The American Intelligence Media is more than an alternative news site or a cutting-edge news aggregator. Citizens are rewriting history–real time, based on truth, not on the lies of the main stream media and government controlled propaganda. The mission of AIM4Truth is to archive the progress we are making as we find out who we really are and where we really came from and are headed.
You’re all going down. You know who you are. Mark my word….
The gloves are off.Source
“John Brennan should pop the glass capsule and take the cyanide now,” Stone told host Amanda House, Breitbart News’s deputy political editor. “He’s the perp who started the entire Russian dossier matter. He’s lied about it under oath. He’s going to die in a federal penitentiary.” Source
You got selected by whoever controls the traffic to be ‘suspected/accused/determined to be bad for us’ and claimed to be phishing and for us to be on guard!
Keep it up!
Our reply: Yes, this is true. We SUSPECT them, we ACCUSE them, and we have DETERMINED to tell others how bad they have been. Find truth, or dare.
If the person placed very early into my campaign wasn’t a SPY put there by the previous Administration for political purposes, how come such a seemingly massive amount of money was paid for services rendered – many times higher than normal…
…Follow the money! The spy was there early in the campaign and yet never reported Collusion with Russia, because there was no Collusion. He was only there to spy for political reasons and to help Crooked Hillary win – just like they did to Bernie Sanders, who got duped!
“If the feds wanted to engage in mass surveillance on specific groups or political organizations in Michigan, it will now have to proceed without state or local assistance. This will likely prove problematic.
In the meantime, the people of South Carolina fall back into the globalist narrative of protecting Zionism and the Greater Israel Project as it hides behind the Jewish people and religion. Sorry, we don’t buy that old threat any more.
Looks like we are going to need an awareness month just for Zionism. And while we are at it, let’s throw out the dual citizen Senators and Congressional representatives. They have proven their loyalty to Israel is greater than the protection and well-being of the United States. How does Zionism b.s. shut down discussion and debate in your country?
While politicians have tried to pass the measure as a standalone law for two years, they finally succeeded temporarily by passing it as a “proviso” that was slipped into the 2018-2019 budget.
You two don’t need to be such asses.
Our reply: Oh, yes we do, Blake. You don’t win information wars by being a wimpy warrior. By the way – do you work for Senior Executive Service, Serco, the Greater Israel project, X22 Report, Karen Hudes, Lionel Nation, Solari Report, Your News Wire, ‘Q’, and/or the Crown?
We know this is very old news about Nellie for our long-time readers, but we have to catch up folks who have only recently joined us.
“The following chart, produced by Judicial watch, shows how many more people are registered to vote THAN TOTAL ADULTS IN THE STATE. The chart is actually wrong on the 3.5 million number of fake voters, the actual number is 54.5 million (explained below,) the numbers on this chart by Judicial watch only show there are more people registered than are even alive. There is no conceivable way the election will not be stolen.
IMPORTANT: In reality, 35 percent of all proven living adults in America ARE NOT registered to vote. If that is the case, having the records show more people registered to vote than are even alive positively guarantees an election steal. Even if almost all registered voters voted one way, having more than 35 percent fake votes to add to the Democrat side of the equation will guarantee a win, even if almost all registered voters that are actually alive vote Republican. That’s how bad the system is rigged, WE LOSE. READ IT AND WEEP. Source
Rt. Hon. Sir Geoffrey Pattie, founding director of Strategic Communication Laboratories Limited, later renamed SCL Group Limited, owner of subsidiary Cambridge Analytica
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCL_Group (Note how Wikipedia drops any reference to the Rt. Hon. Sir Pattie! Whoops!)
But here’s the proof from Companies House:
Founding director of SCL (now wiped from Wikipedia)
Geoffrey E. Pattie. (Nov. 10, 2005). Appointment of director, Form 288a, Strategic Communication Laboratories Limited aka SCL Group Limited, Co. No. 5514098, parent of Cambridge Analytica. Companies House.
Marconi is now BAE
BAE Systems is involved in several major defence [sic – the British spelling] projects, including the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
Having waited a few days for the Brits to enjoy the big day, we now feature: Secrets of the Royal Wedding Revealed!
Get the message out the best way you can. Everyone has different talents, skills, resources, and audiences. We aren’t limited to Facebook and Twitter. Go big and think out of the box. If the project is too big for you alone, gather some friends and get ‘er done.
Be on alert for False Flags. We have pointed out that SERCO has the contracts for FEMA in this zone.
The powder keg is full: You have the globalists on the run, the UN needs your guns, and the loonies are running the world. So be on the look-out and PAY ATTENTION.
Jeff Carlson. (May 20, 2018). Sir Richard Dearlove & UK Intelligence Ties. The Market Works.
October 4, 2007
“A couple of days ago, the Post broke the news that Roger Stone — a former state GOP functionary who resigned after allegedly threatening Eliot Spitzer’s family — was procuring money for Joe Bruno and pals from his other employer, a cultlike organization called NXIVM. Needless to say, we’ve been obsessed with the Albany-based NXIVM (pronounced, believe it or not, like “Nexium”) ever since. It’s basically like Scientology masquerading as a self-help seminar, run by a guy named Keith Raniere.”
AIM4Truth Joe nailed this image for Serco Awareness Month! This is exactly who is behind the human spraying project – SERCO – which we track back to the Queen’s Golden Share!
…and now we have the paper trail that takes us to the ultimate owner and controller of the global control matrix.
In our continuing efforts to shed more light upon the connections between America and Britain, we would like to show that the U. S. legal system is not only built upon the British Bar, but is, in fact, still subject to it. This idea that the British monarchy “controls everything” in the world is usually considered a conspiracy. But once you have read excerpts from The Crown Temple by Rule of the Mystery Babylon below, you may find yourself re-examining true history of U. S. law.
History is often more shocking than fiction, and in this case it is extremely so.
The American Intelligence Media recently posted an article showing that the British system of secret committees and privileges for the elite are still operative today, as they have been for centuries. No one may formally ask about the British Crown’s “business”; therefore, few Americans or Brits know much at all about the economic insider trading and manipulations in which the Queen of England is embroiled.
In this presentation we point out that every law, attorney, and judicial system of America has arisen from a most dubious and un-democratic system that favors the rich and keeps the commoners in the dark. We hope to shed light on this ancient system that actually arose from Vatican Canon Law and has now reached into every country in the Western world. Our Western system of law tends towards lawlessness and its origins go back to the middle ages where the rule of the monarchy was a divine right of kings and commoners had few, if any, rights.
Let’s get started by establishing the historical parameters of U. S. law that common history would recognize as free from conspiracy theories, but presents facts that are little known by Americans, even American lawyers. We can take our start from Wikipedia:
The Honorable Society of the Inner Temple, commonly known as the Inner Temple, is one of the four Inns of Court (professional associations for barristers and judges) in London. To be called to the Bar and practice as a barrister in England and Wales, an individual must belong to one of these Inns. It is located in the wider Temple area of the capital, near the Royal Courts of Justice, and within the City of London.
The Inn is a professional body that provides legal training, selection, and regulation for members. It is ruled by a governing council called “Parliament”, made up of the Masters of the Bench (or “Benchers”), and led by the Treasurer. The Temple takes its name from the Knights Templar, who originally leased the land to the Temple’s inhabitants (Templars) until their abolition in 1312. The Inner Temple was a distinct society from at least 1388.
The Inner Temple is one of the four Inns of Court, along with Gray’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, and the Middle Temple. The Inns are responsible for training, regulating, and selecting barristers within England and Wales, and are the only bodies allowed to call a barrister to the Bar and allow him or her to practice.
The Temple is an independent, unincorporated organization, and works as a trust. It has approximately 8,000 members and around 450 apply to join per year. Although the Inn was previously a disciplinary and teaching body, these functions are now shared between the four Inns, with the Bar Standards Board (a division of the General Council of the Bar) acting as a disciplinary.
During the 12th and 13th centuries, the law was taught in the City of London, primarily by the clergy. During the 13th century, two events happened that ended this form of legal education; first, a papal bull of 1207 that prohibited the clergy from teaching the common law, rather than canon law, and second, a decree by King Henry III on 2 December 1234 that no institutes of legal education could exist in the City of London. As a result, the Church ceased to have a role in legal education in London.
It may come as a shock that when you ask about U. S. law, you get a description of ancient Roman, Vatican, and British references about which Americans know little. Most people would disagree that U. S. law has anything to do with such archaic forms of secret societies and groups that take vows to the Crown, both the Templar Crown and the British Royal Crown.
One of the best articles we have came across that explains the historical roots of U. S. law is from Michael Edward. We do not recommend the entire article and therefore have chosen selections from the article that illuminate the foundations of British law that effect U. S. law. We hope that you will find the article helpful in our efforts to clearly elucidate the current web of control that the City of London UK still has over U. S. citizens.
The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, are owned by the “Crown,” which is a private foreign power. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the “Crown.” From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous.
The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple “Church” is outside any canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed patent, without induction or institution.
All licensed Bar Attorneys – Attorners – in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not.
This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple. Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.
The Inns of Court to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London – a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800s, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law. They are known collectively as the “Crown.” Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers.
The present Queen of England is not the “Crown,” as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple.
The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.
The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies.
The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery – the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane – a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent “legal” – but totally unlawful – contracts on the American people.
The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim’s judiciary.
The first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts.
By what authority has the “Crown” usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being “constitutional” when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U. S. Government?
The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations.
There are Four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private clubs and secret societies of power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200’s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray’s Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown.
Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated so that you can’t make claims against them. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. They exist as secret societies without a public “front door” unless you’re a private member “called to their Bar.”
While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to fleece Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license to fleece America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honorable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown Temple.
From, The History of the Inn, Later Centuries, written by the Honorable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America:
“Call to the Bar, or keeping terms in one of the four Inns was a pre-requisite to Call at King’s Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands to do so. The Inn’s records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812.”
All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or “called to Bar” at any of the King’s Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.
It’s a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American Declaration of Independence.
This simply means that both parties to the Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. It’s merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same.
By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King’s College in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King’s Inns, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution. In 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had completed a three-year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association was/ is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year’s service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esquire.
In February of 1784, Hamilton wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State’s first bank. He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five-hour speech on June 18th, he stated “an Executive for life will be an elective Monarch.” When all his anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies).
One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown – a Crown Colony. This is an example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple – Middle Templars – have taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements.
Later, as President Washington’s U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain.
Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were, nor are they today. They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.
Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but “legal”, Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our so-called “judiciary” in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.
1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called “States” as direct possessive estates of the Crown.
The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word “State” to signify a “legal estate of possession.” Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word “states.”
By the use of “State,” the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.
All “Constitutional Rights” in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States Government. When a “State Citizen” attempts to invoke his “constitutional”, natural, or common law “rights” in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don’t apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown “law.” Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God’s Law.
The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognized only within natural and common law as is already established by God’s Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn’t legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction).
Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no “law” within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of God, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal “Person” of fictional “status” (another legal term) in order for their legal – but completely unlawful – State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of “justice” are decided by 3 “judges.” This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts.
The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent and Charters for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governors such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted “independence.” Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution.
To have this “Declaration” recognized by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, “between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States.” The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate “United States”, the new Crown Temple States (Colonies).
Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation “Esqr.” following their names as this legally signifies “Officers of the King’s Courts”, which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton.
The Crown was represented in signature by “David Hartley, Esqr.”, a Middle Templar of the King’s Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was “John Adams, Esqr”, “Benjamin Franklin, Esqr.” and “John Jay, Esqr.” The signatories for the “United States” were also Middle Templars of the King’s Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement.
