up a back channel with the Kremlin. But that makes no sense. According to the foundational text of the collusion narrative, the dossier allegedly written by former British spy Christopher Steele, the Kremlin had cultivated Trump himself for years. So what’s the purpose of a back channel, when Vladimir Putin already had a key to the front door of Mar-a-Lago?
Further, the collusion thesis holds that the Trump circle teamed with high-level Russian officials for the purpose of winning the 2016 election. How does a meeting that Erik Prince had a week before Trump’s inauguration advance the crooked election victory plot? It doesn’t—it contradicts it.
.
The writer goes on to point out that serious crimes have been committed that Mueller is purposefully ignoring.
 .
Prince was thrown into the middle of Russiagate after an April 3, 2017, Washington Post storyreported his meeting with the Russian banker. But how did anyone know about the meeting?
 .
After the story came out, Prince said he was shown “specific evidence” by sources from the intelligence community that the information was swept up in the collection of electronic communications and his identity was unmasked. The US official or officials who gave his name to the Postbroke the law when they leaked classified intelligence. “Unless the Washington Post has somehow miraculously recruited the bartender of a hotel in the Seychelles,” Prince told the House Intelligence Committee in December, “the only way that’s happening is through SIGINT [signals intelligence].”
.
Prince’s name was unmasked and leaked from classified signals intelligence. Oddly enough, it’s the same modus operandi used in the targeting of President Donald Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.
 .
It is a federal felony to publish leaked classified information. Ask WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about that particular unequal application of the law.
 .
The Deep State felons who are strategically leaking this information have politically weaponized our justice system and should be brought up on charges of high treason for their attempts, with malice of forethought, to manufacture the overthrow of a duly-elected President of the United States.
 .

The leaks and publication of classified information alone warrant investigation and prosecution to the fullest extent of the law in this matter, yet Mueller is uninterested in those crimes even as they go to the very heart of the credibility of the supposed  justification of his investigative mandate.

Yet, as I’ve demonstrated here, the man put in charge of the investigation of this Russia “collusion” case, Robert Mueller, has perfected the art of abuse of the justice system for personal and political gain. He is uninterested in any criminal activity that does not further his cause of damaging this President. If you think that is harsh, consider the criminality of the FISA court abuses by the Obama Department of Justice and FBI.
We have all heard ad nauseum about the infamous “Steele Dossier,” the opposition research document paid for by the Clinton campaign that was used to manufacture the Russia collusion narrative and spark what became the Mueller investigation into our President.
On June 18, 2017, Muller protégé and disgraced former FBI Director James Comey testified in front of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence about the Clinton campaign-funded document, telling Congress that the document was,
“salacious and unverified.”
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, created a court called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to allow secret warrants to surveil agents of foreign governments, be they U.S. citizens or non-U.S. actors. In October of 2016, the Obama DOJ/FBI successfully applied for one of these secret warrants to surveil Carter Page, a short-time Trump campaign volunteer.
 .
Since these warrants against U.S. citizens are outside of the bounds of the Constitution, they have to be renewed by applying to the court every 90 days after the first warrant application is approved. These secret warrants are so serious they have to be signed off on at the highest levels.
.
The applications in question would have been signed off on by Obama administration FBI and DOJ officials including then FBI Director James Comey. At least one of the renewal applications would have been signed off on by our current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. At the time of signing, they all would have had the knowledge and/or the professional and legal duty to know that the dossier was used as evidence and also had the legal duty to know the evidence origins.
The same would apply to the knowledge of the penalty for submitting unverified information to the FISC for the purpose of obtaining a warrant.
It is a crime to submit under the color of law an application to the FISC that contains unverified information. 50 U.S. Code § 1809
Comey’s “salacious and unverified” testimony before the Senate occurred eight months after the Clinton campaign-funded dossier was used in the first successful FISA court application to obtain a surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a Trump campaign volunteer for several months. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence examined the documentation submitted to the court and concluded that the unverified information contained in the Steele dossier was in fact used in the FISC application, without disclosing to the court that it was an opposition research document paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee:
.
Neither the initial application in October of 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.
The timing of the applications, the inclusion of material the DOJ/FBI knew to be unverified at the time, and the successful result after this fraudulent inclusion speak to the level of criminal corruption of those who sought to destroy Donald Trump’s candidacy and still seek to destroy his subsequent Presidency when their initial efforts failed. The widespread abuse of the FISA-authorized court, FISC, was laid bare in a court memorandum of review of these abuses that was declassified in 2017 that went virtually unnoticed by the media because it didn’t fit their narrative.
.
These are serious crimes that, left unchecked, lead nations down the path to tyranny at the hands of people who think they know better than we do what is best for us. It’s an age-old struggle America’s Founding Fathers knew well and did everything they could to keep us from experiencing.
The FISC judges themselves have a duty to police their own courts and call to account  these bad actors who, by all facts in the documentation I’ve personally seen, have committed a fraud upon the court. If these judges do not have the integrity to self-police in this matter, we in Congress must hold them accountable. using the power granted to us in the Constitution, Congress has created every single federal court in the country except the Supreme Court. We have the duty to phase out, then disband the FISC, while developing a better solution to address the authorization of this sort of surveillance of foreign agents and actors. We have got to clean up the mess that the Obama administration showed is far too easy to create.
.
If you want answers, and you CAN handle the truth, join me in demanding those answers from “Special Counsel” Robert Mueller, along with his resignation. If he were to resign, it could well be the only truly moral, ethical and decent action Mueller has undertaken in this entire investigation.
Hop on Board the OPIC – USAID Corporate Gravy Train. Operated by Senior Executive Service. Fueled by U.S. Taxpayers.
Tuesday, April 24, 2018 6:30 PM

Foreign aid transfers money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries

It goes without saying that most Americans do not trust the phrase “foreign aid” and would rather stop giving money away to “foreign countries” and give that same money to U. S. citizens who are in economic need. In 2016, Obama’s State Department and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) gave away over $50 billion dollars in “alleged” foreign aid. This does not take into account the tens of billions the U. S. federal government gives away yearly to the United Nations and its agencies that are supposed to be doing the same job that USAID claims it is doing.

These United Nations agencies, such as: the World Health Organization, UNESCO, UN Peacekeepers, the UN Refugee Agency, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the many other U. N. agencies seem to be equally incapable of helping people in need as is the USAID. Lots of money gets spent, and the same problems continue unabated. It is disgraceful.

When you look at Hillary Clinton’s State Department “pay-to-play” schemes with foreign governments, you can see an added layer of overt corruption and cronyism between the source of U. S. foreign aid (U. S. State Department) and the recipients of the money.

The American Intelligence Media demonstrates in the evidence presented below, that all U. S. aid is paid to U. S. corporations and individuals who act as a channel for the money to reach the “intended” recipients who are ostensibly in great need.

In fact, $50 billion a year is parceled out to the same old corporate cronies that it is always given to — Wells Fargo, Citibank, hedge funds, off-shore shell companies, etc. Then, other organizations, like the pseudo-government agency called the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), add to the flow of money with huge loans guaranteed by the United States government. Therefore, the U. S. tax payer pays three times for the same alleged assistance going to some foreign country where few Americas ever go or may even have heard of.

Only American corporations, banks, insurance companies, hedge funds, personal individuals and the like may receive U. S. foreign aid – not foreign governments or foreigners.

Therefore, USAID is not foreign aid and it is not aid at all, it is venture capital and investments in U. S. corporations and their agents.

It is also well-known that most of this “international development” money never reaches the intended goal. Often there is little or no compliance follow-through or reporting requirements. OPIC is the worst for this type of mismanagement.

Essentially, any “U. S. sponsor” can file for an OPIC loan and loan guarantee and if the U. S. bureaucracy – Senior Executive Service – says yes, then the applicant can basically count on OPIC funding the project for the entire length of the project, which is often ten years.

This report provides many OPIC funding examples that show the transparent corruption and obvious theft of OPIC funding through corporate cronyism and bureaucratic obfuscation and deceit. The use of off-shore tax havens or Delaware incorporations for many of the recipient U. S. sponsor companies reads like a cheap criminal novel.

Delek Group to drill Tamar-8 well offshore Israel 

.

In one OPIC contract in 2016, Noble Energy was given a $4.5 billion dollar loan to drill for oil in Israel so that foreign companies could benefit from the proceeds. Power plants in Jordan, Israel, and Ukraine are funded by OPIC so that there will be power supplied for oil companies to exploit and fleece foreign nations, often surrounded by hostilities requiring U. S. military presence to “support” the U. S. corporation.

OPIC also provides a huge amount of loans to banks to make smaller loans to other banks, themselves, or customers. OPIC simply gives money to banks and calls it foreign aid, or international development. These types of corrupt practices are only slightly hidden. The sleight of hand is passed off as a noble and humanitarian deed that should be unquestionable because it is based upon the theoretical premise of “helping” other nations.

It is also helpful to realize that U. S. State Department “aid” is usually in the form of weapon contracts with leading U. S. military contractors, the largest companies in the world, who also make weapons for our enemies.

This is considered U. S. “foreign aid”, even though private multi-national military contractors benefit from the “aid” more than anyone else. In fact, the U. S. money is simply given to the corporation along with the weapons order made by the country being “given” this “aid.”

The big question then arises, “Who gets the $50 billion or so each year? Who determines who gets this money?”

Of course, one might imagine that the U. S. Congress or the White House or the Secretary of State might carefully review the national security and economic considerations of throwing $50 billion around the world in foreign aid. Actually, none of the above make the decisions. Senior Executive Service members in the State Department, U. S. Treasury, FBI, CIA, NSA, and many other federal agencies work together through the Senior Executive Association to set the standards for giving this money to the same channels they have been told to give it to for a long, long time. Bureaucratic status quo tendencies die hard, especially when the usual criminals are expecting their cut of the pie.

Take for example Crown Agents USA Inc. who pose as an humanitarian relief agency which has the capacity to “accomplish anything” that USAID or OPIC need done. They are a trusted British agency that goes back to the year 1711 and have been serving the British Crown ever since. Yes, British “agents” simply stand in line and get their share of the U. S. “foreign aid” pie and then take the money to Africa (in most cases) to help the very Africans who they already manipulate by owning the corporations that control African economics (banks, gas stations, media, etc.). In other words, USAID and OPIC give Crown Agents USA Inc. (actually owned by the British Crown) money and huge loans to enrich their personal “overseas” ventures.

They take money for humanitarian causes as if they were a philanthropic organization and yet are simply well-established criminals stealing from the poor to give to the rich.

This system of lies and deceit go back to the oldest institutions on the globe – the Vatican, the Vatican Bank, the Knights of Malta, the Venetian bankers of the crusades, the German spice-trading banker families, the Dutch and British East India Companies (corporations), and other economic terrorists who “traded with the sword.” The creation of corporations as the nemesis of nations has led us to nation-fleecing as third world countries are targeted for “foreign aid” but, in fact, become subjects of foreign resource manipulation and economic slavery.

History of OPIC

Congress created OPIC (Overseas Private Investment Corporation) in 1969 through an amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act during Nixon’s Administration. It began in 1971, with a portfolio of $8.4 billion in political risk insurance and $169 million in loan guaranties.

Organized as a corporation with a corporate structure, OPIC is governed by a Board of Directors, President and CEO, and Executive Vice President, all nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. The majority of the Board of Directors, including its President, are “drawn from private life and have business experience.”  OPIC is appropriated administrative funding, and reauthorized on a regular basis, by the U.S. Congress.

OPIC is run by the Senior Executive Service at a cost of $88 million per year with another $20 million a year for other “expenses.” OPIC “claims” to be both private and an agency “paid for” by the U. S. government.

You really can’t have both, but it comes in handy when you want to hide the “private” books of the “corporation” that is paid for by Americans and claims to be “self-funding.”

OPIC is the U. S. government’s development finance institution that claims to advance the foreign policy of the United States and its national security objectives but actually provides monetary support of U. S. corporations. OPIC claims to work with the U.S. private sector tohelp businesses gain footholds in foreign markets. OPIC claims to create revenue, jobs and growth opportunities principally at home and secondarily abroad.

It provides U. S. investors with financing, political risk insurance, and support for private equity investment funds. OPIC costs Americans $108 million to operate per year and expands U. S. business enterprises in more than 160 countries offering political risk insurance to cover civil strife and business interruption.

OPIC maintains a portfolio of more than $20 billion, which has doubled over this past decade. This portfolio spans more than 160 developing countries. Other highlights include:

  • Since 1974, OPIC has committed over $11.7 billion in support of 537 projects in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Since 1974, OPIC has committed more than $1.9 billion for 131 projects in Pakistan.
  • Since 1974, OPIC has committed more than $10.1 billion in support of 505 projects in the MENA region.
  • OPIC’s portfolio in the Middle East and North Africa currently totals $3.4 billion across 66 projects.
  • Since 2004, OPIC has committed nearly $629 million in 32 projects in Iraq, the Middle East and North Africa.
  • Approximately $6.9 billion of OPIC’s current $20 billion portfolio is in post-conflict nations.
  • Priority countries for OPIC include: Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Ukraine, Georgia, Tunisia, and the West Bank.
  • OPIC pledged $2 billion in financial support for private investment in the Middle East and North Africa and an additional $1 billion specifically for Egypt.
  • OPIC’s approved $500 million to support lending through local banks in Egypt and Jordan to small businesses with more than $1.9 billion in financing, guarantees, and insurance.

 

OPIC and USAID

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is an independent agency of the United States federal government that is primarily responsible for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance. With a budget of over $27 billion, USAID is one of the largest official aid agencies in the world, and accounts for more than half of all U.S. foreign aid and assistance.

Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act on September 4, 1961, which reorganized U.S. foreign assistance programs and mandated the creation of an agency to administer economic aid. USAID was subsequently established by the executive order of President John F. Kennedy, who sought to unite several existing foreign assistance organizations and programs under one agency. USAID became the first U.S. foreign assistance organization whose primary focus was long-term socioeconomic development.

USAID’s programs are authorized by Congress in the Foreign Assistance Act, which Congress supplements through directions in annual funding appropriation acts and other legislation. To support U.S. geopolitical interests, Congress appropriates exceptional financial assistance to allies, largely in the form of “Economic Support Funds” (ESF). USAID is called on to administer the bulk (90%) of ESF.

Also, when U.S. troops are in the field, USAID can supplement the “Civil Affairs” programs that the U. S. military conducts to win the friendship of local populations. In these circumstances, USAID may be directed by specially appointed diplomatic officials of the State Department, as has been done in Afghanistan and Pakistan during operations against al-Qaeda.

OPIC Collaboration with Other Federal Agencies from USAID’s broad spectrum of financial services to the private sector help pave the way for later stage OPIC support. OPIC’s tools build on and amplify USAID investments. OPIC and USAID’s staff meet every quarter to share information about projects and decide how to refer projects to one another, allocate or share investment risks.