It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part, “to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects.”
The Crown Colonies were granted to “persons” and corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown.
Now, here’s a real catch-all in Article 4:
“It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.”
Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the legal Crown States. So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883? In the Contract between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,
“It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit…”
That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton’s U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.
An additional $6 million dollars was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans.
Since its beginnings, the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It’s very important to know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman Church.
This all becomes very clear through the Concession of England to the Pope on May 15, 1213, a charter that swore fealty by England’s King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same, “I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars.”
Most who have commented on this charter often emphasize the payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British Empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope.
In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys but most held no title of nobility or honor. There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen counsel of choice was not restricted to a lawyer; there were no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London, and closely associated with international banking systems.
Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank of Esquire – a title of nobility – Esquire was the principle title of nobility which the 13th Amendment sought to prohibit from the United States. The loyalty of Esquire lawyers was suspect. Bankers and lawyers with an Esquire behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members of an organization whose principle purposes were political, not economic.
Article 1, Sect. 9 of the Constitution sought to prohibit the International Bar Association (or any other agency that granted titles of nobility) from operating in America. But the Constitution neglected to specify a penalty, so the prohibition was ignored, and agents of the crown continued to infiltrate and influence the government.
Therefore, a title of nobility amendment that specified a penalty (loss of citizenship) was proposed in 1789, and again in 1810. The meaning of the amendment is seen in its intent to prohibit persons having titles of nobility and loyal-ties to foreign governments and bankers from voting, holding public office, or using their skills to subvert the government.
In 1789, the House of Representatives compiled a list of possible Constitutional Amendments, some of which would ultimately become our Bill of Rights. The House proposed seventeen; the Senate reduced the list to twelve. During this process Senator Tristrain Dalton (Mass.) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for any American accepting a title of Nobility. Although it wasn’t passed, this was the first time a title of nobility amendment was proposed.
Twenty years later, in January, 1810, Senator Reed proposed another Title of Nobility Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification:
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
The Constitution requires three-quarters of the states to ratify a proposed amendment before it may be added to the Constitution. When Congress proposed the Title of Nobility Amendment in 1810, there were seventeen states, thirteen of which would have to ratify for the Amendment to be adopted. According to the National Archives, the following is a list of the twelve states that ratified, and their dates of ratification:
Maryland, Dec. 25, 1810
Kentucky, Jan. 31, 1811
Ohio, Jan. 31, 1811
Delaware, Feb. 2, 1811
Pennsylvania, Feb. 6, 1811
New Jersey, Feb. 13, 1811
Vermont, Oct. 24, 1811
Tennessee, Nov. 21, 1811
Georgia, Dec. 13, 1811
North Carolina, Dec. 23, 1811
Massachusetts, Feb. 27, 1812
New Hampshire, Dec. 10, 1812
Before a thirteenth state could ratify, the War of 1812 broke out with England. By the time the war ended in 1814, the British had burned the Capitol, the Library of Congress, and most of the records of the first 38 years of government. Whether there was a connection between the proposed title of nobility amendment and the War of 1812 is not known. However, the momentum to ratify the proposed Amendment was lost in the tumult of war.
Then, four years later, on December 31, 1817, the House of Representatives resolved that President Monroe inquire into the status of this Amendment. In a letter dated February 6, 1818, President Monroe reported to the House that the Secretary of State Adams had written to the governors of Virginia, South Carolina and Connecticut to tell them that the proposed Amendment had been ratified by twelve States and rejected by two (New York and Rhode Island), and asked the governors to notify him of their legislature’s position. [House Document No. 76].
This, and other letters written by the President and the Secretary of State during the month of February, 1818, note only that the proposed Amendment had not yet been ratified. However, these letters would later become crucial because, in the absence of additional information, they would be interpreted to mean the amendment was never ratified.
On February 28, 1818, Secretary of State Adams reported the rejection of the Amendment by South Carolina. [House Doc. No. 129]. There are no further entries regarding the ratification of the 13th Amendment in the Journals of Congress; whether Virginia ratified is neither confirmed nor denied. Likewise, a search through the executive papers of Governor Preston of Virginia does not reveal any correspondence from Secretary of State Adams.
To create the present oligarchy (rule by lawyers) which the U.S. now endures, the lawyers first had to remove the 13th Titles of Nobility Amendment that might otherwise have kept them in check. In fact, it was not until after the Civil War and after the disappearance of this 13th Amendment, that American bar associations began to appear and exercise political power.
Since the unlawful deletion of the 13th Amendment, the newly developing bar associations began working diligently to create a system wherein lawyers took on a title of privilege and nobility as ‘Esquires’ and received the honor of offices and positions (like district attorney or judge) that only they could hold.
By virtue of these titles, honors, and special privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority of U.S. citizens.
Through these privileges, they have nearly established a two-tiered citizenship in this nation where a majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run the system.
This two-tiered citizenship is clearly contrary to American’s political interests, the nation’s economic welfare, and the Constitution’s egalitarian spirit. The significance of this missing 13th Amendment and its deletion from the Constitution is this: Since the amendment was never lawfully nullified, it is still in full force and effect and is the Law of the land.
If public support could be awakened, this missing Amendment might provide a legal basis to challenge many existing laws and court decisions previously made by lawyers who were unconstitutionally elected or appointed to their positions of power; it might even mean the removal of lawyers from the current U. S. government system.
At the very least, this missing 13th Amendment demonstrates that two centuries ago, lawyers were recognized as enemies of the people and nation.
In his farewell address, George Washington warned of “…change by usurpation; for through this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”
In 1788, Thomas Jefferson proposed that we have a Declaration of Rights similar to Virginia’s. Three of his suggestions were “freedom of commerce against monopolies, trial by jury in all cases, and no suspensions of the habeas corpus.”
No doubt Washington’s warning and Jefferson’s ideas were dismissed as redundant by those who knew the law. Who would have dreamed the U.S. legal system would become a monopoly against freedom when that was one of the primary causes for the rebellion against King George III?
Yet, the denial of trial by jury is now commonplace in the U.S. courts, and habeas corpus, for crimes against the state, is suspended. By crimes against the state, I refer to political crimes where there is no injured party and the corpus delicti [evidence] is equally imaginary.
The authority to create monopolies was judge-made law by Supreme Court Justice John Marshall, et al during the early 1800’s. Judges (and lawyers) granted to themselves the power to declare the acts of the People un-Constitutional, waited until their decision was grandfathered, and then granted themselves a monopoly by creating the bar associations. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution mandates that “executive orders and treaties are binding upon the states… and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
However, the Supreme Court has held that the Bill of Rights is not binding upon the states, and thereby resurrected many of the complaints enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, exactly as Thomas Jefferson foresaw in Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 17, p.161, 1784:
“Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless…the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is [now] while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, by in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion.”
After hearing these words, two key questions remain:
The following court rulings clearly demonstrate that U. S. district and appeal courts are not Districts Courts of the United States and therefore are unlawfully operating under a false pretense. It is due to these examples of case law that we have the precedent to shut down all falsely established U. S. District and Appeal Courts that are not within the boundary of Washington D. C., which is the only place they may legally operate.
“The term “District Courts of the United States”, as used in the rules, without an addition expressing a wider connotation, has its historic significance but is misinterpreted in its application. It describes the constitutional courts created under Article III of the Constitution. Courts of the Territories are legislative courts, properly speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States. We have often held that vesting a territorial court with jurisdiction similar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a “District Court of the United States.”
“By section 1910 of the Revised Statutes, the district courts of the Territory have the same jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the circuit and district courts of the United States; but this does not make them circuit and district courts of the United States.”
“Courts of the kind, whether created by an act of Congress or a territorial statute, are not, in strictness, courts of the United States; or, in other words, the jurisdiction with which they are invested is not a part of the judicial power defined by the third article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of the general power which the legislative department possesses to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the public territory and other public property.”
“District and Circuit Courts … do not apply to the court established in the Indian Territory …although the latter is a court of the United States, it is not a District or Circuit Court of the United States.”
“It must be admitted that the words ‘United States District Court’ were not accurately used, …was not a District or Circuit Court of the United States, In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 268, and no such court had, at the date of the act, jurisdiction therein.”
“…designation of a tribunal as a court of the United States, does not constitute it a district court.”
“By section 1910 of the Revised Statutes the District Courts of the Territory have the same jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the Circuit and District Courts of the United States; but this does not make them Circuit and District Courts of the United States.”
“It is established that the courts of the Territories may have such jurisdiction of cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States as is vested in the circuit and district courts, but this does not make them circuit and district courts of the United States.”
The people of the United States had ordained with the constitution how the district courts of the United States were to be applied in Article III. Congress tricked Americans into believing that the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT is one and the same as the district courts of the United States. The U. S. Congress tried to overrule the U. S. Constitution by creating many extra “federal” courts that claim a higher authority over state courts. This is federalism expanding into the court system, where it should have no authority at all, let alone a “higher” authority.
Not only did the promulgating order use the term District Courts of the United States in its historic and proper sense, but the omission of provision for the application of the rules to the territorial courts and other courts mentioned in the authorizing act clearly shows the limitation that was intended. District Courts of the United States, as used in the rules describes the constitutional courts created under article 3 of the Constitution. Courts of the Territories are legislative courts, properly speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States thereby vesting a territorial court with jurisdiction similar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a ‘District Court of the United States.’
Let’s look at some governmental rules, regulations, and laws that address the issue again and again that US District Courts do not exist in states.
TITLE 18 — APPENDIX FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The phrase “district courts of the United States” was held not to include district courts in the territories and insular possessions, Mookini v. United States, 303 U.S. 201. By subsequent legislation the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were extended to the District Court of the United States for Hawaii and to appeals therefrom (Act of June 19, 1939; 53 Stat. 841; 48 U.S.C. § 646) and to the District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico and to appeals therefrom (Act of February 12, 1940; 54 Stat. 22; 48 U.S.C. § 873a).
NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES — 1948 AMENDMENT
Subdivision (a)(1). – To conform to the nomenclature of revised Title 28 with respect to district courts and courts of appeals (28 U.S.C. § 132(a), 43(a)); to eliminate special reference to the district courts for the District of Columbia, Hawaii and Puerto Rico which are now United States district courts for all purposes (28 U.S.C. § 88, 91, 119, 132, 133, 451), and to eliminate special reference to the court of appeals for the District of Columbia which is now a United States court of appeals for all purposes (28 U.S.C. § 41, 43).
Title 4 §72. CHAPTER 3 – SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT
Sec. 72. Public offices; at seat of Government
“All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law. Courts of the Territories are legislative courts, properly speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States. We have often held that vesting a territorial court with jurisdiction similar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a ‘District Court of the United States.”
(Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 , 154; The City of Panama, 101 U.S. 453 , 460; In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 268 , 10 S.Ct. 762; McAllister v. United States, 141 U.S. 174, 182 , 183 S., 11 S.Ct. 949; Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U.S. 445, 476 , 477 S., 19 S.Ct. 722; Summers v. United States, 231 U.S. 92, 101 , 102 S., 34 S.Ct. 38; United States v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159, 163 , 53 S.Ct. 574.)
The Sixth and Seventh Amendments to the U. S. Constitution provide specific mandates, which,which taken together with the ninth, tenth, first, and other amendments; provide a larger frame-work for the “De-Centralization of Judicial Power.”