2016 OPIC Funding Contracts

Let’s look at the 2016 loans and guarantees given out by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) to examine the patterns of corruption and circular logic that underpins most of these allocations. We see the regular pattern that banks are giving money to other banks or to cover new banking programs within their own banks. Huge amounts of money go for future “small loans” to bank customers or low-income loans. The code words that sound “humanitarian” are used but are simply a ruse, like: financing, leasing, microfinanced loans, and many other types of financial instruments that are internal banking operations that are not subject to detail reporting.

Bank Maneuvers

Banco Davivienda S.A. – Loan will be used to lend to low-income home buyers throughout Colombia. $324 million –  U.S. Sponsor: Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.

Yes Bank Limited – Will make loans to small and medium enterprises throughout India. $200 million – U.S. Sponsor: Wells Fargo Bank N. A.

Banco BAC San José, S.A. – Will stimulate the local economy of Costa Rica by providing access to finance and leasing for small and medium-sized enterprises. $86 million – U. S. Sponsor: Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.

Andrew and Williamson – Refinancing of Wells Fargo loan involving a farm in Mexico. OPIC Guaranty Amount: $3.4   41,666.80 Total Project Cost: $20 million – Wells Fargo Bank N . A.

Greenland Fedha Limited – Microfinance loans. $12 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank N. A.

Financiera Compartamos (Peru) – Microfinance loans. $15 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank N. A.

LOLC MicroCredit Limited – Microfinance loans in Sri Lanka. $5 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank

MicroCred Senegal – Microfinance loans. $2 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank N. A.

Accion Microfinance Bank – Microfinance loans in Nigeria. $1.6 – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank, N. A.

Isik Tarim (Turkey) –  Manufacturing, packing and exporting organic dried fruits and nuts. $5 million – U. S. Sponsor: Citibank, N. A.

Unreasonable Capital Fund I, L.P. Sponsor – Loans to Unreasonable Capital Fund I LP to expand their portfolio of investments in small and medium enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America. $15 million

Financiera Fama, S.A. – Expansion of Borrower’s commercial lending business to capitalize on significant unmet demand among micro, small and medium companies in Nicaragua. $7.7 million

M. Suresh Botswana Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $15 million – Botswana Finance LLC

Commercial International Bank (Egypt) – Will guaranty local currency loans by the Lenders to small and medium enterprises, microfinance institutions, non-banking financial institutions and other approved borrowers. $70 million

Sociedad Financiera Equipate, S.A. de C.V. – Expansion of Equipa-T’s microlending business to capitalize on significant unmet demand among low income entrepreneurs in Mexico. $10 million

Capital Bank of Jordan – Guaranty authority to a participating bank in the Jordan Loan Guaranty Facility. $20 million – Global Communities

PJSC Agroprosperis Bank (Ukraine) – Expand working capital financing and other similar lending to farmers in Ukraine. $23.7 million – U.S. Sponsor: NCH Agribusiness Partner II

PJSC Bank Vostok (Ukraine) – Expansion of lending portfolio. $8 million – U.S. Sponsor: Financial Services Volunteer Corps

LEDFC – A non-bank financial institution focused on SME lending in Liberia. $36 million – U.S. Sponsor: Mrs. Yvonne Nduom and Dr. Papa Kwesi Nduom

Schulze Global Mongolia Debt Facility – Providing senior secured loans to small and medium size enterprises in Mongolia. $11 million –  U.S. Sponsor: Gabriel Schulze

Acord Capital SAS (Colombia) and Acord Capital SRL (Dominican Republic) – To support the development of its equipment leasing operation in Colombia and the Dominican Republic. $8.5 million – U.S. Sponsor: IDICO

Colombia – Colombian real-estate focused investment fund. $250 million

Golomt Bank LLC –  Expansion of the bank’s lending portfolio in Mongolia. $15.4 million

LOLC Micro Credit Limited – Expansion of LOMC’s micro loan and lease portfolio in Sri Lanka. $15.4 million

Ndugutu Power Company Uganda Limited – Will provide a loan to support KMRI LLC, a U.S. small business, to develop, construct and operate a run-of-river hydro power plant in western Uganda. $16.6 million

Trau Bros. (Pty) Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $8 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC

Eurostar Botswana Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $30 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC

KGK Diamonds – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $15 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC

Blue Star Diamonds Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $20 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC

LOLC Plc. – Will support the expansion of LOLC’s home improvement loan portfolios in Cambodia. $59 million – U.S. Sponsor: DWM Asset Management, LLC.

Federación de Cajas de Crédito y de Bancos de los Trabajadores, S.C. de R.L. de C.V – Loan proceeds and the borrower’s investment will be disbursed to finance Fedecredito’s loans to its member entities in El Salvador. $15.4 million – U.S. Sponsor: Financial Services Volunteer Corps

FATEN (Palestine for Credit and Development) – Loan guaranty support for SMEs operating in the Palestinian territories. $151.2 million – U.S. Sponsor: Middle East Investment Initiative

Early Dawn Microfinance Company Ltd. – Will lend to DAWN, a microfinance institution in Myanmar. $13.5 million – U.S. Sponsor: Accion Gateway Fund, LLC

XacBank LLC Project Description – Will support on-lending to women-owned SMEs in Mongolia. $78.6 million – U.S. Sponsor: Cargill Financial Services Incorporated

MFX Solutions, Inc. – Increase investment guaranty to MFX Solutions, Inc., a U.S.-based organization that offers currency hedging services. $224 million – U.S. Sponsor: MFX Solutions, LLC

Apis Growth Fund II, L.P. – The Fund will invest in a diversified portfolio of growth-stage companies that aim to provide financial services in selected growth markets across Africa and South Asia. $400 million

Helios Credit Partners, L.P. – The Fund will seek to provide senior secured and second-lien loans to companies in Sub-Saharan Africa that require capital for growth, acquisitions or capital expenditures. $300 million – U.S. Sponsor: Helios Investment Partners LLP

Acrecent México, S.A.P.I de C.V. –  Will serve as an important lender for a small business in Mexico where similar long-term capital is not readily available. $17 million – U.S. Sponsor: Acrecent Financial Corporation

Siempre Creciendo, S.A. de C.V. – The Project is the expansion of Creciendo’s lending business to capitalize on significant unmet demand among low income entrepreneurs in Mexico. $10.3 million

Financiera Desyfin S.A. – Expansion of Borrower’s loans and leasing activities to Costa Rican SMEs. $10.3 million

Oil and Gas

The level of corruption found in the oil and gas “investments” of OPIC are blatantly insider deals that enrich foreign government’s nationalized oil industry as well as foreign corporations. What could possibly justify such investments that do not even compile with the overt advancement of U. S. corporations. When it comes to oil and gas, political maneuvering is seen on both sides of the crooked deal.

In the cases listed below, you will see that no U. S. sponsor is even required. The money goes directly to companies that are connected to nationalized industries. One might ask, “Why are U. S. tax dollars going into the pockets of oil barons?”

Contracts

Noble Energy International Limited – The project is the development of the Israeli offshore Leviathan gas field. $4.5 billion

ERU Corporation Foreign Enterprise – The expansion of a gas trading business by ERU Trading in Ukraine. $70 million

Naftogaz Gas Sale and Repurchase Facility – Will sell gas to a special purpose vehicle during the summer in Ukraine and will use the proceeds of such sale for liquidity. $500 million – U. S. Sponsor: Goldman Sachs International

Amandi Energy Limited – Development, construction, and operation of a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine power plant in Aboadze, Ghana. $542 million – Rand Merchant Bank and Nedbank(Mauritius)

.

Offshore or Tax Haven

Any time you see the names Mauritius, Panama, Delaware, or the Cayman Islands you are probably dealing with an illegal off-shore account or a spurious tax haven corporation that is less than ethical, if not completely illegal. Setting up shell companies in the Caymans is standard operating procedure for the recipients of OPIC and USAID funding.