The Sixth Amendment specifically references the “Districts”, wherein the obviously necessary “Judicial Power” is to be Invoked, in order to prosecute the cases and execute the Judgements arrived at thereunder.
Those “Districts” are referred to in case law, as representing “Precincts”; and linkages therein to authority to exercise this general jurisdiction. Further references to “Judicial Power” are found in the following web-linked Oregon Statutes:
In the first link above, please note that the word “Precincts” is definitely and clearly used in reference to this “Judicial Power.”
The other links demonstrate the vast power that has been statutorily-recognized as legitimately residing there-in.
Presently there are approximately 180,000 official “Precincts” in American; with about another 120,000 roughly equivalent “Polling Places” also involved which is shown on pages 2 and 11 of the following official document:
This idea for the “De-Centralization of the Judicial Power”, is obviously part of the “Original Intent” of our U. S. Constitution as the supreme governing document.
The vast majority of these courts and offices are presently “vacant”; and that means that they can be claimed and exercised by anyone, at least until “cause shown” is presented as to why those presumptive “Justice-of-the-Peace” precinct-level judicial offices are somehow not being legitimately exercised, or else that, in some way, their verdicts, judgements, and/or orders, are otherwise defective.
The “Montana Freemen” were exercising this “Judicial-Power”, from their common law jurisdiction “Justus Township”; and the commercial instruments they were distributing to taxpayers to send to the IRS, received “Tax Refunds” back from the IRS.
A Federal Judge apparently recognized LeRoy Schweitzer therein as a legitimate “Justice-of-the-Peace” and “Judicial-Officer.”
The following links perhaps presenting the best version thereof:
In terms of federal court corruption: I have never understood the idea that the ‘state’ can be harmed. If the state can be harmed, then it takes precedence over the individual. The ‘state’ is a fiction, but the individual is ‘real.’ The state’s ownership of anything is also a legal fiction, but the individual’s property is ‘real.’ In the current court system, the state has legal precedent over the individual, if not by ‘legal definition’ as set forth under the Constitution, then by ‘case law practice.’
This preference by the court is ‘observable’ as an output phenomenon of the court’s rulings. This is why so many people are being wrongfully prosecuted when the ‘natural law’ against the ‘individual’ or ‘moral’ underpinnings in the case have no bearing. We see this as a result of ‘contrived case law’ interpretations that, if uncontested, are used as foundations for ‘further’ contrivances that finally ‘inch’ society as a whole away from the original foundational laws that supported individuals over the ‘state’, the ‘federal courts’ and ‘corporations.’
When a ‘legal fiction’ has precedence over anything ‘real’, a case can be contrived by evil minds for self-benefit over anything. In short, the court system has been undermined using dialectic arguments to move the American Republic away from the sanctity of the individual to support the totalitarian principles of obedience by an elite. It is very simple to understand and observe.
The only way to reverse this trend, is to ‘hold’ accountable our elected officials to the principles of the U. S. Constitution and not ‘case law’ in capricious courts. All of the fictions can be reversed very quickly by ‘winning’ court cases that ‘challenge’ the fictions. One would have to define the priority list of un-constitutional principles, find existing instances where they are propped up by ‘case law fictions’ without actual jury trials, and then challenge them through individuals representing the U. S. Constitution and the U. S. Bill of Rights.
A tsunami of these would begin to drive public awareness and fear into the current circuit courts and perhaps cause the court of public opinion to motivate Congress to revisit all interpretations of Federal courts and their authority.
The federal government is a subcontractor hired by our states to provide the nineteen enumerated services described in the Constitution. The 1824 Webster’s Dictionary clearly states that the word “federal” is a synonym for “contract.”
The “federal government” is a “contract government.” It is here to provide “essential government services” as stated by Article IV of the U. S. Constitution. The “federal government” is foreign with respect to “we the people” and our states of the Union.
In 1860, the British-backed Territorial Government began an illegal commercial mercenary action against another branch of the federal government – some of the member states of the American states union formed in 1781 under the Articles of Confederation. This is similar to what they have perpetuated innumerable times since in other places around the world, for the purpose of commandeering our National Government and putting their own puppet Territorial Government in charge. They were successful in doing this because they used clever semantic deceits and substitutions to fool the public into believing that nothing had changed.
Specifically, they removed the original State of States operating as “State of Florida”, for example, and substituted their own territorial “State of Florida” organization instead, so that it appeared superficially that no change had occurred.
In fact, they had completely undermined our National Government and trespassed against us to take over international land jurisdiction functions that were never delegated to them.
The original State of Florida was converted to the Florida State, a place-holder land trust, also under the de facto control of the British-backed Territorial Government. And they settled in to meddle with our affairs and feed off of us and rack up phony debts against us and our assets for the next 150 years. They have enslaved their own people since the reign of Queen Victoria via clever corporate enfranchisement schemes using semantic deceit to mischaracterize their own people as “citizens” and chattel properties standing good for the debts of the government.
The same fraud has been perpetuated throughout the former British Empire, and of course, surreptitiously imposed upon Americans. Britain has been operating “America” as a puppet master since 1868. It was and is the greatest threat to our national security and the peace of the world.
The British government and the affiliated British Crown Corporations, the Crown Temple Bar Association, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Scotland, deserve to be excoriated for their roles in causing commercial feudalism through British imperialism and legal control of all American institutions and systems of government.
The British government and its affiliates have merely pretended to be our friends and allies while pillaging and enslaving us to archaic legal and economic systems of control. They owe us an incalculable debt and whether or not they ever pay it, that fact needs to be known, seen, and accepted for what it is.
And even far more than the money, manpower, and natural resources that have been poured down the British drain, another debt needs to be recognized — the debt owed to our loyalty, friendship, and sacrifice in the face of their Breach of Trust.
This post is a response to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s – Report on Russian Active Measures, issued on March 22, 2018 (released to the public on April 27) – the so called Nunes Final Report. The report may be confusing to some, so the Anonymous Patriots decided to elucidate and clarify the findings of the report. It is hard to tell what you are reading without accurate backstory.
First, we salute the congressional aides who worked tirelessly to read through the thousands of pages made available to the House Permanent Selection Committee on Intelligence. They have did a great job writing the Nunes Memo and this new report, Nunes Final Report, which is the completed product of their efforts. Other investigations of the committee continue to develop, but this final report is important to get out to the public before election season gets in to full gear.
Devin Nunes has been under fire from the Democrats and the main stream media over his committee’s investigative activities to follow through on his personal discovery that the Obama White House unmasked people in the Trump campaign during and after the election. This discovery and its release to the press caused the committee to question his ethics and even remove him as the chairman for a while.
Eventually, after significant revelations in the first Nunes Memo, Nunes resumed the leadership of the committee. When the impact of the Nunes Memo had settled on the American people, Adam Schiff attempted, but failed miserably, to write a counter response to the Nunes Memo. It was completely rejected due to having to be completely redacted. The Nunes Final Report is another exoneration of Trump in the “Trump/Russian Collusion” witch hunt.
Often, congressional investigations are election-year virtue-signaling that is staged to discredit the “other” side with some wrongdoings or to simply grandstand for political favor before the press. For example, Goodlatte’s committee called for an investigation of Christopher Steele, the foreign agent who worked with Russians to create the fake Russian Dossier. What was Jeff Session’s response? Crickets.
Or, what about the congressional demand for Department of Justice investigations into “leaks”? There are currently 27 investigations into leaks that have been handed over to Inspector General Michael Horowitz and only Andrew McCabe has been recommend for possible indictment. What was Jeff Session’s response? Crickets.
Or, what about the unmasking that Susan Rice was caught doing in the White House SCIF? What about the huge number of unmaskings that Samantha Power did when she worked at the United Nations under Obama? What was Jeff Session’s response? Crickets.
Congress demands the 55,000 Peter Strzok/Lisa Page text messages. First, they all “come up missing” and then they are found again but only 232 of them are released, and then only after they are scrubbed of all “personal references, SES members, attachments, and any texts that may not address governmental business.” What was Jeff Sessions response? Appoint more people to help release documents for congressional oversight. Essentially: Crickets
Good ole “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” Mr. Magoo (Sessions) truly has NO plan, and obviously NO clue – or, he is as corrupt as Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey and the gang.
Devin Nunes’ Final Report exonerates Trump from any Russian collusion. Even Rod Rosenstein recently announced publicly that the Mueller investigation has found NO Trump/Russian collusion. Then why does Mueller continue his investigation seeing that the fake “criminal intent” or “crime” has not been found and no evidence or witness indicates any collusion, conspiracy, or corruption?
This is the same question you will arrive at after reading this Nunes Final Report. Why was there ever an investigation into Trump and Russia? Especially, after a very expensive report was already concluded in January of 2017 that exonerated Trump and his team from any wrong doing concerning Russia, the election, the DNC server, or any of the other “Comey Created Crimes” that were used to attempt to frame Trump with any kind of crime that could be manufactured.
The Intelligence Community Assessment: Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections, January 6, 2017 is the basis for much of the intelligence provided to the House Intelligence Committee and, therefore, had to be part of the final report, even though those highly partisan and political findings were controversial and clearly not substantiated with evidence of any kind. You will find those lies woven throughout this report because the report is quoting the prior “fake” investigation which had no evidence to make incorrect judgments about the “election meddling.”
This is obvious because the evidence that has come out since this report abnegates most of the findings of the January 2017 Intelligence Community’s report. This is very confusing and is one of the reason we would like to go over each of the Nunes Final Report findings to clarify and elucidate what the reality truly is.
Finding #1: The Kremlin exploits free or independent media spaces and open democracies to conduct active measures in Europe.
Reality: The U. S. Department of Defense does the same thing throughout the entire world through the direction of the Board of Broadcasting Governors.
Finding #2: Russia supports fringe political parties and non-governmental organizations in Europe to further the Kremlin’s agenda while also disparaging or discrediting politicians and groups seen as hostile to Moscow.
Reality: The CIA conducted active measures against Putin in the recent presidential elections in Russia as reported by many news agencies and many Russian Orthodox clergy. US sanctions imposed by Obama against Russia were intended to harm Putin during the election.
Finding #3: Russia conducts increasingly aggressive cyber operations against European governments; a tactic that will continue to present a profound threat.
Reality: These were based upon the false reports in France and throughout Europe.
Finding #4: Russia targets disaffected European populations and exploits social, political, and racial divisions in an effort to sow discord, encourage unrest, and incite protests.
Reality: Europe is being invaded by radical Islamic terrorists and Russia has nothing to do with the unrest.
Finding #5: Russia leverages business and economic ties in Europe to achieve the Kremlin’s goals, message displeasure, or inflict punishment.
Reality: These false allegations were used during recent elections in numerous European countries to bolster support for far-left candidates.
Finding #6: European governments and media outlets are conducting a variety of activities to combat Russian influence campaigns.
Reality: Freedom of speech is being killed in Europe even faster than in America.
Finding #7: Russia conducted cyber-attacks on U.S. political institutions in 2015-2016.
Reality: There are constant cyber-attacks from Russia, China, Pakistan, Iran, and many other countries. It is next to impossible to know who the attack was from due to the ability to leave the “footprints” of anyone you want. The Vault 7 Wikileaks demonstrated that fact.
Finding #8: Russian-state actors and third-party intermediaries were responsible for the dissemination of documents and communications stolen from U.S. political organizations.