From the outset, the dummy U. S. sponsor company that funnels the money into untraceable tax havens is indicating its intent to conduct a shady business deal involving corruption, money-laundering, tax evasion, and general theft as part of the business plan.

Contracts

Somerset Indus Healthcare Fund II (Mauritius) – Will seek to invest in products and services platforms that provide access to healthcare as well as help to increase access to healthcare outside the major urban population centers in India. $25,000,000

Scotiabank de Costa Rica, S.A. – The proceeds of the loan will be used to expand the Bank’s small and medium-sized enterprises loan portfolio in Costa Rica. $15 million

Banco Delta, S.A. – Expansion of a housing finance program marketed to non-salaried micro-entrepreneurs and small business owners in Panama. $41.5 million

African Local Currency Bond Fund (Mauritius) – Will facilitate local currency bond issuances for institutions. $40 million – U. S. Sponsor: Calvert Social Investment Foundation

WRB Serra Partners Fund I, L.P. (Delaware) – Will provide equity investments to infrastructure assets and related financing and other service companies in renewable energy, electric/water utilities and energy efficiency sectors in the Caribbean, Mexico, South America and Central America. $14 million

WaterCredit Investment Fund 3, LLC (Delaware) – Will aggregate and deploy $50 million in social investment capital to microfinance institutions to scale up their water and sanitation lending portfolios. $20 million

BRAC Africa Microfinance Ltd. (Cayman Islands) – To expand its portfolio of micro-loans serving mainly female clients in urban and rural areas in Myanmar. $6.7 – U.S. Sponsor: BRAC USA

Phatisa Food Fund 2 L.L.C. (Mauritius) – Will make growth equity investments in food and agriculture-related companies in Sub-Saharan Africa. $300 million

Sanergy, Inc. – Expansion of social enterprise in the sanitation sector, including a new animal feed production facility in Kenya. $12.8 – U.S. Sponsor: Sanergy, Inc. (Delaware)

Four Rivers Real Estate, Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) – Initiate the development of its 18-story office building, complete its construction, and to operate it in Myanmar. $41.4 million – U.S. Sponsor: Four Rivers (Cayman Islands)

Power Plants

When OPIC loans money for a power plant, it should add, “a power plant to provide energy for oil and gas drilling operations”. These power plants are certainly not for the common person, they are to advance the exploitation of natural resources and the continued fleecing of those resources for state or personal gain.

The other power plant scam concerns photovoltaic and wind farm power plants that have a U. S. sponsor who is simply the middle man who takes a big profit for arranging a “deal.” Again, the transparency of these criminal enterprises is quite clear. Nowhere is anyone talking about the people they have helped in these foreign countries with this “foreign aid.”

Contracts

Acajutla Energía Solar 1, Ltda. de C.V. and Sonsonate Solar, S.A. de C.V. – Development, construction, and operation of two solar power photovoltaic plants in Acajutla, El Salvador. $65 million

AM Solar B.V. (Jordan) –  Development, construction, and operation of a solar PV power plant located in Al Manakher, Amman, Jordan. $56 million

Central Storage Safety Project Trust (Delaware) – Development and construction of the Central Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility located in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. $410 million. Ukrainian State Enterprise National Nuclear Energy Generating Company

PT Energi Bayu Jeneponto – The development, construction, commissioning and operation of a wind farm in Indonesia. $160 million US Sponsor: Equis Energy

Tè Power Company – Will construct and operate a thermal power plant in Guinea. $110 million – U.S. Sponsor: Endeavor Guinea Power Holdings LLC

Bosforo LTDA de C.V. – Development, construction and operation of ten solar power photovoltaic plants built in El Salvador. $164 million – U.S. Sponsor: AES Corporation (Delaware)

Bangweulu Power Company Limited – Will develop, construct and operate a solar photovoltaic independent power project in Zambia. $60 million – U.S. Sponsor: First Solar, Inc

India Name of Borrower: Orb Energy Private Limited – The origination, financing and installation of solar photovoltaic systems in India by the borrower’s subsidiary, and the refinancing of existing senior debt in India. $15,5 million – U.S. Sponsors: Acumen Fund Meridiam Africa Investments SAS – Will develop, own and operate a photovoltaic solar farm in Senegal.  $43 million

ReNew Wind Energy Private Limited – The Project will result in the construction of a solar PV located in a solar park in the state of Karnataka, India. $46.3 million – U.S. Sponsor: ReNew Power Ventures Private Limited

Proyecto La Trinidad, Ltda. de C.V. – Development, construction and operation of solar power photovoltaic plants in El Salvador. $70 million – U.S. Shareholders: Latin Renewable Infrastructure Funds L.P. (Delaware)

Geotérmica Platanares, S.A. de C.V. – Will provide continuous baseload power to the grid in Western Honduras. $180 million – U.S. Sponsor: Ormat Technologies, Inc.

Other Ventures

Let’s see if there is a single contract below that you cannot see the overt financial scam that may be going on that the Senior Executive Service corruptocrat administrators didn’t notice when they passed these contracts across their desks.

Contracts

Africa Eye Foundation- Eye hospital in Cameroon focused solely on eye care. Total $10.2 million – U.S. Sponsor: Conrad N. Hilton Foundation

Friends of Cambodian Education Inc. (Texas) – Long-term restructuring of existing construction financing for a new campus in Cambodia. $45.8 million

Mountain Enterprises International, Inc. (Tajikistan) –  Processing local agricultural crops to sell snack products. $4.5 million

Tugende Limited Project Description: Tugende provides lease-to-own financing to motorcycle taxi drivers in Uganda. $6.6 – U.S. Sponsors: Michael Wilkerson

SilverStreet Private Equity Strategies – Four farms in the consolidate the four farms into a single commercial entity in Zambia. $28.2 million

Alistair James Company Limited – Expansion of a regional logistics company-based in Tanzania. $44.7 million – U.S. Sponsor: Alistair, Alden, James & Clementine James

International School of Ulaanbaatar – Will support ISU’s campus expansion project, which includes construction of new classrooms, science laboratories, and other campus improvements in Mongolia. $36 million

Obama’s 2016 USAID Highlights

Obama’s FY 2016 Budget provides $50.3 billion in discretionary funding for the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), including $7.0 billion in Overseas Contingency Operations.

This includes:

  • Dedicating $3.5 billion to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and respond to the crisis in Syria, bolster regional security, and provide for related humanitarian needs;
  • Providing $1 billion to address the root causes of migration from Central America, including the migration of unaccompanied children;
  • Investing in clean energy, sustainable landscapes, and adaptation through the Global Climate Change Initiative to support a healthy global environment, climate-smart growth, and improved resilience to the impacts of climate change for the most vulnerable countries;
  • Providing $4.6 billion for international organizations and peacekeeping missions to share global security responsibilities with other nations and respond to new peacekeeping requirements;
  • Investing $4.8 billion to support security requirements and overseas infrastructure to support the people, infrastructure, and programs that enable U.S. operations and relations with foreign governments;
  • Advancing the President’s commitment to global health by: investing in programs to end preventable child and maternal deaths; combating infectious disease threats in support of the Global Health Security Agenda; and creating an AIDS-free generation by supporting targeted global HIV/AIDS efforts, including through a new PEPFAR Impact Fund; and
  • Countering Russian pressure and aggressive actions by providing essential support for Ukraine and neighboring countries in the region.

.

To get a visual impression of the amount of aid sent to foreign countries (through US emissaries), we turn to this very useful chart created by howmuchnet.

https://howmuch.net/articles/usa-foreign-aid-by-country

.