Reality: This is nonsense, Dmitri Alperovitch left Russian footprints of the DNC server and there was no “hacking” of the DNC by Russia, it was a breach from the inside of the DNC as evidenced by Podesta’s emails stating this fact. Comey tried to blame it on Alexey Gubarev, Guccifer 2.0, Kim.com, and numerous others without any evidence whatsoever.
Finding #9: The Russian government used RT to advance its malign influence campaign during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Reality: The January 2017 U. S. Intelligence Community report harped on old intelligence reports on election influence that was dressed up in new clothes that attributed the news agency Russia Today (RT) with having a great influence on the U. S. presidential election. This is nonsense. Few people watch RT and it had little effect upon the American electorate even though the expensive intelligence report had lots of color charts and diagrams alleging RT got Trump elected and Hillary hated.
Finding #10: Russian intelligence leveraged social media in an attempt to sow social discord and to undermine the U.S. electoral process.
Reality: The pathetic attempt of Mueller to take a New York Times article that was three years old and concoct a story about the Putin sponsored Internet Research Agency that trolled and rigged the U. S. presidential election was completely incorrect. Also, there was no evidence presented in Mueller’s indictment of these 13 Russians who he cannot prosecute. They allegedly spent $100,000 on Facebook ads to win the election for Trump. The allegedly “powerful ads” that spread this discord during the election are laughable and were ran primarily after the election was over and could have had zero effect on the election.
Finding #11: The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s notification to numerous Russian hacking victims was largely inadequate.
Reality: This must be a lie because the extensive prior investigation of January 2017 found no such “hacking victims.” Mueller imaginative Russian trolls supposedly had contact with Americans but no one was informed. That’s because Mueller’s lies don’t hold water.
Finding #12: Communication between the Department of Homeland Security and state election officials was impeded by state officials’ mistrust of federal government overreach coupled with a unprecedented level of Russian cyber intrusions.
Reality: There was little or no Russian cyber intrusion; this has been proven and publicly stated repeatedly by multiple U. S. federal agencies. The lies about Russians hacking voting poles is nonsense according to Homeland Security who was ultimately responsible for the election. Even Obama, Mueller, Comey, Clapper and others all say that Russian’s did not “change a single vote.”
Finding #13: The joint Office of the Director of National Intelligence and Department of Homeland Security public statement attributing election interference to Russia was ineffective.
Reality: That is because there were multiple reports that did not agree with one another.
Finding #14: The Executive Branch’s post-election response was insufficient.
Reality: Obama said the Russian’s meddled, then he said they did not meddle – which story do you want to believe? Obama meddled in the election a great deal through Google, Facebook, and the U. S. Digital Service.
Finding #15: The majority of the Intelligence Community Assessment judgments on Russia’s election activities employed proper analytic tradecraft.
Reality: If you look at the ICA report, the evidence and analysis is weak at best and simply covered up the Hillary/Podesta crimes during the election while pointing at RT – a news agency no one knows exists. The Democratic primary rigging, campaign finance fraud, and paying for the Russian Dossier are all swept under the rug by the corrupt Department of Justice (Magoo-land), FBI, CIA, and the rest of the “17 Intelligence Agencies” that were part of the deceit.
Finding #16: The Intelligence Community Assessment judgments on Putin’s strategic intentions did not employ proper analytic tradecraft.
Reality: The report failed miserably, I we said above.
Finding #17: The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an enterprise counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign after receiving information related to Trump.
Reality: This is when John Brennan lied about the George Papadopoulos counter-intelligence investigation and pushed the “framing” up to the FBI counter-intelligence department under Bill Preistap, Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe and the Comey gang.
Finding #18: As part of the enterprise counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an individual counterintelligence investigation into Carter Page.
Reality: This is the fake FISA 702 (Title 1) warrant gained with the fake Russian Dossier signed off by the following people who lied and committed multiple felonies: Comey, Rosenstein, Boente, McCabe, Yates, and perhaps others.
Finding #19: The dossier compiled by Christopher Steele formed an essential part of an application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain electronic surveillance on Carter Page.
Reality: This Dossier was added to by Russians, Brits, FBI, DNC, CIA, NSA, and was completely fake and was used to frame Trump the candidate and impeach Trump the president. Most of the people named in the Dossier are currently suing Christopher Steele. Using foreign agents to meddle in an election is a felony.
Finding #20: Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted Paul Manafort on several charges, none of which relate to allegations of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
Reality: Manafort was under four investigations by the FBI, CIA, Treasury Department and the ODNI before he ever joined the Trump Team and it was the obligation of those agencies to inform Trump which they did not do for a considerable amount of time. When Trump was informed about Manafort being investigated, he fired him. Same with General Michael Flynn.
Finding #22: General Flynn pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding his December 2016 conversations with Ambassador Kislyak, even though the Federal Bureau of Investigation agents did not detect any deception during Flynn’s interview.
Reality: This is the standard trick of a Grand Jury. Record someone who is not aware of the recording and then use it to trick them into a false statement. Standard operating procedure for criminal lawyers.
Finding #23: Executive Branch officials did not notify the Trump campaign that members of the campaign were assessed to be potential counterintelligence concerns.
Reality: This is true about Carter Page, George P., Michael Cohen, Manafort and others. No agency informed him that he was being illegally surveilled or falsely investigated by the FBI Counterintelligence Department, NSA, CIA, and the other 17 intelligence agencies.
Finding #24: The February 2018 indictment of the Internet Research Agency and Russian nationals exposes Russian actors and their intent to spread distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general.
Reality: Mueller’s indictments were completely fake and shows the desperation of Mueller to find anything Russian – especially since he will never have to convict them.
Finding #25: When asked directly, none of the interviewed witnesses provided evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
Reality: Trump is again exonerated of any Russian collusion. Duh…
Finding #26: The Committee found no evidence that President Trump’s pre-campaign business dealings formed the basis for collusion during the campaign.
Reality: The FBI had already done a thorough background check on any Trump connections to Russian and found none.
Finding #27: The Republican national security establishment’s opposition to candidate Trump created opportunities for two less-experienced individuals with pro-Russia views to serve as campaign advisors: George Papadopoulos and Carter Page.
Reality: George and Carter actually never served the Trump Team at all. Carter Page had a restraining order put on him to keep him away from the Trump Team. George was completely incidental and never spoke with Trump.
Finding #28: The change in the Republican Party platform regarding Ukraine resulted in a stronger position against Russia, not a weaker one, and there is no evidence that Paul Manafort was involved.
Reality: The Paul Manafort accusations concerning Ukraine are all false and have been demonstrated to be opposition propaganda created by Alexandra Chalupa, a member of the Democratic National Committee. Trump has been much harder on Putin than Obama or Hillary ever were.
Finding #29: There is no evidence that Trump associates were involved in the theft or publication of Clinton campaign-related emails, although Trump associates had numerous ill-advised contacts with Wikileaks.
Reality: Trump had nothing to do with the DNC server and the lies created around it that were meant to be the cover story for Hillary’s Uranium One pay-off deals that were found to be her weakest point in the election. Thus, the Trump/Russian story was born in the DNC as a distraction from Hillary’s crimes that might lose her the election. Hillary accused Trump of her crimes.
Finding #30: Carter Page did not travel to Moscow in July 2016 on behalf of the Trump campaign, but the Committee is concerned about his seemingly incomplete accounts of his activity in Moscow.
Reality: Carter Page was a FBI asset of Mueller and Comey (well-known from court proceedings) and was sent to Russia to strengthen Comey’s Russian Dossier story. Page was supposed to be the go-between for billions in Russian funds coming to Trump.
Finding #31: George Papadopoulos’ attempts to leverage his Russian contacts to facilitate meetings between the Trump campaign and Russians was unsuccessful.
Reality: George had no Russian connections, just the lies of Hillary’s good friend Alexander Downer. George’s investigation started in July of 2016, but George was not picked up for questioning until July of 2017. He was surveilled the entire time and so was the Trump Team under false pretenses.
Finding #32: Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort attended a June 9, 2016, meeting at Trump Tower where they expected to receive-but did not ultimately obtain-derogatory information on candidate Clinton from Russian sources.
Reality: This meeting with a known spy was arranged by the State Department that granted a special visa for this Russian agent to enter the country. Manafort was already being surveilled and Felix Sater was the Russian who arranged the entire meeting. Sater is another Comey FBI asset who helped arrange many of Comey’s attempts at framing Trump.
Finding #33: Donald Trump Jr. briefly met with a Russian government official at the 2016 National Rifle Association annual meeting, but the Committee found no evidence that the two discussed the U.S. presidential election.
Reality: Nothing burger. Sad attempts at smearing.
Finding #34: The Committee found no evidence that meetings between Trump associates-including Jeff Sessions-and official representatives of the Russian government including Ambassador Kislyak-reflected collusion, coordination, or conspiracy with the Russian government.
Reality: Session never needed to recuse himself from the Russian nonsense and he knew it. Sessions is “in on” the Uranium One deal though, and this is his “Russian Collusion.”
Finding #35: Possible Russian efforts to set up a back channel with Trump associates after the election suggest the absence of collusion during the campaign, since the communication associated with collusion would have rendered such a “back channel” unnecessary.
Reality: This was one of the saddest attempts at “creating a Trump crime.”
Finding #36: Prior to conducting opposition research targeting candidate Trump’s business dealings, Fusion GPS conducted research benefitting Russian interests.
Reality: When we see Fusion GPS’s records, we will see the list of criminals behind many of the biggest crimes in Washington D. C. and the world. Fusion propagandizes for criminals; that’s their job.
Finding #37; The law firm Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to research candidate Trump’s Russia ties.
Reality: Finally, a Federal Elections Commission investigation into these gross crimes has begun. This is typical for a Clinton – hide behind a lawyer and attorney/client privilege – which doesn’t seem to exist for Trump and Cohen. This is clearly election meddling with a foreign country’s intervention.
Finding #38: Christopher Steele claims to have obtained his dossier information second and third-hand from purported high-placed Russian sources, such as government officials with links to the Kremlin and intelligence services.
Reality: If this is true, Russians, through Christopher Steele and the Democratic National Committee (Hillary and Podesta) interfered in the U. S. presidential election. This is a crime.
Finding #39; Christopher Steele’s information from Russian sources was provided directly to Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie and indirectly to the Clinton campaign.
Reality: The opposition research was also provided to the main stream media and spread throughout the world as if it were truth – instead of politically created lies.
Finding #40: Leaks of classified information regarding Russian intentions to sow discord in the U.S. presidential election began prior to the election day-November 8, 2016.
Reality: Where is Michael Horowitz who is investigating these leaks? Exactly who are these leakers? We know who they are but they haven’t been indicted yet.
Finding #41: Leaks of classified information alleging Russian intentions to help elect candidate Trump increased dramatically after the election day- November 8, 2016.
Reality: The election meddling and attempted framing of Trump with a “November Surprise” (Dossier, Trump Tower server, etc.) by the FBI and DoJ then turned into an attempt to impeach a sitting president.
Finding #42: The leaks prior to the classified Intelligence Community Assessment’s publication, particularly leaks occurring after the U.S. presidential election, correlate to specific language found in the Intelligence Community Assessment.
Reality: Yes, it was intelligence community members who continued to leak after the election in an attempt to discredit and impeach Trump. Clapper the “Lying Machine”, Corrupt Comey and his friend Daniel Richman (NYT institutionalized leaker-Special Government Employee-with a clearance), John Brennan, Sally Yates, Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, etc.
Finding #43: Continued leaks of classified information have damaged national security and potentially endangered lives.