How much net compiled data from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for 2016, and keeps track of how much money U.S. taxpayers send overseas. The red countries on the map above is where the U.S. spends billions of dollars each year. Foreign aid also tends to follow U.S. troop deployments. The U.S. spends more than $18.3 billion in conflict reduction in foreign countries.

The total budget for USAID in 2016 is approximately $40 billion. Another $10 billion is spent outside of the control of USAID.

Here are the top ten recipients of USAID funds for 2016:

  1. Iraq: $5,281,179,380 (for conflicts, peace and security)
  2. Afghanistan: $5,060,306,051 (for conflicts, peace and security)
  3. Israel: $3,113,310,210 (for conflicts, peace and security)
  4. Egypt: $1,239,291,240 (for conflicts, peace and security)
  5. Jordan: $1,214,093,785 (for conflicts, peace and security)
  6. Kenya: $1,143,552,649 (for population policies and reproductive health)
  7. Ethiopia: $1,111,152,703 (for emergencies)
  8. Syria: $916,426,147 (for emergencies)
  9. Pakistan: $777,504,870 (for conflicts, peace and security)
  10. Uganda: $741,326,448 (for population policies and reproductive health)

 

USAID: From Its Website

According to the USAID website, “it is the mission of USAID to help USAID partners to end extreme poverty and promote resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security and prosperity.”

IN REALITY: Please notice that the truth of who benefits from USAID is stated in the opening line – “while advancing our security and prosperity” refers to U.S. corporate interests supported by the U.S. military and especially by the CIA that watches over U. S. international interests.

.

Help End Preventable Child Deaths: $2.8 billion for USAID Global Health Programs, which along with State Department Global Health Programs, contributes to global efforts to support three goals: ending preventable child and maternal deaths, creating an AIDS-free generation, and protecting communities from infectious diseases.

IN REALITY: The US already gives billion to the United Nations’ World Health Organization that supposedly accomplishes these same goals. USAID money goes to radical birth control programs that disseminate immunizations that are sometimes laced with drugs that sterilize the recipient. The dissemination of AIDS drugs is a pharmaceutical scam that enriches corporations that manipulate drug prices.

Towards Ending Hunger: $978 million for the Feed the Future initiative in support of food security and agriculture programs to reduce hunger, extreme poverty, and malnutrition. Feed the Future reached nearly seven million smallholder farmers with new technologies.

IN REALITY: This is carte blanche for Monsanto and Bill Gate’s “Green Program” being spread throughout Africa and Asia to take control of all food production in third world countries. Also note that 1/3 of the money was given to theoretical “climate change” channels of money that have swallowed hundreds of billions of dollars and gain no appreciable “help” to anyone.

.

Promote More Democratic Societies and Institutions: $2.4 billion for democracy, human rights, and governance programs with specific increases in Central America, Asia, and Africa to ensure that our development investments are sustainable and transparent.

IN REALITY: Used corporate espionage, the CIA, and NGO’s to create “regime change” and spread chaos throughout the area, except for US businesses that receive the USAID funds.

.

Improve Prosperity and Economic Growth in Central America: Nearly $500 million to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to advance economic prosperity through reducing poverty, improving education and workforce development, and strengthening resilience in the region.

IN REALITY: Allowed Central American gangs to proliferate unabated throughout America and help them gain U.S. citizenship.

.

Connect and Empower Africa: $300 million to support key commitments and investments in Africa, including Power Africa to increase access to reliable, cleaner power for economic growth.

IN REALITY: This is insider corporate back-scratching where USAID pays an international corporation to buy and install its own “clean power” in a foreign nation under the auspices of climate change.

.

Enhance Science, Technology, Innovation, Evaluation and Learning, and Partnership: $190.5 million in funding for the Global Development Lab and the Policy, Planning, and Learning (PPL) Bureau.

IN REALITY: This is a fund that is simply self-enrichment for USAID itself under the auspices of helping more people.

.

Rebalance the Asia-Pacific Region: $687.5 million to support the expansion of efforts to strengthen governance and democratic processes, foster engagement with civil society, and promote rule of law and respect of human rights in the Asia-Pacific region.

IN REALITY: Covert funding for CIA led “democracy” movements that are a cover for protecting US corporate interests overseas.

.

Most Vulnerable Populations: $3.1 billion in USAID-managed humanitarian assistance is provided principally for emergency food supplies and the underlying causes of food insecurity, assistance to internally displaced persons, and victims of conflict and natural disaster.

IN REALITY: Remember that these funds do not go to the “people who are vulnerable” but instead go to organizations like Crown Agents USA Inc. and other supposedly “humanitarian” organizations that skim off the top and leave the rest for victims.

.

Food Aid Reform: Spends $350 million, for cash-based food assistance for emergencies.

IN REALITY: This small amount cannot touch the true needs of people starving throughout the world and we watch millions die of starvation while USAID spends billions on useless projects and only $350 million for the starving populations of the third world.

.

Support Agency Operations: $1.4 billion in USAID operating expenses to sustain ongoing operations, make significant improvements in procurement, local capacity building, innovation, and accountability.

IN REALITY: This is a ridiculous cost for running an agency that simply “gives money away” and barely keeps track of it.

.

USAID is Not US Aid

Just as President Trump has defunded numerous areas of the United Nations because they simply were not doing their job, so too, he should give consideration to defunding USAID and the OPIC and make sure the fake “humanitarian” aid groups like Crown Agents USA Inc. are never given another penny of relief funds for those in need. Just like the United Nations Refugee program or the World Health Organization, the USAID and the OPIC should be defunded. Then, they should have their assets frozen by the U. S. Treasury while being audited and their assets seized.

The USAID and the OPIC are only considered legal because they have become institutionalized crime and the career bureaucrats in the Senior Executive Service keep the status quo maintained while no questions about these crimes are ever shared with anyone outside of the insider groups. These groups have personally benefited from the standard streams of money that have kept the usual recipients fat and happy.

Perhaps Ivanka Trump will be able to show her dad the corruption  once she is on the inside of OPIC:

Ivanka Trump Joins Senior Executive Service-Run OPIC Initiative

The time has come to stop paying foreign aid that does not fully reach the people need it. U. S. corporations should not be funded through this type of insider siphoning-off of foreign aid. U. S. corporations should not be supported by the U. S. military in foreign countries, especially if the corporation is there to fleece the third world country of its resources.

The C. I. A. should not be involved in protecting and benefiting U. S. or any corporations. This type of economic world domination by corporations under the guise of helping other nations must end.

The time has come to acknowledge that U. S. foreign aid is not aid to foreign nations but is a simple self-enrichment program for U. S. and international corporations flying under a false flag.

.

Betsy and Thomas discuss this article
THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT USES SES, SERCO, AND OPIC AS PORTALS INTO UNSPEAKABLE CORRUPTION
Friday, April 20, 2018 9:53 PM

By Americans for Innovation

Article Image: The Icon of the Ladder of Divine Ascent is connected with the well-known spiritual classic book entitled The Ladder of Divine Ascent by Saint John Climacus, of the seventh century. It inspired by Jacob’s dream where God–the Great I Am–promised to keep him in all places and that he should not be afraid. Genesis 28:12-15.

.

These lawyers, bankers, academics, journalists, bureaucrats and otherwise self-styled elitists sponge off the actual wealth-creation of hard working Americans via SES, OPIC, Lockheed Martin, Crown Agents, Serco, USAID in pursuit of the seven deadly sins.

Since they don’t do real work, President Trump can simply turn their lights off.

Then, he can use the trillions of dollars recovered to empower real wealth creators of America.

.

Apr. 20, 2018–Americans for Innovation began this investigation in 2012 to try and understand why the U.S. Supreme Court failed to protect Leader Technologies’ revolutionary invention of social networking–even after Leader proved that Facebook infringed their patent on 11 of 11 claims.

What we have discovered is a labyrinth of organized sin and corruption that permeates practically every institution on our planet. Besides watching the Leader v. Facebook court ignore well-settled precedent to protect Facebook, the judges themselves held volumes of Facebook financial interests.

Judges are expressly prohibited by their sworn Code of Conduct from engaging in such immoral and illegal activity. They are prohibited from holding “even one share” by a spouse in a litigant. The games that our judges, politicians and bureaucrats are currently playing by hiding their financial holdings in large corporate litigants behind conspiring mutual funds is just obscene. This corrupt practice began in earnest after a #judicial-conference-mutual-fund-scam" target="_blank">Judicial Conference in March 2001—six months before 9/11 & the theft of Leader’s social networking invention—without public hearing or debate. We call it The Great Mutual Fund Scam.

Here are the corrupt judges and clerk in Leader v. Facebook who each failed to disqualify himself/herself due to his/her substantial holdings in Facebook financial interests. Each person gained great wealth from the Facebook initial public offering in #federal-circuit" target="_blank">2012, this is without even knowing the extent of their offshore accounts. They also failed to disclose their intimate relationships with Facebook’s appeal attorney Thomas G. Hungar, Gibson Dunn LLP:

Our initial scratching at the surface of this injustice to Leader Technologies has now given way to bulldozers and dump trucks. We have teamed up with corruption fighters from around the globe. We have worked to meticulously document these crimes with indictable evidence that some are calling the Crimeline. It was intended as a research tool for lawyers, judges, politicians and the media to help speed up the coming prosecutions.

Honest citizens of the world cannot allow these corruptocrats to succeed. [Note: Over a year ago we sent a copy of this Crimeline to then Senator Jeff Sessions before he became Attorney General.]

Leader Technologies’ shareholders are currently asking President Trump to pay them for the 18-year theft of their social networking invention by the federal government and our rogue Silicon Valley technology community. They have filed “Miller Act Notices” at the White House and have proposed a remarkable Win-Win fix for the horrific problems that this theft has caused. See Leader Technologies files trillion dollar bond lien on the U.S.

Big Picture: The corruptocrats stole Leader’s invention to speed up their globalist takeover

What is the connection with Leader Technologies’ social networking invention? These corruptocrats stole it because they knew it would speed up their takeover of the U.S. Republic. They appear to have been right about that. “Social networking” appeared almost overnight like a Phoenix via the #ibm-eclipse-formed" target="_blank">IBM Eclipse Foundation in early 2004 once Leader Technologies had finished debugging their source code. See #ibm-eclipsecon-2004" target="_blank">First annual IBM EclipseCon 2004, Feb. 2-5, 2004 (Facebook started Feb. 4, 2004).

Once we proved the immediate evidence of the Leader v. Facebook corruption, we widened our lens aperture to look at who and what was behind these peoples’ choices to be so corrupt.

In summary, the following organizations came into focus:

  1. Senior Executive Service (SES),
  2. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC),
  3. Serco,
  4. USAID,
  5. Crown Agents, and
  6. Lockheed Martin.

We knew a little about Lockheed and USAID, but nothing about SES, OPIC, Serco or the Crown Agents. Considering that these organizations move hundreds of billions of dollars of American tax money around the planet, why are they not in our civic consciousness? The MSM has been silent and has clearly failed to hold them accountable, as is their job. Now we know that this gaggle of criminals are the successors of Nazi Brown Shirts for the Deep State shadow government. They could cease tomorrow and the world would only improve, wars would stop, and a new era of human creativity will be unleashed.

SES & OPIC constitutes an unconstitutional secret government, but it’s worse. Other governments help drive the SES sedition bus.

The Senior Executive Services (SES) includes over 8,000 Obama stay-behind senior federal employees in all agencies of the U.S. government. They openly state that they cannot be fired by the President, which means they are not accountable to our Republic and have a law unto themselves. See our previous post Obama hired them. Trump cannot fire them. So they say.  It went viral 30 days ago with an estimated 500,000 views. The story is out.

Former FBI Director James B. Comey’s book title speaks volumes: A Higher Loyalty. Evidently Mr. Comey believes his oath to serve America does not include its leaders if he decides to have a globalist agenda. His associations with Lockheed Martin and London-based HSBC clearly show that he leads this coup against American sovereignty. The arrogance of his current book road show speaks volumes about his moral character.

Connecting the dots, AFI, Leader Technologies, American Intelligence Media (AIM) and other researchers from groups like The Right Media, Anonymous, the real Q and KimDotCom among them have helped uncovered primary institutions through which the SES funds its sedition–totally outside of We The People Congressional oversight.

To see more on Serco and its papertrail back to RCA Photophone see:

What is the real truth about Serco?

.

Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC)

The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) was formed on January 19, 1971 in an amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. The Act had previously formed the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) which is closely aligned with OPIC’s seditious activity.

OPIC is actually a corporation whose sole shareholder is the U.S. Secretary of State. The #page=202" target="_blank">SES provides the executive staffing and leadership for OPIC.

Herein is the scandalous scamming of America. Through convoluted legal gobbledygook, OPIC as a company and not a federal agency per se is solely “owned” by the Secretary of State. OPIC is staffed by the SES who state openly that they #page=228" target="_blank">cannot be fired by the President; therefore, by direct inference don’t work for him– even though the President appoints the Secretary of State, their sole shareholder.

As if this couldn’t get more twisted, the Secretary of State is an SES member and technically cannot be fired by the President, who works for We The People.  This likely means that We The People have no control over SES or OPIC– even though we fund them both. The lawyers who wrote these laws and regulations (and then protect these entities from FOIA transparency) should be shot for this treasonous word play.

While Rex Tillerson recently left his position as Secretary of State, being SES himself, we doubt he was fired. Just look at how Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions–also SES–is stubbornly hanging on, almost begging the President to challenge his SES employment protections.

OPIC is run by the SES according to the #ses-plum-books-1996-2016" target="_blank">Plum Books from 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012 and 2016. The 2016 Plum Books state clearly on p. 218. Since the documents intentionally fail to define the phrase “independent regulatory commission” it could mean anything if challenged and must be assumed to mean all SES members. Whether narrowly or broadly defined, thousands of federal employees fall into this insulation from Presidential authority:

.

Fig. 4—The SES Plum book claims that the President cannot fire them. #page=228" target="_blank">S. Prt. 114-26. (Dec. 01, 2016). Plum Book, Policy and Supporting Positions. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. U.S. Senate, 114th Congress, 2d Session, p. 218 (PDF p. 228). GPO.

.

OPIC’s 2017 Annual Management Report says they have provided $23.2 billlion in benefits—all decisions made by the SES.

Conclusion: SES-OPIC is a rogue outfit ever since the SES was formed in 1978.

SES + OPIC + USAID + Serco + Crown Agents + Lockheed

The more our investigators dove into the seditious SES-OPIC labyrinth, the deeper it went, and the more convoluted it became.

They Rule the Planet
.

Serco Group Plc (UK)

Serco is led by two British knights who pledge loyalty to the Queen. There are Sir Rupert Soames and Sir Roy Gardener.

America: Meet Your British Overlords 

“Serco is the biggest company in America that you have never heard of.” Why?

Why is a company that operates the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and over 58 air traffic control system in the U.S. so obscured from the public consciousness?!