Reality: Has anyone seen Jeff Sessions, Michael Horowitz and his new SES buddy John Huber, or anyone in the DoJ or FBI? Perhaps they are just busy stopping those leakers.
Finding #44: Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN national security analyst, provided inconsistent testimony to the Committee about his contacts with the media, including CNN.
Reality: Clapper is a notorious liar who will go down in the annals of time as the biggest liar in the U. S. Intelligence Community’s history. Every word that Clapper says in public about his interactions with President Trump is a separate crime. Is anyone counting?
We hope that our scathing review and translation of the Nunes Final Report document is helpful in decoding the doublespeak of politicians. In general, the report is great news because it again backs up the fact that the witch hunt was concocted as a continuation of “Comey and the Gang’s” intent on stopping Donald Trump from becoming president, and later attempting to impeach or depose him through a coup d’etat — a good old-fashioned CIA/Soros color revolution that hopes to keep globalists, like Hillary, in key political positions that can continue the overthrow of the U. S. Constitution by transnational corporations who are intent on the complete raping and fleecing the American Republic.
Foreign aid transfers money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries
It goes without saying that most Americans do not trust the phrase “foreign aid” and would rather stop giving money away to “foreign countries” and give that same money to U. S. citizens who are in economic need. In 2016, Obama’s State Department and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) gave away over $50 billion dollars in “alleged” foreign aid. This does not take into account the tens of billions the U. S. federal government gives away yearly to the United Nations and its agencies that are supposed to be doing the same job that USAID claims it is doing.
These United Nations agencies, such as: the World Health Organization, UNESCO, UN Peacekeepers, the UN Refugee Agency, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the many other U. N. agencies seem to be equally incapable of helping people in need as is the USAID. Lots of money gets spent, and the same problems continue unabated. It is disgraceful.
When you look at Hillary Clinton’s State Department “pay-to-play” schemes with foreign governments, you can see an added layer of overt corruption and cronyism between the source of U. S. foreign aid (U. S. State Department) and the recipients of the money.
The American Intelligence Media demonstrates in the evidence presented below, that all U. S. aid is paid to U. S. corporations and individuals who act as a channel for the money to reach the “intended” recipients who are ostensibly in great need.
In fact, $50 billion a year is parceled out to the same old corporate cronies that it is always given to — Wells Fargo, Citibank, hedge funds, off-shore shell companies, etc. Then, other organizations, like the pseudo-government agency called the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), add to the flow of money with huge loans guaranteed by the United States government. Therefore, the U. S. tax payer pays three times for the same alleged assistance going to some foreign country where few Americas ever go or may even have heard of.
Only American corporations, banks, insurance companies, hedge funds, personal individuals and the like may receive U. S. foreign aid – not foreign governments or foreigners.
Therefore, USAID is not foreign aid and it is not aid at all, it is venture capital and investments in U. S. corporations and their agents.
It is also well-known that most of this “international development” money never reaches the intended goal. Often there is little or no compliance follow-through or reporting requirements. OPIC is the worst for this type of mismanagement.
Essentially, any “U. S. sponsor” can file for an OPIC loan and loan guarantee and if the U. S. bureaucracy – Senior Executive Service – says yes, then the applicant can basically count on OPIC funding the project for the entire length of the project, which is often ten years.
This report provides many OPIC funding examples that show the transparent corruption and obvious theft of OPIC funding through corporate cronyism and bureaucratic obfuscation and deceit. The use of off-shore tax havens or Delaware incorporations for many of the recipient U. S. sponsor companies reads like a cheap criminal novel.
In one OPIC contract in 2016, Noble Energy was given a $4.5 billion dollar loan to drill for oil in Israel so that foreign companies could benefit from the proceeds. Power plants in Jordan, Israel, and Ukraine are funded by OPIC so that there will be power supplied for oil companies to exploit and fleece foreign nations, often surrounded by hostilities requiring U. S. military presence to “support” the U. S. corporation.
OPIC also provides a huge amount of loans to banks to make smaller loans to other banks, themselves, or customers. OPIC simply gives money to banks and calls it foreign aid, or international development. These types of corrupt practices are only slightly hidden. The sleight of hand is passed off as a noble and humanitarian deed that should be unquestionable because it is based upon the theoretical premise of “helping” other nations.
It is also helpful to realize that U. S. State Department “aid” is usually in the form of weapon contracts with leading U. S. military contractors, the largest companies in the world, who also make weapons for our enemies.
This is considered U. S. “foreign aid”, even though private multi-national military contractors benefit from the “aid” more than anyone else. In fact, the U. S. money is simply given to the corporation along with the weapons order made by the country being “given” this “aid.”
The big question then arises, “Who gets the $50 billion or so each year? Who determines who gets this money?”
Of course, one might imagine that the U. S. Congress or the White House or the Secretary of State might carefully review the national security and economic considerations of throwing $50 billion around the world in foreign aid. Actually, none of the above make the decisions. Senior Executive Service members in the State Department, U. S. Treasury, FBI, CIA, NSA, and many other federal agencies work together through the Senior Executive Association to set the standards for giving this money to the same channels they have been told to give it to for a long, long time. Bureaucratic status quo tendencies die hard, especially when the usual criminals are expecting their cut of the pie.
Take for example Crown Agents USA Inc. who pose as an humanitarian relief agency which has the capacity to “accomplish anything” that USAID or OPIC need done. They are a trusted British agency that goes back to the year 1711 and have been serving the British Crown ever since. Yes, British “agents” simply stand in line and get their share of the U. S. “foreign aid” pie and then take the money to Africa (in most cases) to help the very Africans who they already manipulate by owning the corporations that control African economics (banks, gas stations, media, etc.). In other words, USAID and OPIC give Crown Agents USA Inc. (actually owned by the British Crown) money and huge loans to enrich their personal “overseas” ventures.
They take money for humanitarian causes as if they were a philanthropic organization and yet are simply well-established criminals stealing from the poor to give to the rich.
This system of lies and deceit go back to the oldest institutions on the globe – the Vatican, the Vatican Bank, the Knights of Malta, the Venetian bankers of the crusades, the German spice-trading banker families, the Dutch and British East India Companies (corporations), and other economic terrorists who “traded with the sword.” The creation of corporations as the nemesis of nations has led us to nation-fleecing as third world countries are targeted for “foreign aid” but, in fact, become subjects of foreign resource manipulation and economic slavery.
Congress created OPIC (Overseas Private Investment Corporation) in 1969 through an amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act during Nixon’s Administration. It began in 1971, with a portfolio of $8.4 billion in political risk insurance and $169 million in loan guaranties.
Organized as a corporation with a corporate structure, OPIC is governed by a Board of Directors, President and CEO, and Executive Vice President, all nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. The majority of the Board of Directors, including its President, are “drawn from private life and have business experience.” OPIC is appropriated administrative funding, and reauthorized on a regular basis, by the U.S. Congress.
OPIC is run by the Senior Executive Service at a cost of $88 million per year with another $20 million a year for other “expenses.” OPIC “claims” to be both private and an agency “paid for” by the U. S. government.
You really can’t have both, but it comes in handy when you want to hide the “private” books of the “corporation” that is paid for by Americans and claims to be “self-funding.”
OPIC is the U. S. government’s development finance institution that claims to advance the foreign policy of the United States and its national security objectives but actually provides monetary support of U. S. corporations. OPIC claims to work with the U.S. private sector tohelp businesses gain footholds in foreign markets. OPIC claims to create revenue, jobs and growth opportunities principally at home and secondarily abroad.
It provides U. S. investors with financing, political risk insurance, and support for private equity investment funds. OPIC costs Americans $108 million to operate per year and expands U. S. business enterprises in more than 160 countries offering political risk insurance to cover civil strife and business interruption.
OPIC maintains a portfolio of more than $20 billion, which has doubled over this past decade. This portfolio spans more than 160 developing countries. Other highlights include:
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is an independent agency of the United States federal government that is primarily responsible for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance. With a budget of over $27 billion, USAID is one of the largest official aid agencies in the world, and accounts for more than half of all U.S. foreign aid and assistance.
Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act on September 4, 1961, which reorganized U.S. foreign assistance programs and mandated the creation of an agency to administer economic aid. USAID was subsequently established by the executive order of President John F. Kennedy, who sought to unite several existing foreign assistance organizations and programs under one agency. USAID became the first U.S. foreign assistance organization whose primary focus was long-term socioeconomic development.
USAID’s programs are authorized by Congress in the Foreign Assistance Act, which Congress supplements through directions in annual funding appropriation acts and other legislation. To support U.S. geopolitical interests, Congress appropriates exceptional financial assistance to allies, largely in the form of “Economic Support Funds” (ESF). USAID is called on to administer the bulk (90%) of ESF.
Also, when U.S. troops are in the field, USAID can supplement the “Civil Affairs” programs that the U. S. military conducts to win the friendship of local populations. In these circumstances, USAID may be directed by specially appointed diplomatic officials of the State Department, as has been done in Afghanistan and Pakistan during operations against al-Qaeda.
OPIC Collaboration with Other Federal Agencies from USAID’s broad spectrum of financial services to the private sector help pave the way for later stage OPIC support. OPIC’s tools build on and amplify USAID investments. OPIC and USAID’s staff meet every quarter to share information about projects and decide how to refer projects to one another, allocate or share investment risks.
Let’s look at the 2016 loans and guarantees given out by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) to examine the patterns of corruption and circular logic that underpins most of these allocations. We see the regular pattern that banks are giving money to other banks or to cover new banking programs within their own banks. Huge amounts of money go for future “small loans” to bank customers or low-income loans. The code words that sound “humanitarian” are used but are simply a ruse, like: financing, leasing, microfinanced loans, and many other types of financial instruments that are internal banking operations that are not subject to detail reporting.
Banco Davivienda S.A. – Loan will be used to lend to low-income home buyers throughout Colombia. $324 million – U.S. Sponsor: Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.
Yes Bank Limited – Will make loans to small and medium enterprises throughout India. $200 million – U.S. Sponsor: Wells Fargo Bank N. A.
Banco BAC San José, S.A. – Will stimulate the local economy of Costa Rica by providing access to finance and leasing for small and medium-sized enterprises. $86 million – U. S. Sponsor: Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.
Andrew and Williamson – Refinancing of Wells Fargo loan involving a farm in Mexico. OPIC Guaranty Amount: $3.4 41,666.80 Total Project Cost: $20 million – Wells Fargo Bank N . A.
Greenland Fedha Limited – Microfinance loans. $12 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank N. A.
Financiera Compartamos (Peru) – Microfinance loans. $15 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank N. A.
LOLC MicroCredit Limited – Microfinance loans in Sri Lanka. $5 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank
MicroCred Senegal – Microfinance loans. $2 million – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank N. A.
Accion Microfinance Bank – Microfinance loans in Nigeria. $1.6 – U.S. Sponsor: Citibank, N. A.
Isik Tarim (Turkey) – Manufacturing, packing and exporting organic dried fruits and nuts. $5 million – U. S. Sponsor: Citibank, N. A.