Serco Group PLC is a British company with 10,000 employees and annual revenue of $5.9 billion. Serco runs the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office!

Do you mean to tell me that the U.S. Patent Office is not capable of running itself without foreign help?! American inventors take note: You’re screwed.

Next we have Serco Group PLC. Serco is a British company with 10,000 employees. Serco runs the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office! Do you mean to tell me that the US Patent Office is not capable of running itself without foreign help?

We could not believe this either, but here is Serco’s 2015 press release announcing its deal with Obama.. No reasonable person can view this as anything but sedition. This alone should get your blood boiling, but it gets much, much worse.

Serco has 11 contracts with the U.S. Army, Navy, SPAWAR, Intelligence, Air Force, Coast Guard, Marines, US Border Patrol as well as the Transportation and Commerce Departments.

Serco operates 58 U.S. air traffic control towers!

Serco has major contracts with the FCC, FTC, FAA, DOJ, DOS, DHS, ERO, ICE, GSA, prisons, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp and even run U.S. military boot camps.

Serco runs major public works in Chicago, Colorado, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Georgia.

Sweetheart Serco Honey Pots: Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity

In short, we have ceded great swaths of U.S. infrastructure to this foreign control. Many of the Serco contracts are the most lucrative imaginable. They are “Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity” contracts, meaning they are blank checks for the SES.

What? Are not American companies worthy of such honey pot contracts?

America’s corporate borders against foreign intervention were overrun long ago

More likely, these contracts reveal that America’s corporate borders were overrun long ago? Ask yourself: Why are we giving our sovereignty to the United Kingdom? That is a longer answer that is superbly answered in the just released AIM article: EXPOSED: ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS AND CORPORATIONS THAT CONTROL THE WORLD.

Serco’s American subsidiary, SI International, was founded and funded on Oct. 14, 1998 by Chicago bankers with Frontenac Company principals formerly with Booz Allen and Bain & Company (Mitt Romney). SI International’s officers included S. Bradford Antle who, according to his Bloomberg biography, was still working for Lockheed Martin where he was leading Lockheed Martin’s Washington Technical Operations with 1,700 employees. Other officers came from the U.S.  Intelligence supplier CACI, Inc. and Gen. R. Thomas Marsh came from MITRE Corp who is SES.

On Dec. 28, 2008, Serco Group PLC (UK) bought SI International and renamed it Serco, Inc.  aka Serco Services, Inc. and appointed S. Bradford Antle its President.

Antle was the Serco-Lockheed Martin Go-To Executive for the Deep State Overlords

While Brad Antle was triple-timing employment among SI International, Serco and Lockheed Martin, former FBI Director #comey-bio" target="_blank">James B. Comey was General Counsel at Lockheed Martin (2005-2010).

Now comes the very sad reality that both Antle and Comey sold out America to the British Crown via Lockeheed Martin and Serco.

Serco and Lockheed Martin run the British nuclear program

AFI investigators have discovered hard proof of sedition by Lockheed Martin, Antle and Comey.

AWE Management Limited (Atomic Weapons Establishment)

On Nov. 10, 1998, AWE Management Limited was incorporated in the United Kingdom by two lawyers who had one share each. This is a standard way lawyers start companies without involving the founders in order to handle the formation paperwork which gets amended later.

On Dec. 13, 1999, Serco Limited facilitated the updating of the stock to the real owners British Nuclear Fuels (50,000 A shares – Golden Shares controlled by the Crown), Lockheed Martin (50,000 B shares) and Serco (49,998 C shares).

Remember, just a year earlier on Oct. 14, 1998 Lockheed’s director S. Bradford Antle has just started Serco’s US predecessor SI International in Chicago.

Figure 4: #page=2" target="_blank">AWE MANAGEMENT LTD. (Dec. 13, 1999). Ownership Return of Allotment re. Lockheed, Serco and British Nuclear Fuels. Reg. No. 36645711, p. 2. Companies House.

Serco and Lockheed Martin hold 2/3rd of the shares in #page=2" target="_blank">AWE Management Limited (UK). AWE stands for Atomic Weapons Establishment. AWE runs Britain’s nuclear programs for weapons grade materials. The other 1/3rd of AWE shares are held by British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL). Most importantly, the Queen holds a “Golden Share” in AWE and its uranium mining mega supplier #page=8" target="_blank">Rio Tinto Plc giving her ultimate control.  Her Golden Share gives her absolute control.

Here is the Queen’s “Golden Share” in Rio Tinto Plc as inauspiciously recorded by hand at Companies House (London, UK) on #page=8" target="_blank">Dec. 31, 1999, p. 8. Note: When attorneys handwrite disclosures in this day and age, it is generally an intentional act in order to prevent search engines from being able to read the document.

Figure 5: Rio Tinto PLC. (Dec. 31, 1999). 2000 Annual Return, Reg. No. 719885. Companies House. Take special note that it appears that HSBC is handling Rio Tinto’s corporate filings. Also note that this filing occurred just 18 days after the On Dec. 13, 1999 AWD Management Limited. registration of shares that for British Nuclear Fuels, Lockheed Martin and Serco. Now we see HSBC in this brew. It should be noted again that former FBI Director James B. Comey was chief counsel of HSBC in 2013.

To make this circumstance even more unscrupulously confusing, the AWE Limited (UK) annual report #page=34" target="_blank">on Dec. 31, 2016 actually says in very slimy lawyerly parsing that “The directors consider Lockheed Martin Corporation, a company registered in the USA, as the ultimate parent undertaking and controlling entity.” They did not even mention the Queen’s Golden Share that ultimately controls anything having to do with uranium and atomic weapons production in the UK. The Queen via Rio Tinto actually sells them the uranium ore to produce the nuclear fuel. So, did the AWE directors check with the Queen before making this statement.

Figure 6: #page=34" target="_blank">AWE MANAGEMENT LTD. (Dec. 31, 2016). Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements. Reg. No. 36645711, p. 34. Companies House.

If we are to believe the AWE directors, Lockheed Martin controls the British nuclear program.

If we are to believe British Companies House filings, the Queen controls the nuclear program by way of her Golden Shares.

Something is horribly wrong with this picture, especially when one adds the Uranium One, Clinton, Putin, Mueller fiasco into the mix. It appears more and more likely that Putin and the Crown were jockeying over control of global uranium mining rights (Rio Tinto vs. Rosatom). Bill and Hillary Clinton knew this, so they played the American card since the Queen’s ore is enriched in the U.S. in Eunice, New Mexico.

The Queen holds a Golden Share (100% control) of #page=26" target="_blank">Rio Tinto, that operates numerous mines in Canada. In this scenario, the Uranium One deal appears to have been Bill & Hillary and The Clinton Foundation injecting themselves in the middle to get a piece of the financial action. The Kazakhstan “deal” was probably a sham, a cover, just leverage. Mueller was used as a goat to show the quality of the Eunice, NM processing of the Queen’s (READ: Frank Giustra) ore.

If the former is true, then British sovereignty over its national security has been ceded to Lockheed Martin.

If the latter is true, then America’s national security has been traded away by Lockheed Martin who is managing multiple sets of national interests and is, therefore, sometimes acting against the United States in its dealing with the United Kingdom.

Who are the common threads here? Former FBI Director James B. Comey and former Lockheed Martin director of Technical Operations in Washington, D.C. S. Bradford Antle.

It is important here to note a longer Serco thread that reaches back almost a century. Serco was founded in 1929 as RCA Services Limited, a UK division of the Radio Corporation of America (RCA). In 1985, General Electric purchased RCA. Two years later in 1987, the UK managers of RCA bought the RCA UK operations and changed the name to Serco in 1988.