Unreasonable Capital Fund I, L.P. Sponsor – Loans to Unreasonable Capital Fund I LP to expand their portfolio of investments in small and medium enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America. $15 million
Financiera Fama, S.A. – Expansion of Borrower’s commercial lending business to capitalize on significant unmet demand among micro, small and medium companies in Nicaragua. $7.7 million
M. Suresh Botswana Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $15 million – Botswana Finance LLC
Commercial International Bank (Egypt) – Will guaranty local currency loans by the Lenders to small and medium enterprises, microfinance institutions, non-banking financial institutions and other approved borrowers. $70 million
Sociedad Financiera Equipate, S.A. de C.V. – Expansion of Equipa-T’s microlending business to capitalize on significant unmet demand among low income entrepreneurs in Mexico. $10 million
Capital Bank of Jordan – Guaranty authority to a participating bank in the Jordan Loan Guaranty Facility. $20 million – Global Communities
PJSC Agroprosperis Bank (Ukraine) – Expand working capital financing and other similar lending to farmers in Ukraine. $23.7 million – U.S. Sponsor: NCH Agribusiness Partner II
PJSC Bank Vostok (Ukraine) – Expansion of lending portfolio. $8 million – U.S. Sponsor: Financial Services Volunteer Corps
LEDFC – A non-bank financial institution focused on SME lending in Liberia. $36 million – U.S. Sponsor: Mrs. Yvonne Nduom and Dr. Papa Kwesi Nduom
Schulze Global Mongolia Debt Facility – Providing senior secured loans to small and medium size enterprises in Mongolia. $11 million – U.S. Sponsor: Gabriel Schulze
Acord Capital SAS (Colombia) and Acord Capital SRL (Dominican Republic) – To support the development of its equipment leasing operation in Colombia and the Dominican Republic. $8.5 million – U.S. Sponsor: IDICO
Colombia – Colombian real-estate focused investment fund. $250 million
Golomt Bank LLC – Expansion of the bank’s lending portfolio in Mongolia. $15.4 million
LOLC Micro Credit Limited – Expansion of LOMC’s micro loan and lease portfolio in Sri Lanka. $15.4 million
Ndugutu Power Company Uganda Limited – Will provide a loan to support KMRI LLC, a U.S. small business, to develop, construct and operate a run-of-river hydro power plant in western Uganda. $16.6 million
Trau Bros. (Pty) Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $8 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC
Eurostar Botswana Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $30 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC
KGK Diamonds – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $15 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC
Blue Star Diamonds Ltd. – A revolving working capital loan for the expansion of a Botswana-based diamond cutting and polishing business. $20 million – U.S. Sponsor: Botswana Finance LLC
LOLC Plc. – Will support the expansion of LOLC’s home improvement loan portfolios in Cambodia. $59 million – U.S. Sponsor: DWM Asset Management, LLC.
Federación de Cajas de Crédito y de Bancos de los Trabajadores, S.C. de R.L. de C.V – Loan proceeds and the borrower’s investment will be disbursed to finance Fedecredito’s loans to its member entities in El Salvador. $15.4 million – U.S. Sponsor: Financial Services Volunteer Corps
FATEN (Palestine for Credit and Development) – Loan guaranty support for SMEs operating in the Palestinian territories. $151.2 million – U.S. Sponsor: Middle East Investment Initiative
Early Dawn Microfinance Company Ltd. – Will lend to DAWN, a microfinance institution in Myanmar. $13.5 million – U.S. Sponsor: Accion Gateway Fund, LLC
XacBank LLC Project Description – Will support on-lending to women-owned SMEs in Mongolia. $78.6 million – U.S. Sponsor: Cargill Financial Services Incorporated
MFX Solutions, Inc. – Increase investment guaranty to MFX Solutions, Inc., a U.S.-based organization that offers currency hedging services. $224 million – U.S. Sponsor: MFX Solutions, LLC
Apis Growth Fund II, L.P. – The Fund will invest in a diversified portfolio of growth-stage companies that aim to provide financial services in selected growth markets across Africa and South Asia. $400 million
Helios Credit Partners, L.P. – The Fund will seek to provide senior secured and second-lien loans to companies in Sub-Saharan Africa that require capital for growth, acquisitions or capital expenditures. $300 million – U.S. Sponsor: Helios Investment Partners LLP
Acrecent México, S.A.P.I de C.V. – Will serve as an important lender for a small business in Mexico where similar long-term capital is not readily available. $17 million – U.S. Sponsor: Acrecent Financial Corporation
Siempre Creciendo, S.A. de C.V. – The Project is the expansion of Creciendo’s lending business to capitalize on significant unmet demand among low income entrepreneurs in Mexico. $10.3 million
Financiera Desyfin S.A. – Expansion of Borrower’s loans and leasing activities to Costa Rican SMEs. $10.3 million
The level of corruption found in the oil and gas “investments” of OPIC are blatantly insider deals that enrich foreign government’s nationalized oil industry as well as foreign corporations. What could possibly justify such investments that do not even compile with the overt advancement of U. S. corporations. When it comes to oil and gas, political maneuvering is seen on both sides of the crooked deal.
In the cases listed below, you will see that no U. S. sponsor is even required. The money goes directly to companies that are connected to nationalized industries. One might ask, “Why are U. S. tax dollars going into the pockets of oil barons?”
Noble Energy International Limited – The project is the development of the Israeli offshore Leviathan gas field. $4.5 billion
ERU Corporation Foreign Enterprise – The expansion of a gas trading business by ERU Trading in Ukraine. $70 million
Naftogaz Gas Sale and Repurchase Facility – Will sell gas to a special purpose vehicle during the summer in Ukraine and will use the proceeds of such sale for liquidity. $500 million – U. S. Sponsor: Goldman Sachs International
Amandi Energy Limited – Development, construction, and operation of a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine power plant in Aboadze, Ghana. $542 million – Rand Merchant Bank and Nedbank(Mauritius)
Any time you see the names Mauritius, Panama, Delaware, or the Cayman Islands you are probably dealing with an illegal off-shore account or a spurious tax haven corporation that is less than ethical, if not completely illegal. Setting up shell companies in the Caymans is standard operating procedure for the recipients of OPIC and USAID funding.
From the outset, the dummy U. S. sponsor company that funnels the money into untraceable tax havens is indicating its intent to conduct a shady business deal involving corruption, money-laundering, tax evasion, and general theft as part of the business plan.
Somerset Indus Healthcare Fund II (Mauritius) – Will seek to invest in products and services platforms that provide access to healthcare as well as help to increase access to healthcare outside the major urban population centers in India. $25,000,000
Scotiabank de Costa Rica, S.A. – The proceeds of the loan will be used to expand the Bank’s small and medium-sized enterprises loan portfolio in Costa Rica. $15 million
Banco Delta, S.A. – Expansion of a housing finance program marketed to non-salaried micro-entrepreneurs and small business owners in Panama. $41.5 million
African Local Currency Bond Fund (Mauritius) – Will facilitate local currency bond issuances for institutions. $40 million – U. S. Sponsor: Calvert Social Investment Foundation
WRB Serra Partners Fund I, L.P. (Delaware) – Will provide equity investments to infrastructure assets and related financing and other service companies in renewable energy, electric/water utilities and energy efficiency sectors in the Caribbean, Mexico, South America and Central America. $14 million
WaterCredit Investment Fund 3, LLC (Delaware) – Will aggregate and deploy $50 million in social investment capital to microfinance institutions to scale up their water and sanitation lending portfolios. $20 million
BRAC Africa Microfinance Ltd. (Cayman Islands) – To expand its portfolio of micro-loans serving mainly female clients in urban and rural areas in Myanmar. $6.7 – U.S. Sponsor: BRAC USA
Phatisa Food Fund 2 L.L.C. (Mauritius) – Will make growth equity investments in food and agriculture-related companies in Sub-Saharan Africa. $300 million
Sanergy, Inc. – Expansion of social enterprise in the sanitation sector, including a new animal feed production facility in Kenya. $12.8 – U.S. Sponsor: Sanergy, Inc. (Delaware)
Four Rivers Real Estate, Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) – Initiate the development of its 18-story office building, complete its construction, and to operate it in Myanmar. $41.4 million – U.S. Sponsor: Four Rivers (Cayman Islands)
When OPIC loans money for a power plant, it should add, “a power plant to provide energy for oil and gas drilling operations”. These power plants are certainly not for the common person, they are to advance the exploitation of natural resources and the continued fleecing of those resources for state or personal gain.
The other power plant scam concerns photovoltaic and wind farm power plants that have a U. S. sponsor who is simply the middle man who takes a big profit for arranging a “deal.” Again, the transparency of these criminal enterprises is quite clear. Nowhere is anyone talking about the people they have helped in these foreign countries with this “foreign aid.”
Acajutla Energía Solar 1, Ltda. de C.V. and Sonsonate Solar, S.A. de C.V. – Development, construction, and operation of two solar power photovoltaic plants in Acajutla, El Salvador. $65 million
AM Solar B.V. (Jordan) – Development, construction, and operation of a solar PV power plant located in Al Manakher, Amman, Jordan. $56 million
Central Storage Safety Project Trust (Delaware) – Development and construction of the Central Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility located in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. $410 million. Ukrainian State Enterprise National Nuclear Energy Generating Company
PT Energi Bayu Jeneponto – The development, construction, commissioning and operation of a wind farm in Indonesia. $160 million US Sponsor: Equis Energy
Tè Power Company – Will construct and operate a thermal power plant in Guinea. $110 million – U.S. Sponsor: Endeavor Guinea Power Holdings LLC
Bosforo LTDA de C.V. – Development, construction and operation of ten solar power photovoltaic plants built in El Salvador. $164 million – U.S. Sponsor: AES Corporation (Delaware)
Bangweulu Power Company Limited – Will develop, construct and operate a solar photovoltaic independent power project in Zambia. $60 million – U.S. Sponsor: First Solar, Inc
India Name of Borrower: Orb Energy Private Limited – The origination, financing and installation of solar photovoltaic systems in India by the borrower’s subsidiary, and the refinancing of existing senior debt in India. $15,5 million – U.S. Sponsors: Acumen Fund Meridiam Africa Investments SAS – Will develop, own and operate a photovoltaic solar farm in Senegal. $43 million
ReNew Wind Energy Private Limited – The Project will result in the construction of a solar PV located in a solar park in the state of Karnataka, India. $46.3 million – U.S. Sponsor: ReNew Power Ventures Private Limited
Proyecto La Trinidad, Ltda. de C.V. – Development, construction and operation of solar power photovoltaic plants in El Salvador. $70 million – U.S. Shareholders: Latin Renewable Infrastructure Funds L.P. (Delaware)
Geotérmica Platanares, S.A. de C.V. – Will provide continuous baseload power to the grid in Western Honduras. $180 million – U.S. Sponsor: Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Africa Eye Foundation- Eye hospital in Cameroon focused solely on eye care. Total $10.2 million – U.S. Sponsor: Conrad N. Hilton Foundation
Friends of Cambodian Education Inc. (Texas) – Long-term restructuring of existing construction financing for a new campus in Cambodia. $45.8 million
Mountain Enterprises International, Inc. (Tajikistan) – Processing local agricultural crops to sell snack products. $4.5 million
Tugende Limited Project Description: Tugende provides lease-to-own financing to motorcycle taxi drivers in Uganda. $6.6 – U.S. Sponsors: Michael Wilkerson
SilverStreet Private Equity Strategies – Four farms in the consolidate the four farms into a single commercial entity in Zambia. $28.2 million
Alistair James Company Limited – Expansion of a regional logistics company-based in Tanzania. $44.7 million – U.S. Sponsor: Alistair, Alden, James & Clementine James
International School of Ulaanbaatar – Will support ISU’s campus expansion project, which includes construction of new classrooms, science laboratories, and other campus improvements in Mongolia. $36 million
Obama’s FY 2016 Budget provides $50.3 billion in discretionary funding for the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), including $7.0 billion in Overseas Contingency Operations.
To get a visual impression of the amount of aid sent to foreign countries (through US emissaries), we turn to this very useful chart created by howmuchnet.
How much net compiled data from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for 2016, and keeps track of how much money U.S. taxpayers send overseas. The red countries on the map above is where the U.S. spends billions of dollars each year. Foreign aid also tends to follow U.S. troop deployments. The U.S. spends more than $18.3 billion in conflict reduction in foreign countries.
The total budget for USAID in 2016 is approximately $40 billion. Another $10 billion is spent outside of the control of USAID.
Here are the top ten recipients of USAID funds for 2016:
According to the USAID website, “it is the mission of USAID to help USAID partners to end extreme poverty and promote resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security and prosperity.”
Help End Preventable Child Deaths: $2.8 billion for USAID Global Health Programs, which along with State Department Global Health Programs, contributes to global efforts to support three goals: ending preventable child and maternal deaths, creating an AIDS-free generation, and protecting communities from infectious diseases.
Towards Ending Hunger: $978 million for the Feed the Future initiative in support of food security and agriculture programs to reduce hunger, extreme poverty, and malnutrition. Feed the Future reached nearly seven million smallholder farmers with new technologies.
Promote More Democratic Societies and Institutions: $2.4 billion for democracy, human rights, and governance programs with specific increases in Central America, Asia, and Africa to ensure that our development investments are sustainable and transparent.
Improve Prosperity and Economic Growth in Central America: Nearly $500 million to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to advance economic prosperity through reducing poverty, improving education and workforce development, and strengthening resilience in the region.
Connect and Empower Africa: $300 million to support key commitments and investments in Africa, including Power Africa to increase access to reliable, cleaner power for economic growth.
Enhance Science, Technology, Innovation, Evaluation and Learning, and Partnership: $190.5 million in funding for the Global Development Lab and the Policy, Planning, and Learning (PPL) Bureau.
Rebalance the Asia-Pacific Region: $687.5 million to support the expansion of efforts to strengthen governance and democratic processes, foster engagement with civil society, and promote rule of law and respect of human rights in the Asia-Pacific region.
Most Vulnerable Populations: $3.1 billion in USAID-managed humanitarian assistance is provided principally for emergency food supplies and the underlying causes of food insecurity, assistance to internally displaced persons, and victims of conflict and natural disaster.
Food Aid Reform: Spends $350 million, for cash-based food assistance for emergencies.
Support Agency Operations: $1.4 billion in USAID operating expenses to sustain ongoing operations, make significant improvements in procurement, local capacity building, innovation, and accountability.
Just as President Trump has defunded numerous areas of the United Nations because they simply were not doing their job, so too, he should give consideration to defunding USAID and the OPIC and make sure the fake “humanitarian” aid groups like Crown Agents USA Inc. are never given another penny of relief funds for those in need. Just like the United Nations Refugee program or the World Health Organization, the USAID and the OPIC should be defunded. Then, they should have their assets frozen by the U. S. Treasury while being audited and their assets seized.
The USAID and the OPIC are only considered legal because they have become institutionalized crime and the career bureaucrats in the Senior Executive Service keep the status quo maintained while no questions about these crimes are ever shared with anyone outside of the insider groups. These groups have personally benefited from the standard streams of money that have kept the usual recipients fat and happy.
Perhaps Ivanka Trump will be able to show her dad the corruption once she is on the inside of OPIC:
The time has come to stop paying foreign aid that does not fully reach the people need it. U. S. corporations should not be funded through this type of insider siphoning-off of foreign aid. U. S. corporations should not be supported by the U. S. military in foreign countries, especially if the corporation is there to fleece the third world country of its resources.
The C. I. A. should not be involved in protecting and benefiting U. S. or any corporations. This type of economic world domination by corporations under the guise of helping other nations must end.
Apr. 20, 2018–Americans for Innovation began this investigation in 2012 to try and understand why the U.S. Supreme Court failed to protect Leader Technologies’ revolutionary invention of social networking–even after Leader proved that Facebook infringed their patent on 11 of 11 claims.
What we have discovered is a labyrinth of organized sin and corruption that permeates practically every institution on our planet. Besides watching the Leader v. Facebook court ignore well-settled precedent to protect Facebook, the judges themselves held volumes of Facebook financial interests.
Judges are expressly prohibited by their sworn Code of Conduct from engaging in such immoral and illegal activity. They are prohibited from holding “even one share” by a spouse in a litigant. The games that our judges, politicians and bureaucrats are currently playing by hiding their financial holdings in large corporate litigants behind conspiring mutual funds is just obscene. This corrupt practice began in earnest after a #judicial-conference-mutual-fund-scam" target="_blank">Judicial Conference in March 2001—six months before 9/11 & the theft of Leader’s social networking invention—without public hearing or debate. We call it The Great Mutual Fund Scam.
Here are the corrupt judges and clerk in Leader v. Facebook who each failed to disqualify himself/herself due to his/her substantial holdings in Facebook financial interests. Each person gained great wealth from the Facebook initial public offering in #federal-circuit" target="_blank">2012, this is without even knowing the extent of their offshore accounts. They also failed to disclose their intimate relationships with Facebook’s appeal attorney Thomas G. Hungar, Gibson Dunn LLP:
Our initial scratching at the surface of this injustice to Leader Technologies has now given way to bulldozers and dump trucks. We have teamed up with corruption fighters from around the globe. We have worked to meticulously document these crimes with indictable evidence that some are calling the Crimeline. It was intended as a research tool for lawyers, judges, politicians and the media to help speed up the coming prosecutions.
Honest citizens of the world cannot allow these corruptocrats to succeed. [Note: Over a year ago we sent a copy of this Crimeline to then Senator Jeff Sessions before he became Attorney General.]
Leader Technologies’ shareholders are currently asking President Trump to pay them for the 18-year theft of their social networking invention by the federal government and our rogue Silicon Valley technology community. They have filed “Miller Act Notices” at the White House and have proposed a remarkable Win-Win fix for the horrific problems that this theft has caused. See Leader Technologies files trillion dollar bond lien on the U.S.
What is the connection with Leader Technologies’ social networking invention? These corruptocrats stole it because they knew it would speed up their takeover of the U.S. Republic. They appear to have been right about that. “Social networking” appeared almost overnight like a Phoenix via the #ibm-eclipse-formed" target="_blank">IBM Eclipse Foundation in early 2004 once Leader Technologies had finished debugging their source code. See #ibm-eclipsecon-2004" target="_blank">First annual IBM EclipseCon 2004, Feb. 2-5, 2004 (Facebook started Feb. 4, 2004).
Once we proved the immediate evidence of the Leader v. Facebook corruption, we widened our lens aperture to look at who and what was behind these peoples’ choices to be so corrupt.
In summary, the following organizations came into focus:
We knew a little about Lockheed and USAID, but nothing about SES, OPIC, Serco or the Crown Agents. Considering that these organizations move hundreds of billions of dollars of American tax money around the planet, why are they not in our civic consciousness? The MSM has been silent and has clearly failed to hold them accountable, as is their job. Now we know that this gaggle of criminals are the successors of Nazi Brown Shirts for the Deep State shadow government. They could cease tomorrow and the world would only improve, wars would stop, and a new era of human creativity will be unleashed.
SES & OPIC constitutes an unconstitutional secret government, but it’s worse. Other governments help drive the SES sedition bus.
The Senior Executive Services (SES) includes over 8,000 Obama stay-behind senior federal employees in all agencies of the U.S. government. They openly state that they cannot be fired by the President, which means they are not accountable to our Republic and have a law unto themselves. See our previous post Obama hired them. Trump cannot fire them. So they say. It went viral 30 days ago with an estimated 500,000 views. The story is out.
Former FBI Director James B. Comey’s book title speaks volumes: A Higher Loyalty. Evidently Mr. Comey believes his oath to serve America does not include its leaders if he decides to have a globalist agenda. His associations with Lockheed Martin and London-based HSBC clearly show that he leads this coup against American sovereignty. The arrogance of his current book road show speaks volumes about his moral character.
Connecting the dots, AFI, Leader Technologies, American Intelligence Media (AIM) and other researchers from groups like The Right Media, Anonymous, the real Q and KimDotCom among them have helped uncovered primary institutions through which the SES funds its sedition–totally outside of We The People Congressional oversight.
To see more on Serco and its papertrail back to RCA Photophone see:
The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) was formed on January 19, 1971 in an amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. The Act had previously formed the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) which is closely aligned with OPIC’s seditious activity.
OPIC is actually a corporation whose sole shareholder is the U.S. Secretary of State. The #page=202" target="_blank">SES provides the executive staffing and leadership for OPIC.
Herein is the scandalous scamming of America. Through convoluted legal gobbledygook, OPIC as a company and not a federal agency per se is solely “owned” by the Secretary of State. OPIC is staffed by the SES who state openly that they #page=228" target="_blank">cannot be fired by the President; therefore, by direct inference don’t work for him– even though the President appoints the Secretary of State, their sole shareholder.
As if this couldn’t get more twisted, the Secretary of State is an SES member and technically cannot be fired by the President, who works for We The People. This likely means that We The People have no control over SES or OPIC– even though we fund them both. The lawyers who wrote these laws and regulations (and then protect these entities from FOIA transparency) should be shot for this treasonous word play.
While Rex Tillerson recently left his position as Secretary of State, being SES himself, we doubt he was fired. Just look at how Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions–also SES–is stubbornly hanging on, almost begging the President to challenge his SES employment protections.
OPIC is run by the SES according to the #ses-plum-books-1996-2016" target="_blank">Plum Books from 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012 and 2016. The 2016 Plum Books state clearly on p. 218. Since the documents intentionally fail to define the phrase “independent regulatory commission” it could mean anything if challenged and must be assumed to mean all SES members. Whether narrowly or broadly defined, thousands of federal employees fall into this insulation from Presidential authority:
OPIC’s 2017 Annual Management Report says they have provided $23.2 billlion in benefits—all decisions made by the SES.
Conclusion: SES-OPIC is a rogue outfit ever since the SES was formed in 1978.
The more our investigators dove into the seditious SES-OPIC labyrinth, the deeper it went, and the more convoluted it became.
Serco is led by two British knights who pledge loyalty to the Queen. There are Sir Rupert Soames and Sir Roy Gardener.
“Serco is the biggest company in America that you have never heard of.” Why?
Why is a company that operates the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and over 58 air traffic control system in the U.S. so obscured from the public consciousness?!
Serco Group PLC is a British company with 10,000 employees and annual revenue of $5.9 billion. Serco runs the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office!
Do you mean to tell me that the U.S. Patent Office is not capable of running itself without foreign help?! American inventors take note: You’re screwed.
Next we have Serco Group PLC. Serco is a British company with 10,000 employees. Serco runs the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office! Do you mean to tell me that the US Patent Office is not capable of running itself without foreign help?
We could not believe this either, but here is Serco’s 2015 press release announcing its deal with Obama.. No reasonable person can view this as anything but sedition. This alone should get your blood boiling, but it gets much, much worse.
Serco has 11 contracts with the U.S. Army, Navy, SPAWAR, Intelligence, Air Force, Coast Guard, Marines, US Border Patrol as well as the Transportation and Commerce Departments.
Serco operates 58 U.S. air traffic control towers!
Serco has major contracts with the FCC, FTC, FAA, DOJ, DOS, DHS, ERO, ICE, GSA, prisons, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp and even run U.S. military boot camps.
Serco runs major public works in Chicago, Colorado, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Georgia.