These events within Serco (UK) occurred right when S. Bradford Antle worked for General Electric (and probably facilitated the sale, with the plan to eventually work for Lockheed, former SI International, then have Serco UK buy in to the US classified business via SI International). These sorts of devious convolutions have come to be expected by our researchers.

So more likely, the Queen controls the nuclear activities of both Lockheed Martin and Serco in Britain. This control then walks back to the U.S. via URENCO LIMITED (UK).

URENCO manages the U.S. nuclear enrichment plant in Eunice, NM. Curiously, in their 2018 annual report, URENCO disguises their British 1/3rd ownership by British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) and says instead that “Enrichment Investment Limited” (EIL) is the holder. Further investigation shows that EIL is a mere shell front for British Nuclear Fuels Limited. Why the deception?

British Golden Share Owner  of URENCO LIMITED (UK) which controls U.S. uranium enrichment at Louisiana Energy Services (LSE), Eunice, NM

Figure 7: BNFL ENRICHMENT LIMITED. (May 25, 2001). Certificate of Incorporation of a Private Company, Co. No. 4223635. Companies House. Renamed ENRICHMENT INVESTMENTS LIMITED on Dec. 17, 2009. BNFL is a notorious acronym for British Nuclear Fuels Limited (Plc.). See also ENCRICHMENT INVESTMENTS LIMITED. (Dec. 17, 2009). Memorandum and Articles of Association, Co. No. 4223635. Companies House. ENRICHMENT INVESTMENTS LIMITED is an alias designated on Dec. 17, 2009 for its original name BNFL ENRICHMENT LIMITED formed on May 25, 2001. BNFL is a notorious acronym for British Nuclear Fuels Limited (Plc.).

Lockheed Martin appears to be a globalist government unto itself

Lockheed’s influence over critical national security organizations on both sides of the Atlantic, including AWE, Serco, SES and OPIC is evident. However, these alliances fold back on each other, it appears that Lockheed Martin sold the American Republic down the river a long time ago.

We have two more groups to discuss, then we’ll swing back around to SES and OPIC.

Crown Agents USA Washington DC and USAID

See American Intelligence Media’s new article laying out the history of the Crown Agents.
We won’t repeat this superb research here. EXPOSED: ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS AND CORPORATIONS THAT CONTROL THE WORLD. This article includes links to actual contracts that USAID pays to Crown Agents.

Even our week-long review of government contracts shows that the U.S. government pays billions of dollars a year to Crown Agents USA Washington DC—which is a vassal of the Queen of England. Why do we not hire Americans for this work. This is another example of the corporate borders having been dropped long ago.

OPIC funds USAID and Crown Agents—globalist front men

Hidden inside OPIC are many dozens of contracts with billions of dollars awarded to Citibank. This tie to Wall Street is evident, especially considering that Citigroup was the first merged bank formed after Bill Clinton and Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (with Facebook’s Sheryl K. Sandberg in tow) abolished Glass-Steagal on #glass-steagall" target="_blank">Nov. 12, 1999.

In addition, OPIC funds hundreds, if not thousands, of USAID projects that involve financing sent through the Crown Agents as the prime contractor or supplier to a prime contractor.

For example, OPIC provided $100 million in funds and an “Impact Award” to Helios Investment Partners LLC—a creation of the Crown Agents Ltd headquartered in London. The Crown Agent’s has only one shareholder – the Crown Agents Foundation.

On Jul. 19, 1995, the Crown Agents were “privatized” meaning they became a stock company with a board of directors. The issuance of stock amounts and rights was in the complete control of the Crown’s Secretary of State, and he or she was bound by The Crown Agents Act of 1995. Here is proof that while privatization may sound like the Queen gave up control, she did not.

The Crown simply channeled its authority through the Crown’s Secretary of State who controlled the Crown Agents “privatized” successor board of directors. Therefore, the Crown has 100% control of its subsidiary in the US named Crown Agents USA Washington DC.

We should note that OPIC is similarly organized as a corporation with the U.S. Secretary of State as its sole shareholder. Also, seven days before Crown Agents was privatized, #ibm-lotus-merged" target="_blank">on Jul. 12, 1995, IBM purchased Lotus Corporation whose collaboration software, Lotus Notes, was planned by the illegal “public-private” #highland-forum" target="_blank">Highlands Forum. and the DoD Director of Net Assessment—an SES member since 1978 Andrew W. Marshall—to be the platform to be used by the Deep State shadow government to control and spy on Internet communications.

At this same time, Leader Technologies’ subsequent founder, Michael McKibben, was being told by AT&T Bell Labs engineers with whom he was working to create AT&T AccessPlus 3.0 for Windows 95 that Lotus Notes probably could not be made to scale in larger Internet transaction volumes.

The collusion among SES, OPIC and the Crown Agents is evident.

Crown Agents Serve the Crown

Fig. 11Crown Agents Act 1995. (Jul. 19, 1995). 1995 c. 24. Legislation.gov.uk. See also http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/24/2009-10-01
.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have tried to introduce the primary caves in this labyrinth of global corruption.

These caves lead us back to the beginning of our investigation–into the people and organizations who stole Leader Technologies’ social networking invention to promote their globalist One World agenda.

The rogue C.I.A. (headquartered in CERN, Switzerland), in collusion with Lockheed Martin, appear to be the intelligence arm of this globalist corporate takeover..

The American Republic can survive this, we believe.

Mr. President: Defund the Criminals and Fund The Miller Act Notice

Mr. President, please pull the plug on these corruptocrats and their illegal funding streams. Since they are all based on fake values, no real services will be affected.

In addition, write the Miller Act Notice check to Leader Technologies for 18 years of unpaid use of their revolutionary social networking invention.  This will generate new cash streams to free up our economy from the globalist stranglehold.  This will empower Leader Technologies and other actually creative people in America to fix our listing ship of state.  See Leader proposes trillion dollar fed revenue while lowering taxes.

One Miller Act Notice check starts the ball rolling, Mr. President.

Keep up the good work. We’re praying for you and your family.

...

Escape from Prison Planet

.

FOOTNOTE:

THE MAGIC OF LEADER’S INVENTION

Leader’s late 1990’s breakthrough in digital scalability gave these corruptocrats a platform to unify their communications globally—on a large scale not previously possible with IBM and Microsoft platforms. Leader’s founder Michael McKibben knew that because he had previously rebuilt AT&T’s email system AT&T AccessPlus 3.0. He knew exactly what IBM’s and Microsoft’s collaboration shortcomings were because AT&T Bell Labs engineers had told him after they had abandoned their failed alliance with IBM-Lotus called “Network Notes.” He knew they could not scale to the transaction volumes needed for the emerging Internet.  Problem-solver McKibben very intentionally set out to create a whole new paradigm. See The Weaponization of Social Media Should Concern Us All.

Once they had their “ah hah” moment in Dec. 1999, McKibben sought legal advice to protect the invention. He was eventually referred to the federal government’s top intellectual property lawyer, James P. Chandler, III. Little did McKibben know that Chandler was chief among the world’s corruptocrats. Chandler, who was already conspiring with the C.I.A., NSA, IBM, Microsoft, Cisco and Silicon Valley, knew that Leader’s invention would finally enable them to implement their dream to spy on everyone.

As wolves in sheep’s clothing, they offered the “social” services and email free of charge, replete with slippery legalese that gave them rights to all user data forever. This power has utterly corrupted them. Property and privacy were abolished in their pursuit of the seven deadly sins… in the name of “national security,” of course.

What they did not plan on was that Leader’s invention could not be controlled so precisely. Social users figured out ways to beat their censors and spread the truth using the very tools with which they are trying to enslave us.