In short, we have ceded great swaths of U.S. infrastructure to this foreign control. Many of the Serco contracts are the most lucrative imaginable. They are “Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity” contracts, meaning they are blank checks for the SES.
What? Are not American companies worthy of such honey pot contracts?
More likely, these contracts reveal that America’s corporate borders were overrun long ago? Ask yourself: Why are we giving our sovereignty to the United Kingdom? That is a longer answer that is superbly answered in the just released AIM article: EXPOSED: ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS AND CORPORATIONS THAT CONTROL THE WORLD.
Serco’s American subsidiary, SI International, was founded and funded on Oct. 14, 1998 by Chicago bankers with Frontenac Company principals formerly with Booz Allen and Bain & Company (Mitt Romney). SI International’s officers included S. Bradford Antle who, according to his Bloomberg biography, was still working for Lockheed Martin where he was leading Lockheed Martin’s Washington Technical Operations with 1,700 employees. Other officers came from the U.S. Intelligence supplier CACI, Inc. and Gen. R. Thomas Marsh came from MITRE Corp who is SES.
On Dec. 28, 2008, Serco Group PLC (UK) bought SI International and renamed it Serco, Inc. aka Serco Services, Inc. and appointed S. Bradford Antle its President.
While Brad Antle was triple-timing employment among SI International, Serco and Lockheed Martin, former FBI Director #comey-bio" target="_blank">James B. Comey was General Counsel at Lockheed Martin (2005-2010).
Now comes the very sad reality that both Antle and Comey sold out America to the British Crown via Lockeheed Martin and Serco.
AFI investigators have discovered hard proof of sedition by Lockheed Martin, Antle and Comey.
On Nov. 10, 1998, AWE Management Limited was incorporated in the United Kingdom by two lawyers who had one share each. This is a standard way lawyers start companies without involving the founders in order to handle the formation paperwork which gets amended later.
On Dec. 13, 1999, Serco Limited facilitated the updating of the stock to the real owners British Nuclear Fuels (50,000 A shares – Golden Shares controlled by the Crown), Lockheed Martin (50,000 B shares) and Serco (49,998 C shares).
Remember, just a year earlier on Oct. 14, 1998 Lockheed’s director S. Bradford Antle has just started Serco’s US predecessor SI International in Chicago.
Serco and Lockheed Martin hold 2/3rd of the shares in #page=2" target="_blank">AWE Management Limited (UK). AWE stands for Atomic Weapons Establishment. AWE runs Britain’s nuclear programs for weapons grade materials. The other 1/3rd of AWE shares are held by British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL). Most importantly, the Queen holds a “Golden Share” in AWE and its uranium mining mega supplier #page=8" target="_blank">Rio Tinto Plc giving her ultimate control. Her Golden Share gives her absolute control.
Here is the Queen’s “Golden Share” in Rio Tinto Plc as inauspiciously recorded by hand at Companies House (London, UK) on #page=8" target="_blank">Dec. 31, 1999, p. 8. Note: When attorneys handwrite disclosures in this day and age, it is generally an intentional act in order to prevent search engines from being able to read the document.
To make this circumstance even more unscrupulously confusing, the AWE Limited (UK) annual report #page=34" target="_blank">on Dec. 31, 2016 actually says in very slimy lawyerly parsing that “The directors consider Lockheed Martin Corporation, a company registered in the USA, as the ultimate parent undertaking and controlling entity.” They did not even mention the Queen’s Golden Share that ultimately controls anything having to do with uranium and atomic weapons production in the UK. The Queen via Rio Tinto actually sells them the uranium ore to produce the nuclear fuel. So, did the AWE directors check with the Queen before making this statement.
If we are to believe the AWE directors, Lockheed Martin controls the British nuclear program.
If we are to believe British Companies House filings, the Queen controls the nuclear program by way of her Golden Shares.
Something is horribly wrong with this picture, especially when one adds the Uranium One, Clinton, Putin, Mueller fiasco into the mix. It appears more and more likely that Putin and the Crown were jockeying over control of global uranium mining rights (Rio Tinto vs. Rosatom). Bill and Hillary Clinton knew this, so they played the American card since the Queen’s ore is enriched in the U.S. in Eunice, New Mexico.
The Queen holds a Golden Share (100% control) of #page=26" target="_blank">Rio Tinto, that operates numerous mines in Canada. In this scenario, the Uranium One deal appears to have been Bill & Hillary and The Clinton Foundation injecting themselves in the middle to get a piece of the financial action. The Kazakhstan “deal” was probably a sham, a cover, just leverage. Mueller was used as a goat to show the quality of the Eunice, NM processing of the Queen’s (READ: Frank Giustra) ore.
If the former is true, then British sovereignty over its national security has been ceded to Lockheed Martin.
If the latter is true, then America’s national security has been traded away by Lockheed Martin who is managing multiple sets of national interests and is, therefore, sometimes acting against the United States in its dealing with the United Kingdom.
Who are the common threads here? Former FBI Director James B. Comey and former Lockheed Martin director of Technical Operations in Washington, D.C. S. Bradford Antle.
It is important here to note a longer Serco thread that reaches back almost a century. Serco was founded in 1929 as RCA Services Limited, a UK division of the Radio Corporation of America (RCA). In 1985, General Electric purchased RCA. Two years later in 1987, the UK managers of RCA bought the RCA UK operations and changed the name to Serco in 1988.
These events within Serco (UK) occurred right when S. Bradford Antle worked for General Electric (and probably facilitated the sale, with the plan to eventually work for Lockheed, former SI International, then have Serco UK buy in to the US classified business via SI International). These sorts of devious convolutions have come to be expected by our researchers.
So more likely, the Queen controls the nuclear activities of both Lockheed Martin and Serco in Britain. This control then walks back to the U.S. via URENCO LIMITED (UK).
URENCO manages the U.S. nuclear enrichment plant in Eunice, NM. Curiously, in their 2018 annual report, URENCO disguises their British 1/3rd ownership by British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) and says instead that “Enrichment Investment Limited” (EIL) is the holder. Further investigation shows that EIL is a mere shell front for British Nuclear Fuels Limited. Why the deception?
Lockheed’s influence over critical national security organizations on both sides of the Atlantic, including AWE, Serco, SES and OPIC is evident. However, these alliances fold back on each other, it appears that Lockheed Martin sold the American Republic down the river a long time ago.
We have two more groups to discuss, then we’ll swing back around to SES and OPIC.
See American Intelligence Media’s new article laying out the history of the Crown Agents.
We won’t repeat this superb research here. EXPOSED: ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS AND CORPORATIONS THAT CONTROL THE WORLD. This article includes links to actual contracts that USAID pays to Crown Agents.
Even our week-long review of government contracts shows that the U.S. government pays billions of dollars a year to Crown Agents USA Washington DC—which is a vassal of the Queen of England. Why do we not hire Americans for this work. This is another example of the corporate borders having been dropped long ago.
Hidden inside OPIC are many dozens of contracts with billions of dollars awarded to Citibank. This tie to Wall Street is evident, especially considering that Citigroup was the first merged bank formed after Bill Clinton and Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (with Facebook’s Sheryl K. Sandberg in tow) abolished Glass-Steagal on #glass-steagall" target="_blank">Nov. 12, 1999.
In addition, OPIC funds hundreds, if not thousands, of USAID projects that involve financing sent through the Crown Agents as the prime contractor or supplier to a prime contractor.
For example, OPIC provided $100 million in funds and an “Impact Award” to Helios Investment Partners LLC—a creation of the Crown Agents Ltd headquartered in London. The Crown Agent’s has only one shareholder – the Crown Agents Foundation.
On Jul. 19, 1995, the Crown Agents were “privatized” meaning they became a stock company with a board of directors. The issuance of stock amounts and rights was in the complete control of the Crown’s Secretary of State, and he or she was bound by The Crown Agents Act of 1995. Here is proof that while privatization may sound like the Queen gave up control, she did not.
The Crown simply channeled its authority through the Crown’s Secretary of State who controlled the Crown Agents “privatized” successor board of directors. Therefore, the Crown has 100% control of its subsidiary in the US named Crown Agents USA Washington DC.
We should note that OPIC is similarly organized as a corporation with the U.S. Secretary of State as its sole shareholder. Also, seven days before Crown Agents was privatized, #ibm-lotus-merged" target="_blank">on Jul. 12, 1995, IBM purchased Lotus Corporation whose collaboration software, Lotus Notes, was planned by the illegal “public-private” #highland-forum" target="_blank">Highlands Forum. and the DoD Director of Net Assessment—an SES member since 1978 Andrew W. Marshall—to be the platform to be used by the Deep State shadow government to control and spy on Internet communications.
At this same time, Leader Technologies’ subsequent founder, Michael McKibben, was being told by AT&T Bell Labs engineers with whom he was working to create AT&T AccessPlus 3.0 for Windows 95 that Lotus Notes probably could not be made to scale in larger Internet transaction volumes.
The collusion among SES, OPIC and the Crown Agents is evident.
In conclusion, we have tried to introduce the primary caves in this labyrinth of global corruption.
These caves lead us back to the beginning of our investigation–into the people and organizations who stole Leader Technologies’ social networking invention to promote their globalist One World agenda.
The rogue C.I.A. (headquartered in CERN, Switzerland), in collusion with Lockheed Martin, appear to be the intelligence arm of this globalist corporate takeover..
The American Republic can survive this, we believe.
Mr. President, please pull the plug on these corruptocrats and their illegal funding streams. Since they are all based on fake values, no real services will be affected.
In addition, write the Miller Act Notice check to Leader Technologies for 18 years of unpaid use of their revolutionary social networking invention. This will generate new cash streams to free up our economy from the globalist stranglehold. This will empower Leader Technologies and other actually creative people in America to fix our listing ship of state. See Leader proposes trillion dollar fed revenue while lowering taxes.
One Miller Act Notice check starts the ball rolling, Mr. President.
Keep up the good work. We’re praying for you and your family.
THE MAGIC OF LEADER’S INVENTION
Leader’s late 1990’s breakthrough in digital scalability gave these corruptocrats a platform to unify their communications globally—on a large scale not previously possible with IBM and Microsoft platforms. Leader’s founder Michael McKibben knew that because he had previously rebuilt AT&T’s email system AT&T AccessPlus 3.0. He knew exactly what IBM’s and Microsoft’s collaboration shortcomings were because AT&T Bell Labs engineers had told him after they had abandoned their failed alliance with IBM-Lotus called “Network Notes.” He knew they could not scale to the transaction volumes needed for the emerging Internet. Problem-solver McKibben very intentionally set out to create a whole new paradigm. See The Weaponization of Social Media Should Concern Us All.
Once they had their “ah hah” moment in Dec. 1999, McKibben sought legal advice to protect the invention. He was eventually referred to the federal government’s top intellectual property lawyer, James P. Chandler, III. Little did McKibben know that Chandler was chief among the world’s corruptocrats. Chandler, who was already conspiring with the C.I.A., NSA, IBM, Microsoft, Cisco and Silicon Valley, knew that Leader’s invention would finally enable them to implement their dream to spy on everyone.
As wolves in sheep’s clothing, they offered the “social” services and email free of charge, replete with slippery legalese that gave them rights to all user data forever. This power has utterly corrupted them. Property and privacy were abolished in their pursuit of the seven deadly sins… in the name of “national security,” of course.
What they did not plan on was that Leader’s invention could not be controlled so precisely. Social users figured out ways to beat their censors and spread the truth using the very tools with which they are trying to enslave us.